Preliminary data on help‐seeking intentions and behaviors of individuals completing a widely available online screen for eating disorders in the United States

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Authors

  • Ellen E. Fitzsimmons-Craft
  • Katherine N Balantekin
  • Andrea K. Graham
  • Bianca DePietro
  • Olivia Laing
  • Marie-Laure Firebaugh
  • Lauren Smolar
  • Dan Park
  • Claire Mysko
  • Burkhardt Funk
  • C. Barr Taylor
  • Denise E Wilfley
Objective
Scaling an online screen that provides referrals may be key in closing the treatment gap for eating disorders (EDs), but we need to understand respondents' help‐seeking intentions and behaviors after receiving screen results. This study reported on these constructs among respondents to the National Eating Disorders Association online screen who screened positive or at high risk for an ED.

Method
Respondents completed the screen over 18 months (February 9, 2018–August 28, 2019). Those screening positive or at high risk for an ED (n = 343,072) had the option to provide data on help‐seeking intentions (after screen completion) and behaviors (2‐month follow‐up).

Results
Of eligible respondents, 4.8% (n = 16,396) provided data on help‐seeking intentions, with only 33.7% of those reporting they would seek help. Only 7.6% of eligible respondents opted in to the 2‐month follow‐up, with 10.6% of those completing it (n = 2,765). Overall, 8.9% of respondents to the follow‐up reported being in treatment when they took the screen, 15.5% subsequently initiated treatment, and 75.5% did not initiate/were not already in treatment.

Discussion
Preliminary results suggest that among the small minority who provided data, only one‐third expressed help‐seeking intentions and 16% initiated treatment. Online screening should consider ways to increase respondents' motivation for and follow‐through with care.
Original languageEnglish
JournalThe International journal of eating disorders
Volume53
Issue number9
Pages (from-to)1556-1562
Number of pages7
ISSN0276-3478
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 01.09.2020

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

DOI

Recently viewed

Activities

  1. Simulation statt Lyrik: Computerspiele als Ausdrucksmittel
  2. Pop, post, pseudo? An analysis of pop feminist magazines as arenas of (re-)articulating feminist critique
  3. Internationaler Workshop "Synergie. Konzepte – Techniken – Perspektiven" - 2011
  4. Conspicuous tourism? Tourists' self-presentation through souvenirs
  5. Formatives Assessment im Mathematikunterricht
  6. Négritude: Hausenstein and Senghor
  7. Springer Verlag (Verlag)
  8. Wie kommen wir zu noch saubereren Wasser?
  9. Leuphana auf dem Weg - 2012
  10. What’s next? Kunst nach der Krise (Art after the crisis)
  11. Formative Leistungsbeurteilung. Didaktische Elemente der individuellen Diagnose und lernprozessbegleitenden Förderung
  12. Contrasting pragmatic choices in responding to thanks in Ireland, England and Canada (New Apporaches to Irish English (Corpus) Pragmatics - 2019, Dortmund)
  13. A Model of Mental Accounting in Negotiations.
  14. Electronic International Journal of Time Use Research (Zeitschrift)
  15. Was wir den Toten schulden
  16. Leuphana Universität Lüneburg (Organisation)
  17. Die an die Schüler/-innen gerichtete Sprache. Erste Ergebnisse einer Studie zur Variation der Lehrer/-innensprache von der Grundschule bis zur Oberstufe
  18. 15th International Symposium on Toxicity Assessment - ISTA 2011
  19. 2. Symposium Positive Psychologie - 2011
  20. „Künstliche Intelligenz im Alltag“ – Heute, Morgen und danach? @ Landfrauen Kirchgellersen
  21. Homo oeconomicus and its racialized Other
  22. Workshop/Lehrerfortbildung: Das Praxiserkundungsprojekt (PEP) als Instrument zur Unterrichtsentwicklung: Teil 1 - 2013
  23. Leuphana Universität Lüneburg (Organisation)