Self-selection, socialization, and risk perception: an empirical study

Research output: Working paperWorking papers

Standard

Self-selection, socialization, and risk perception: an empirical study. / Weisenfeld, Ursula; Ott, Ingrid.
Kiel: Institut für Weltwirtschaft Kiel, 2009. (Kiel Working Paper; No. 1555).

Research output: Working paperWorking papers

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Weisenfeld U, Ott I. Self-selection, socialization, and risk perception: an empirical study. Kiel: Institut für Weltwirtschaft Kiel. 2009. (Kiel Working Paper; 1555).

Bibtex

@techreport{a3339c43c92e40b5b8b36752d19cd872,
title = "Self-selection, socialization, and risk perception: an empirical study",
abstract = "We analyze students' knowledge and risk perception of four technologies. The aim is to find out whether there is a relationship between area of study (self-selection) and progress of study (socialization) on the one hand and risk perception of technologies regarding health, environment and society on the other. The four technology fields under study are renewable energies, genetic engineering, nanotechnology and information and communication technologies (ICT). Key results are: Irrespective of study area, study progress and gender, genetic engineering has the highest perceived risk and renewable energies has the lowest. This holds for all the risks studied (environmental, health, societal risks). For most risk perception variables, advanced students perceive lower risks than beginners, and students in a technical study area perceive lower risks than students in a non-technical area. Factor analyses show that common dimensions of risk are the technological areas and not the type of risk. Regression analyses show that the variables influencing perceived risks vary between the technological fields.",
keywords = "Management studies, technologies, risk perception, self-selection, sociolization",
author = "Ursula Weisenfeld and Ingrid Ott",
year = "2009",
language = "English",
series = "Kiel Working Paper",
publisher = "Institut f{\"u}r Weltwirtschaft Kiel",
number = "1555",
address = "Germany",
type = "WorkingPaper",
institution = "Institut f{\"u}r Weltwirtschaft Kiel",

}

RIS

TY - UNPB

T1 - Self-selection, socialization, and risk perception

T2 - an empirical study

AU - Weisenfeld, Ursula

AU - Ott, Ingrid

PY - 2009

Y1 - 2009

N2 - We analyze students' knowledge and risk perception of four technologies. The aim is to find out whether there is a relationship between area of study (self-selection) and progress of study (socialization) on the one hand and risk perception of technologies regarding health, environment and society on the other. The four technology fields under study are renewable energies, genetic engineering, nanotechnology and information and communication technologies (ICT). Key results are: Irrespective of study area, study progress and gender, genetic engineering has the highest perceived risk and renewable energies has the lowest. This holds for all the risks studied (environmental, health, societal risks). For most risk perception variables, advanced students perceive lower risks than beginners, and students in a technical study area perceive lower risks than students in a non-technical area. Factor analyses show that common dimensions of risk are the technological areas and not the type of risk. Regression analyses show that the variables influencing perceived risks vary between the technological fields.

AB - We analyze students' knowledge and risk perception of four technologies. The aim is to find out whether there is a relationship between area of study (self-selection) and progress of study (socialization) on the one hand and risk perception of technologies regarding health, environment and society on the other. The four technology fields under study are renewable energies, genetic engineering, nanotechnology and information and communication technologies (ICT). Key results are: Irrespective of study area, study progress and gender, genetic engineering has the highest perceived risk and renewable energies has the lowest. This holds for all the risks studied (environmental, health, societal risks). For most risk perception variables, advanced students perceive lower risks than beginners, and students in a technical study area perceive lower risks than students in a non-technical area. Factor analyses show that common dimensions of risk are the technological areas and not the type of risk. Regression analyses show that the variables influencing perceived risks vary between the technological fields.

KW - Management studies

KW - technologies

KW - risk perception

KW - self-selection

KW - sociolization

M3 - Working papers

T3 - Kiel Working Paper

BT - Self-selection, socialization, and risk perception

PB - Institut für Weltwirtschaft Kiel

CY - Kiel

ER -