Key questions and uncertainties associated with the assessment of the cropland greenhouse gas balance: The carbon balance of European croplands

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Standard

Key questions and uncertainties associated with the assessment of the cropland greenhouse gas balance: The carbon balance of European croplands. / Osborne, Bruce; Saunders, Matthew; Walmsley, David et al.
In: Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, Vol. 139, No. 3, 15.11.2010, p. 293-301.

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{0ea18c46a4444a71b1dc80f9c540a88e,
title = "Key questions and uncertainties associated with the assessment of the cropland greenhouse gas balance: The carbon balance of European croplands",
abstract = "The geographic spread of croplands, together with the diversity of crops and management practices, and the largely seasonally-restricted cycle of crop production, complicates a detailed assessment of the cropland carbon or greenhouse gas balance at the European/continental scale. Whilst the major components that contribute to the carbon budget at the ecosystem scale have been identified, a number of additional factors/parameters remain to be quantified, such as a more detailed assessment of both the direct and indirect impacts of volatile organic carbon production. In addition, there are various ways in which improved estimates of the carbon balance might be achieved, some of which are largely specific to croplands, whilst others are of more general relevance. These include a more detailed examination of dissolved organic as well as inorganic carbon fluxes, more extensive measurements of non-carbon greenhouse gases, such as methane and nitrous oxide, and their fluxes between the atmosphere and the soil, rather than just focussing on losses, and improved measurement protocols, particularly the partitioning of heterotrophic and autotrophic respiration. In addition, there is a need for improved spatial resolution, either through more intensive sampling and/or the employment and development of new technology that can be used for making continuous measurements over larger areas of land. Relatively straightforward assessments of the inputs and losses associated with harvests and the use of organic fertilizers are also required. The quantitative significance of fires is also unclear, with a potential complexity of interactions with soil and atmospheric processes that are not reflected in current assessments. Finally, a more comprehensive coverage of the dominant crops/cropping systems are required before we can say that the budgets are truly reflective of the major European cropland ecosystems.",
keywords = "Ecosystems Research, Carbon/greenhouse gas budgets, Component fluxes, Cropland diversity, Missing values, Uncertainties",
author = "Bruce Osborne and Matthew Saunders and David Walmsley and Michael Jones and Pete Smith",
year = "2010",
month = nov,
day = "15",
doi = "10.1016/j.agee.2010.05.009",
language = "English",
volume = "139",
pages = "293--301",
journal = "Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment",
issn = "0167-8809",
publisher = "Elsevier B.V.",
number = "3",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Key questions and uncertainties associated with the assessment of the cropland greenhouse gas balance

T2 - The carbon balance of European croplands

AU - Osborne, Bruce

AU - Saunders, Matthew

AU - Walmsley, David

AU - Jones, Michael

AU - Smith, Pete

PY - 2010/11/15

Y1 - 2010/11/15

N2 - The geographic spread of croplands, together with the diversity of crops and management practices, and the largely seasonally-restricted cycle of crop production, complicates a detailed assessment of the cropland carbon or greenhouse gas balance at the European/continental scale. Whilst the major components that contribute to the carbon budget at the ecosystem scale have been identified, a number of additional factors/parameters remain to be quantified, such as a more detailed assessment of both the direct and indirect impacts of volatile organic carbon production. In addition, there are various ways in which improved estimates of the carbon balance might be achieved, some of which are largely specific to croplands, whilst others are of more general relevance. These include a more detailed examination of dissolved organic as well as inorganic carbon fluxes, more extensive measurements of non-carbon greenhouse gases, such as methane and nitrous oxide, and their fluxes between the atmosphere and the soil, rather than just focussing on losses, and improved measurement protocols, particularly the partitioning of heterotrophic and autotrophic respiration. In addition, there is a need for improved spatial resolution, either through more intensive sampling and/or the employment and development of new technology that can be used for making continuous measurements over larger areas of land. Relatively straightforward assessments of the inputs and losses associated with harvests and the use of organic fertilizers are also required. The quantitative significance of fires is also unclear, with a potential complexity of interactions with soil and atmospheric processes that are not reflected in current assessments. Finally, a more comprehensive coverage of the dominant crops/cropping systems are required before we can say that the budgets are truly reflective of the major European cropland ecosystems.

AB - The geographic spread of croplands, together with the diversity of crops and management practices, and the largely seasonally-restricted cycle of crop production, complicates a detailed assessment of the cropland carbon or greenhouse gas balance at the European/continental scale. Whilst the major components that contribute to the carbon budget at the ecosystem scale have been identified, a number of additional factors/parameters remain to be quantified, such as a more detailed assessment of both the direct and indirect impacts of volatile organic carbon production. In addition, there are various ways in which improved estimates of the carbon balance might be achieved, some of which are largely specific to croplands, whilst others are of more general relevance. These include a more detailed examination of dissolved organic as well as inorganic carbon fluxes, more extensive measurements of non-carbon greenhouse gases, such as methane and nitrous oxide, and their fluxes between the atmosphere and the soil, rather than just focussing on losses, and improved measurement protocols, particularly the partitioning of heterotrophic and autotrophic respiration. In addition, there is a need for improved spatial resolution, either through more intensive sampling and/or the employment and development of new technology that can be used for making continuous measurements over larger areas of land. Relatively straightforward assessments of the inputs and losses associated with harvests and the use of organic fertilizers are also required. The quantitative significance of fires is also unclear, with a potential complexity of interactions with soil and atmospheric processes that are not reflected in current assessments. Finally, a more comprehensive coverage of the dominant crops/cropping systems are required before we can say that the budgets are truly reflective of the major European cropland ecosystems.

KW - Ecosystems Research

KW - Carbon/greenhouse gas budgets

KW - Component fluxes

KW - Cropland diversity

KW - Missing values

KW - Uncertainties

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=78449255559&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.agee.2010.05.009

DO - 10.1016/j.agee.2010.05.009

M3 - Journal articles

VL - 139

SP - 293

EP - 301

JO - Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment

JF - Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment

SN - 0167-8809

IS - 3

ER -