Lessons learned for spatial modelling of ecosystem services in support of ecosystem accounting

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Authors

Assessment of ecosystem services through spatial modelling plays a key role in ecosystem accounting. Spatial models for ecosystem services try to capture spatial heterogeneity with high accuracy. This endeavour, however, faces several practical constraints. In this article we analyse the trade-offs between accurately representing spatial heterogeneity of ecosystem services and the practical constraints of modelling ecosystem services. By doing so we aim to explore the boundary conditions for best practice of spatial ecosystem accounting. We distinguished seven types of spatial ES modelling methods, including four types of look-up tables, causal relationships, spatial interpolation, and environmental regression. We classified 29 spatial ES models according to a judgement of accuracy and modelling feasibility. Best practice of spatial ES models varies depending on the reliability requirements of different policy applications and decision contexts. We propose that in best practice for ecosystem accounting an approach should be adopted that provides sufficient accuracy at acceptable costs given heterogeneity of the respective service. Furthermore, we suggest that different policy applications require different accuracy and different spatial modelling approaches. Societal investment in higher data availability of ecosystem services make models of a specific accuracy more feasible or would enable achievement of higher accuracy with comparable feasibility.

Original languageEnglish
JournalEcosystem Services
Volume13
Pages (from-to)64-69
Number of pages6
ISSN2212-0416
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 01.06.2015
Externally publishedYes

    Research areas

  • Capacity, Ecosystem services indicator, Ecosystem services mapping, Ecosystem services modelling, Flow, Spatial scales
  • Ecosystems Research

Recently viewed

Publications

  1. Conceptual understanding of complex components and Nyquist-Shannon sampling theorem
  2. Land-use legacy and tree age in continuous woodlands
  3. Take the money and run? Implementation and disclosure of environmentally-oriented crowdfunding projects
  4. Corrigendum to ‘Likelihood‐based cointegration tests in heterogeneous panels’
(Larsson R., J. Lyhagen and M. Löthgren, Econometrics Journal, 4, 2001, 109–142)
  5. Influence of rhizobacterial volatiles on the root system architecture and the production and allocation of biomass in the model grass Brachypodium distachyon (L.) P. Beauv
  6. Impact of an Acceptance Facilitating Intervention on Patients’ Acceptance of Internet-based Pain Interventions
  7. De-Anonymizing Anonymous
  8. Cybernetics
  9. Current and New Research Perspectives on Dynamic Facial Emotion Detection in Emotional Interface
  10. Understanding the diffusion of domestic biogas technologies.
  11. Effect of the mother tree age and acorn weight in the regenerative characteristics of Quercus faginea
  12. Coplanar micro-strips/electrospun sensor system to measure the electronics properties of the polyethylene oxide (PEO) electrospun
  13. Angels of Efficiency
  14. Investigation on Flexible Coils Geometries for Inductive Power Transmission Systems
  15. Postanarchism as a framework for educational authority in higher education
  16. Navigating cognition biases in the search of sustainability
  17. Collaboration or fragmentation?
  18. ONYA - The Wellbeing Game:
  19. Der Himbeerwurm
  20. Online intervention for prevention of major depression
  21. What drives the purchasing of foods with high sugar? Evidence from Turkey
  22. Subjective status and perceived legitimacy across countries
  23. Rethinking Chemistry for a circular economy
  24. Gesichter im Sand
  25. How much sustainability substance is in urban visions?