Social Actor or Technology? Experimental Studies on the Perception of Chatbots Versus Humans and Their Implications for Anthropomorphic Chatbot Design

Research output: Books and anthologiesDissertations

Standard

Social Actor or Technology? Experimental Studies on the Perception of Chatbots Versus Humans and Their Implications for Anthropomorphic Chatbot Design. / Seitz, Lennart.
Lüneburg: Medien- und Informationszentrum, Leuphana Universität Lüneburg, 2024. 275 p.

Research output: Books and anthologiesDissertations

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Seitz L. Social Actor or Technology? Experimental Studies on the Perception of Chatbots Versus Humans and Their Implications for Anthropomorphic Chatbot Design. Lüneburg: Medien- und Informationszentrum, Leuphana Universität Lüneburg, 2024. 275 p. doi: 10.48548/pubdata-985

Bibtex

@book{ddf867dc0c924c97be82c550d09d2fbf,
title = "Social Actor or Technology? Experimental Studies on the Perception of Chatbots Versus Humans and Their Implications for Anthropomorphic Chatbot Design",
abstract = "Advancements in AI and natural language processing have enabled chatbots to engage in highly human-like conversations. Additionally, many chatbots are intentionally equipped with various social cues, such as human avatars, to further enhance their human-like appearance. While most existing research highlights the social and beneficial perception of humanized chatbots, this thesis critically examines potential limitations. Through three empirical papers applying both qualitative and quantitative methods, this thesis demonstrates that users typically enter chatbot interactions with computer-like cognitive schemas, leading to different expectations compared to interactions with humans. For instance, users might expect chatbots to respond quickly, objectively, and without emotion. Social cues that clearly conflict with these expectations (e.g., empathetic expressions or response delays) can have adverse effects on central outcome dimensions like perceived authenticity, perceived usefulness, trust, and usage intentions. However, results provide evidence that these effects are moderated by individual and contextual factors, such as the user's inherent tendency to anthropomorphize chatbots. This thesis thus contributes to the ongoing debate on the (non-)social nature of chatbots by providing numerous theoretical insights and practical implications for anthropomorphic chatbot design. It also outlines future research directions and discusses emerging ethical challenges related to AI and chatbots, considering their societal impact and the potential rapid obsolescence of research findings.",
keywords = "Digital media, Chatbot, Conversational Agent, Chatbot, Conversational Agent, Management studies, Service Provision, Marketing, Marketing, Service Provision, Service robots, Media and communication studies, Social Response Theory, Social Response Theory, Expectancy violations theory, Psychology, Anthropomorphism, Schema theory, Empathy, Social cognition, Anthropomorphism, Schema theory, Empathy, Mind Perception Theory, Business informatics, Technology Acceptance Model, K{\"u}nstliche Intelligenz, Technology Acceptance Model, Information Systems, Business psychology, Health sciences, E-health, Digital health, E-health, Digital health",
author = "Lennart Seitz",
year = "2024",
month = may,
day = "27",
doi = "10.48548/pubdata-985",
language = "English",
publisher = "Medien- und Informationszentrum, Leuphana Universit{\"a}t L{\"u}neburg",
address = "Germany",

}

RIS

TY - BOOK

T1 - Social Actor or Technology? Experimental Studies on the Perception of Chatbots Versus Humans and Their Implications for Anthropomorphic Chatbot Design

AU - Seitz, Lennart

PY - 2024/5/27

Y1 - 2024/5/27

N2 - Advancements in AI and natural language processing have enabled chatbots to engage in highly human-like conversations. Additionally, many chatbots are intentionally equipped with various social cues, such as human avatars, to further enhance their human-like appearance. While most existing research highlights the social and beneficial perception of humanized chatbots, this thesis critically examines potential limitations. Through three empirical papers applying both qualitative and quantitative methods, this thesis demonstrates that users typically enter chatbot interactions with computer-like cognitive schemas, leading to different expectations compared to interactions with humans. For instance, users might expect chatbots to respond quickly, objectively, and without emotion. Social cues that clearly conflict with these expectations (e.g., empathetic expressions or response delays) can have adverse effects on central outcome dimensions like perceived authenticity, perceived usefulness, trust, and usage intentions. However, results provide evidence that these effects are moderated by individual and contextual factors, such as the user's inherent tendency to anthropomorphize chatbots. This thesis thus contributes to the ongoing debate on the (non-)social nature of chatbots by providing numerous theoretical insights and practical implications for anthropomorphic chatbot design. It also outlines future research directions and discusses emerging ethical challenges related to AI and chatbots, considering their societal impact and the potential rapid obsolescence of research findings.

AB - Advancements in AI and natural language processing have enabled chatbots to engage in highly human-like conversations. Additionally, many chatbots are intentionally equipped with various social cues, such as human avatars, to further enhance their human-like appearance. While most existing research highlights the social and beneficial perception of humanized chatbots, this thesis critically examines potential limitations. Through three empirical papers applying both qualitative and quantitative methods, this thesis demonstrates that users typically enter chatbot interactions with computer-like cognitive schemas, leading to different expectations compared to interactions with humans. For instance, users might expect chatbots to respond quickly, objectively, and without emotion. Social cues that clearly conflict with these expectations (e.g., empathetic expressions or response delays) can have adverse effects on central outcome dimensions like perceived authenticity, perceived usefulness, trust, and usage intentions. However, results provide evidence that these effects are moderated by individual and contextual factors, such as the user's inherent tendency to anthropomorphize chatbots. This thesis thus contributes to the ongoing debate on the (non-)social nature of chatbots by providing numerous theoretical insights and practical implications for anthropomorphic chatbot design. It also outlines future research directions and discusses emerging ethical challenges related to AI and chatbots, considering their societal impact and the potential rapid obsolescence of research findings.

KW - Digital media

KW - Chatbot

KW - Conversational Agent

KW - Chatbot

KW - Conversational Agent

KW - Management studies

KW - Service Provision

KW - Marketing

KW - Marketing

KW - Service Provision

KW - Service robots

KW - Media and communication studies

KW - Social Response Theory

KW - Social Response Theory

KW - Expectancy violations theory

KW - Psychology

KW - Anthropomorphism

KW - Schema theory

KW - Empathy

KW - Social cognition

KW - Anthropomorphism

KW - Schema theory

KW - Empathy

KW - Mind Perception Theory

KW - Business informatics

KW - Technology Acceptance Model

KW - Künstliche Intelligenz

KW - Technology Acceptance Model

KW - Information Systems

KW - Business psychology

KW - Health sciences

KW - E-health

KW - Digital health

KW - E-health

KW - Digital health

U2 - 10.48548/pubdata-985

DO - 10.48548/pubdata-985

M3 - Dissertations

BT - Social Actor or Technology? Experimental Studies on the Perception of Chatbots Versus Humans and Their Implications for Anthropomorphic Chatbot Design

PB - Medien- und Informationszentrum, Leuphana Universität Lüneburg

CY - Lüneburg

ER -