Do Minority Cabinets Govern More Flexibly and Inclusively? Evidence from Germany

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Authors

  • Steffen Ganghof
  • Sebastian Eppner
  • Christian Stecker
  • Katja Heeß
  • Stefan Schukraft
A widespread view in political science is that minority cabinets govern more flexibly and inclusively, more in line with a median-oriented and 'consensual' vision of democracy. Yet there is only little empirical evidence for it. We study legislative coalition-building in the German state of North-Rhine-Westphalia, which was ruled by a minority government between 2010 and 2012. We compare the inclusiveness of legislative coalitions under minority and majority cabinets, based on 1028 laws passed in the 1985–2017 period, and analyze in detail the flexibility of legislative coalition formation under the minority government. Both quantitative analyses are complemented with brief case studies of specific legislation. We find, first, that the minority cabinet did not rule more inclusively. Second, the minority cabinet’s legislative flexibility was fairly limited; to the extent that it existed, it follows a pattern that cannot be explained on the basis of the standard spatial model with policy-seeking parties.
Original languageEnglish
JournalGerman Politics
Volume28
Issue number4
Pages (from-to)541-561
Number of pages21
ISSN0964-4008
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 02.10.2019

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2019, © 2019 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.

Documents

DOI

Recently viewed

Activities

  1. Female Identities in the Post-Utopian 2017
  2. The survey of surveys: a meta-analysis of arts participation surveys
  3. Deutsche UNESCO-Kommission e. V. (Externe Organisation)
  4. Vom Nutzen enger Kanäle – Diskursverknappung als Methode - 2011
  5. Intensive Quantitative Methods Course for PhD students, University of Edinburgh, United Kingdom
  6. On the Turkish Competition Authority's Lack of Competence in Terms of Submission Cartel (Bid-Rigging)
  7. Small Groups, Big Groups and Social Franchising - A Hayekian Perspective on Scaling Social Entrepreneurship
  8. From Analog to Digital: The Mnemonic Lives of Provenance
  9. Physikalisch-chemische Abwasserreinigung.
  10. THE FUTURE OF ephemera - 2019
  11. Technische Universität Ilmenau (Externe Organisation)
  12. 12th Lüneburg Workshop on Microeconomics - 2020
  13. Seminar - Arts, Crafts, Affects
  14. “Identity Politics” and “Universalism” in Social Movements Today
  15. Journal of Applied Ecology (Zeitschrift)
  16. 6th Intercultural Pragmatics and Communication conference - INPRA 2014
  17. "Warum müssen wir immer ein Protokoll schreiben?"
  18. Leverage points for sustainability transformation in the Water-Energy-Food Nexus – Institutional perspectives
  19. Routledge Taylor & Francis Group (Verlag)
  20. Conference of the Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics - DS11 SIAM 2011
  21. Die Europäisierung des Staatshaftungsrechts
  22. Wissensintegration und Wissenstransfer in der transdisziplinären Nachhaltigkeitsforschung: Das Beispiel Global TraPs
  23. Messung erziehungswissenschaftlicher Kompetenz in der Lehrerausbildung.