Normative Balance and Electoral Reform: A Finnish Puzzle and a Comparative Analysis

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Authors

The Finnish electoral system has recently been changed to slightly increase proportionality, but nothing has been done to make cabinet alternatives more ‘identifiable’ before the election. This outcome poses a major puzzle for one important theoretical approach to electoral system change. This approach sees normatively ‘unbalanced’ systems as vulnerable to reform and would have expected a significant increase in the pre-electoral identifiability of competing cabinet options. The article explains the Finnish case by embedding it in a comparative model of normative tradeoffs in democratic design. Based on Finnish case evidence and a statistical analysis of 100 elections in 32 democracies (from 2001 to 2011), the article argues that the type of democracy exemplified by Finland is not normatively unbalanced. In particular, the lack of pre-electoral identifiability is compensated for by an unconstrained multidimensionality of partisan preferences. While it may be true that normatively balanced designs are more stable, there is more than one way to be balanced.
Original languageEnglish
JournalWest European Politics
Volume38
Issue number1
Pages (from-to)53-72
Number of pages20
ISSN0140-2382
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 25.01.2015
Externally publishedYes

Bibliographical note

An earlier version of this paper was presented at the 3rd Annual Conference of the
European Political Science Association Conference in Barcelona in June 2013. We
thank the participants in the panel on Regime Authority, and especially our discussant Adrienne LeBas, for helpful comments. The research for this paper was supported by the German Research Foundation (DFG), grant number GA 1696/2-1.

Recently viewed

Activities

  1. Othering und Performance-Kunst im postkolonialen Kontext
  2. Politische Willensbildung in Ostmitteleuropa: Das Parteiensystem Tschechiens im regionalen Vergleich
  3. 10th International Congress on Mathematical Education - ICME-10 2004
  4. 73. Plus Lucis Fortbildungswoche 2018
  5. Linking modes of governance and social-ecological outcomes in environmental evaluation
  6. Begründung und Anwendung des Vorsorgeprinzips aus zeitökologischer Sicht.
  7. Life Time Achievement Award of the Organizational Behavior Division
  8. 8th LCSR International Workshop 2018
  9. 7th International Environmental Management Leadership Symposium - 2011
  10. Bearbeitung von Problemlöseaufgaben unterstützt durch papier- und videobasierter Lösungsbeispiele
  11. VHB ProDok Seminar "Managing Interorganizational Relations: Process Views"
  12. 14. Internationale Fachtagung der Hochschullernwerkstätten 2021
  13. Präsentation des Zwischenstands zum Projekt "Online Live Sprachkurs":- Statistische Daten- Didaktische Konzepte- Technische Funktionalität der Blended-Learning-Plattform
  14. 7. Bundeskongress Soziale Arbeit 2009
  15. 9th CIS Summer Seminar on Sociological and Political Research 2016
  16. 16th Congress of the International Union for the Study of Social Insects - 2010
  17. Die Zeit des Gespensts
  18. Regulating Platform Capitalism: The Emerging Role of Digital Intermediaries
  19. Kann moderne Umweltforschung zeitlos sein?
  20. Leseprotokoll - und was man sonst noch im Leseunterricht beobachten kann
  21. Methoden-Workshop für das Graduiertenkolleg "Die Produktivität der Kultur" 2012
  22. Nachhaltigen Konsum (er)leben (Workshop zur nachhaltigen Konsumbildung)
  23. Zachor: Erinnere Dich
  24. Gesunder Umgang mit der Zeit: Eine andere Zeitkultur als Perspektive jenseits von bloßem Zeitmanagement.
  25. Digitale Vortragsreihe "Wege zu einer Didaktik der Sozialpädagogik" WiSe 22/23