How to Communicate Science to the Public?

Research output: Journal contributionsScientific review articlesResearch

Standard

How to Communicate Science to the Public? / Konig, Laura M.; Altenmüller, Marlene S.; Fick, Julian et al.
In: Zeitschrift fur Psychologie / Journal of Psychology, 06.09.2024.

Research output: Journal contributionsScientific review articlesResearch

Harvard

APA

Konig, L. M., Altenmüller, M. S., Fick, J., Crusius, J., Genschow, O., & Sauerland, M. (2024). How to Communicate Science to the Public? Zeitschrift fur Psychologie / Journal of Psychology. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000572

Vancouver

Konig LM, Altenmüller MS, Fick J, Crusius J, Genschow O, Sauerland M. How to Communicate Science to the Public? Zeitschrift fur Psychologie / Journal of Psychology. 2024 Sept 6. Epub 2024 Sept 6. doi: 10.1027/2151-2604/a000572

Bibtex

@article{8398cda5f68744cda5caedaed4d4d12c,
title = "How to Communicate Science to the Public?",
abstract = "Abstract: Communicating research findings to the public in a clear but engaging manner is challenging, yet central for maximizing their societal impact. This systematic review aimed to derive evidence-based strategies for science communication from experimental studies. Three databases were searched in December 2022. Experimental studies published in English or German were included if they tested the effect of providing written information about science to adults aged 16+ years by assessing the impact on at least one of four domains of science communication aims (understanding and knowledge, attitudes and trust, intention and behavior, engagement). A total of 171 publications were included. Derived strategies include avoiding jargon, carefully structuring texts, including citations and expert sources, being mindful about how and when to indicate conflict or uncertainty in science, using neutral language, and highlighting Open Science principles and replicability. They can be used to communicate science effectively to lay audiences, benefitting the society.",
keywords = "media psychology, public engagement, science communication, scientific communication, trust in science, Psychology",
author = "Konig, {Laura M.} and Altenm{\"u}ller, {Marlene S.} and Julian Fick and Jan Crusius and Oliver Genschow and Melanie Sauerland",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2024 Hogrefe Publishing.",
year = "2024",
month = sep,
day = "6",
doi = "10.1027/2151-2604/a000572",
language = "English",
journal = "Zeitschrift fur Psychologie / Journal of Psychology",
issn = "2190-8370",
publisher = "Hogrefe Verlag GmbH & Co. KG",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - How to Communicate Science to the Public?

AU - Konig, Laura M.

AU - Altenmüller, Marlene S.

AU - Fick, Julian

AU - Crusius, Jan

AU - Genschow, Oliver

AU - Sauerland, Melanie

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2024 Hogrefe Publishing.

PY - 2024/9/6

Y1 - 2024/9/6

N2 - Abstract: Communicating research findings to the public in a clear but engaging manner is challenging, yet central for maximizing their societal impact. This systematic review aimed to derive evidence-based strategies for science communication from experimental studies. Three databases were searched in December 2022. Experimental studies published in English or German were included if they tested the effect of providing written information about science to adults aged 16+ years by assessing the impact on at least one of four domains of science communication aims (understanding and knowledge, attitudes and trust, intention and behavior, engagement). A total of 171 publications were included. Derived strategies include avoiding jargon, carefully structuring texts, including citations and expert sources, being mindful about how and when to indicate conflict or uncertainty in science, using neutral language, and highlighting Open Science principles and replicability. They can be used to communicate science effectively to lay audiences, benefitting the society.

AB - Abstract: Communicating research findings to the public in a clear but engaging manner is challenging, yet central for maximizing their societal impact. This systematic review aimed to derive evidence-based strategies for science communication from experimental studies. Three databases were searched in December 2022. Experimental studies published in English or German were included if they tested the effect of providing written information about science to adults aged 16+ years by assessing the impact on at least one of four domains of science communication aims (understanding and knowledge, attitudes and trust, intention and behavior, engagement). A total of 171 publications were included. Derived strategies include avoiding jargon, carefully structuring texts, including citations and expert sources, being mindful about how and when to indicate conflict or uncertainty in science, using neutral language, and highlighting Open Science principles and replicability. They can be used to communicate science effectively to lay audiences, benefitting the society.

KW - media psychology

KW - public engagement

KW - science communication

KW - scientific communication

KW - trust in science

KW - Psychology

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85203846160&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1027/2151-2604/a000572

DO - 10.1027/2151-2604/a000572

M3 - Scientific review articles

AN - SCOPUS:85203846160

JO - Zeitschrift fur Psychologie / Journal of Psychology

JF - Zeitschrift fur Psychologie / Journal of Psychology

SN - 2190-8370

ER -