Pathways of Conflict: Lessons from the Cultivation of MON810 in Germany in 2005–2008 for Emerging Conflicts over New Breeding Techniques

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Standard

Pathways of Conflict: Lessons from the Cultivation of MON810 in Germany in 2005–2008 for Emerging Conflicts over New Breeding Techniques. / Friedrich, Beate.

In: Sustainability, Vol. 12, No. 1, 144, 01.01.2020.

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{92050835aa4d44fcae9abda324c526b1,
title = "Pathways of Conflict: Lessons from the Cultivation of MON810 in Germany in 2005–2008 for Emerging Conflicts over New Breeding Techniques",
abstract = "The paper uses qualitative interviews and document analysis to examine conflicts over plant and animal breeding techniques from the perspectives of Social and Political Ecology. It asks how past conflicts over genetically modified organisms (GMOs) can inform understandings of possible trajectories of emerging conflicts over new breeding techniques (NBTs) such as CRISPR/Cas genome editing. Case studies of conflicts in three areas where the transgenic maize MON810 was cultivated in Germany from 2005–2008 show that the escalation of conflict coincided with the first tangible presence of these already controversial organisms in the rural landscape. Location-specific interlinkages between discursive and material dimensions gave rise to dierent pathways of conflict in the three areas studied. These empirical results inform the analysis of emerging conflicts over NBTs in Germany and the United Kingdom. The future of NBTs in both countries is still open, and the divergence of regulatory frameworks in Europe could lead to the development of {\textquoteleft}NBT hotspots{\textquoteright} located in particular European countries, provoking an escalation of conflict in areas where commercial application takes place. The paper concludes by examining the potential for a politicization of future conflicts to encompass wider issues related to the transformation of agricultural systems towards sustainability.",
keywords = "Environmental planning, agriculture, conflicts, Genetically Modified Organisms (GMOs), MON810 in Germany, New Breeding Techniques (NBTs) in Germany and the United Kingdom (UK), social ecology, society-nature relations, political ecology, precautionary principle, sustainability transformation, agriculture, Genetically Modified Organisms (GMOs), conflicts, MON810 in Germany, new breeding techniques, Social ecology, society-nature relations, political ecology, precautionary principle, sustainability transformation",
author = "Beate Friedrich",
note = "Funding Information: Funding: This research was funded by Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG), grant number FR 4225/1-1, project number 424882341. The empirical study of conflicts over MON810 in Germany was funded by the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF), grant number PoNa 01UU0903. Funding Information: This work was supported by the Ministry of Education of the Republic of Korea and the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF-2019S1A5A2A03049194). Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2019 by the author.",
year = "2020",
month = jan,
day = "1",
doi = "10.3390/su12010144",
language = "English",
volume = "12",
journal = "Sustainability",
issn = "2071-1050",
publisher = "MDPI AG",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Pathways of Conflict: Lessons from the Cultivation of MON810 in Germany in 2005–2008 for Emerging Conflicts over New Breeding Techniques

AU - Friedrich, Beate

N1 - Funding Information: Funding: This research was funded by Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG), grant number FR 4225/1-1, project number 424882341. The empirical study of conflicts over MON810 in Germany was funded by the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF), grant number PoNa 01UU0903. Funding Information: This work was supported by the Ministry of Education of the Republic of Korea and the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF-2019S1A5A2A03049194). Publisher Copyright: © 2019 by the author.

PY - 2020/1/1

Y1 - 2020/1/1

N2 - The paper uses qualitative interviews and document analysis to examine conflicts over plant and animal breeding techniques from the perspectives of Social and Political Ecology. It asks how past conflicts over genetically modified organisms (GMOs) can inform understandings of possible trajectories of emerging conflicts over new breeding techniques (NBTs) such as CRISPR/Cas genome editing. Case studies of conflicts in three areas where the transgenic maize MON810 was cultivated in Germany from 2005–2008 show that the escalation of conflict coincided with the first tangible presence of these already controversial organisms in the rural landscape. Location-specific interlinkages between discursive and material dimensions gave rise to dierent pathways of conflict in the three areas studied. These empirical results inform the analysis of emerging conflicts over NBTs in Germany and the United Kingdom. The future of NBTs in both countries is still open, and the divergence of regulatory frameworks in Europe could lead to the development of ‘NBT hotspots’ located in particular European countries, provoking an escalation of conflict in areas where commercial application takes place. The paper concludes by examining the potential for a politicization of future conflicts to encompass wider issues related to the transformation of agricultural systems towards sustainability.

AB - The paper uses qualitative interviews and document analysis to examine conflicts over plant and animal breeding techniques from the perspectives of Social and Political Ecology. It asks how past conflicts over genetically modified organisms (GMOs) can inform understandings of possible trajectories of emerging conflicts over new breeding techniques (NBTs) such as CRISPR/Cas genome editing. Case studies of conflicts in three areas where the transgenic maize MON810 was cultivated in Germany from 2005–2008 show that the escalation of conflict coincided with the first tangible presence of these already controversial organisms in the rural landscape. Location-specific interlinkages between discursive and material dimensions gave rise to dierent pathways of conflict in the three areas studied. These empirical results inform the analysis of emerging conflicts over NBTs in Germany and the United Kingdom. The future of NBTs in both countries is still open, and the divergence of regulatory frameworks in Europe could lead to the development of ‘NBT hotspots’ located in particular European countries, provoking an escalation of conflict in areas where commercial application takes place. The paper concludes by examining the potential for a politicization of future conflicts to encompass wider issues related to the transformation of agricultural systems towards sustainability.

KW - Environmental planning

KW - agriculture

KW - conflicts

KW - Genetically Modified Organisms (GMOs)

KW - MON810 in Germany

KW - New Breeding Techniques (NBTs) in Germany and the United Kingdom (UK)

KW - social ecology

KW - society-nature relations

KW - political ecology

KW - precautionary principle

KW - sustainability transformation

KW - agriculture

KW - Genetically Modified Organisms (GMOs)

KW - conflicts

KW - MON810 in Germany

KW - new breeding techniques

KW - Social ecology

KW - society-nature relations

KW - political ecology

KW - precautionary principle

KW - sustainability transformation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85079610154&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/7c8db8de-b091-3cb3-8f87-081d69aebf0f/

U2 - 10.3390/su12010144

DO - 10.3390/su12010144

M3 - Journal articles

VL - 12

JO - Sustainability

JF - Sustainability

SN - 2071-1050

IS - 1

M1 - 144

ER -

Documents

DOI