Special Issues as Vertical Integration: A Rejoinder to Priem and Mowday

Research output: Journal contributionsScientific review articlesResearch

Standard

Special Issues as Vertical Integration : A Rejoinder to Priem and Mowday. / McKinley, William.

In: Journal of Management Inquiry, Vol. 16, No. 3, 01.09.2007, p. 240-245.

Research output: Journal contributionsScientific review articlesResearch

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{7d9ba7c9192e4439bb6442bac497bfde,
title = "Special Issues as Vertical Integration: A Rejoinder to Priem and Mowday",
abstract = "In this rejoinder to Priem and Mowday, the author amplifies and critiques some of their ideas on the proliferation of special issues in management journals. The author interprets special issues as vertical integration moves by journal editors operating in a context of perceived resource scarcity. He also argues that the proliferation of special issues is contributing to the fragmentation of the organization studies discipline, thus contradicting Priem's notion of a command economy of ideas via special issue and Mowday's sanguine view of special issues. The author offers suggestions for future research on the causes and consequences of the proliferation of special issues in management journals.",
keywords = "Business psychology, Editors' cognitions, Knowledge production, Special issues, Vertical integration",
author = "William McKinley",
year = "2007",
month = sep,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/1056492607302415",
language = "English",
volume = "16",
pages = "240--245",
journal = "Journal of Management Inquiry",
issn = "1056-4926",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "3",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Special Issues as Vertical Integration

T2 - A Rejoinder to Priem and Mowday

AU - McKinley, William

PY - 2007/9/1

Y1 - 2007/9/1

N2 - In this rejoinder to Priem and Mowday, the author amplifies and critiques some of their ideas on the proliferation of special issues in management journals. The author interprets special issues as vertical integration moves by journal editors operating in a context of perceived resource scarcity. He also argues that the proliferation of special issues is contributing to the fragmentation of the organization studies discipline, thus contradicting Priem's notion of a command economy of ideas via special issue and Mowday's sanguine view of special issues. The author offers suggestions for future research on the causes and consequences of the proliferation of special issues in management journals.

AB - In this rejoinder to Priem and Mowday, the author amplifies and critiques some of their ideas on the proliferation of special issues in management journals. The author interprets special issues as vertical integration moves by journal editors operating in a context of perceived resource scarcity. He also argues that the proliferation of special issues is contributing to the fragmentation of the organization studies discipline, thus contradicting Priem's notion of a command economy of ideas via special issue and Mowday's sanguine view of special issues. The author offers suggestions for future research on the causes and consequences of the proliferation of special issues in management journals.

KW - Business psychology

KW - Editors' cognitions

KW - Knowledge production

KW - Special issues

KW - Vertical integration

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=34548742462&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/5f96f9ee-6c60-376f-a471-afade06f12a6/

U2 - 10.1177/1056492607302415

DO - 10.1177/1056492607302415

M3 - Scientific review articles

VL - 16

SP - 240

EP - 245

JO - Journal of Management Inquiry

JF - Journal of Management Inquiry

SN - 1056-4926

IS - 3

ER -

DOI