Self-selection, socialization, and risk perception: an empirical study

Research output: Working paperWorking papers

Authors

We analyze students' knowledge and risk perception of four technologies. The aim is to find out whether there is a relationship between area of study (self-selection) and progress of study (socialization) on the one hand and risk perception of technologies regarding health, environment and society on the other. The four technology fields under study are renewable energies, genetic engineering, nanotechnology and information and communication technologies (ICT). Key results are: Irrespective of study area, study progress and gender, genetic engineering has the highest perceived risk and renewable energies has the lowest. This holds for all the risks studied (environmental, health, societal risks). For most risk perception variables, advanced students perceive lower risks than beginners, and students in a technical study area perceive lower risks than students in a non-technical area. Factor analyses show that common dimensions of risk are the technological areas and not the type of risk. Regression analyses show that the variables influencing perceived risks vary between the technological fields.
Original languageEnglish
Place of PublicationKiel
PublisherInstitut für Weltwirtschaft Kiel
Number of pages37
Publication statusPublished - 2009

    Research areas

  • Management studies - technologies, risk perception, self-selection, sociolization

Recently viewed

Publications

  1. Determinants and Management of Make-­and-Buy
  2. Guest editorial
  3. Quantum Chemical Calculation and Evaluation of Partition Coefficients for Classical and Emerging Environmentally Relevant Organic Compounds
  4. Mechanical performance optimization of similar thin AA 7075‐T6 sheets produced by refill friction stir spot welding
  5. Effects of pesticides on community structure and ecosystem functions in agricultural streams of three biogeographical regions in Europe
  6. Effekte inter-organisationaler Balanced Scorecards
  7. Comparative effectiveness of three versions of a stepped care model for insomnia differing in the amount of therapist support in internet-delivered treatment
  8. Democratic Horizons
  9. Managing Research Environments
  10. „Ist das dein Handy oder vibrierst du?“
  11. Intra-specific leaf trait responses to species richness at two different local scales
  12. Emotional Human-Machine Interaction: Cues from Facial Expressions
  13. Open Innovation Networks
  14. A Review on Higher Education for Sustainable Development - Looking Back and Moving Forward
  15. Making a difference by marking the difference
  16. Non-native populations of an invasive tree outperform their native conspecifics
  17. Current Trends in Environmental Cost Accounting - and its Interaction with Eco-Efficiency Performance Measurement and Indicators
  18. A Dual Kalman Filter to Identify Parameters of a Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motor
  19. DSM-IV und DSM-5
  20. DBLP-QuAD
  21. Frustrated and helpless - sources and consequences of students’ negative deactivating emotions in university mathematics
  22. Political discourse as mediated and public discourse
  23. Comparison of different FEM code approaches in the simulation of the die deflection during aluminium extrusion
  24. Terminologien/Semantik
  25. Differenz und Alterität im Ritual
  26. A qualitative approach to evidence-based entrepreneurship: Theoretical considerations and an example involving business clusters
  27. Orientierung im Realraum
  28. An Empirical Note on Religiosity and Social Trust using German Survey Data