How to Communicate Science to the Public? Recommendations for Effective Written Communication Derived From a Systematic Review

Publikation: Beiträge in ZeitschriftenÜbersichtsarbeitenForschung

Standard

How to Communicate Science to the Public? Recommendations for Effective Written Communication Derived From a Systematic Review. / Konig, Laura M.; Altenmüller, Marlene S.; Fick, Julian et al.
in: Zeitschrift für Psychologie, Jahrgang 233, Nr. 1, 01.01.2025, S. 40-51.

Publikation: Beiträge in ZeitschriftenÜbersichtsarbeitenForschung

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Konig LM, Altenmüller MS, Fick J, Crusius J, Genschow O, Sauerland M. How to Communicate Science to the Public? Recommendations for Effective Written Communication Derived From a Systematic Review. Zeitschrift für Psychologie. 2025 Jan 1;233(1):40-51. Epub 2024 Sep 6. doi: 10.1027/2151-2604/a000572

Bibtex

@article{8398cda5f68744cda5caedaed4d4d12c,
title = "How to Communicate Science to the Public?: Recommendations for Effective Written Communication Derived From a Systematic Review",
abstract = "Abstract: Communicating research findings to the public in a clear but engaging manner is challenging, yet central for maximizing their societal impact. This systematic review aimed to derive evidence-based strategies for science communication from experimental studies. Three databases were searched in December 2022. Experimental studies published in English or German were included if they tested the effect of providing written information about science to adults aged 16+ years by assessing the impact on at least one of four domains of science communication aims (understanding and knowledge, attitudes and trust, intention and behavior, engagement). A total of 171 publications were included. Derived strategies include avoiding jargon, carefully structuring texts, including citations and expert sources, being mindful about how and when to indicate conflict or uncertainty in science, using neutral language, and highlighting Open Science principles and replicability. They can be used to communicate science effectively to lay audiences, benefitting the society.",
keywords = "media psychology, public engagement, science communication, scientific communication, trust in science, Psychology",
author = "Konig, {Laura M.} and Altenm{\"u}ller, {Marlene S.} and Julian Fick and Jan Crusius and Oliver Genschow and Melanie Sauerland",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2024 Hogrefe Publishing.",
year = "2025",
month = jan,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1027/2151-2604/a000572",
language = "English",
volume = "233",
pages = "40--51",
journal = "Zeitschrift f{\"u}r Psychologie",
issn = "2190-8370",
publisher = "Hogrefe Publishing",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - How to Communicate Science to the Public?

T2 - Recommendations for Effective Written Communication Derived From a Systematic Review

AU - Konig, Laura M.

AU - Altenmüller, Marlene S.

AU - Fick, Julian

AU - Crusius, Jan

AU - Genschow, Oliver

AU - Sauerland, Melanie

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2024 Hogrefe Publishing.

PY - 2025/1/1

Y1 - 2025/1/1

N2 - Abstract: Communicating research findings to the public in a clear but engaging manner is challenging, yet central for maximizing their societal impact. This systematic review aimed to derive evidence-based strategies for science communication from experimental studies. Three databases were searched in December 2022. Experimental studies published in English or German were included if they tested the effect of providing written information about science to adults aged 16+ years by assessing the impact on at least one of four domains of science communication aims (understanding and knowledge, attitudes and trust, intention and behavior, engagement). A total of 171 publications were included. Derived strategies include avoiding jargon, carefully structuring texts, including citations and expert sources, being mindful about how and when to indicate conflict or uncertainty in science, using neutral language, and highlighting Open Science principles and replicability. They can be used to communicate science effectively to lay audiences, benefitting the society.

AB - Abstract: Communicating research findings to the public in a clear but engaging manner is challenging, yet central for maximizing their societal impact. This systematic review aimed to derive evidence-based strategies for science communication from experimental studies. Three databases were searched in December 2022. Experimental studies published in English or German were included if they tested the effect of providing written information about science to adults aged 16+ years by assessing the impact on at least one of four domains of science communication aims (understanding and knowledge, attitudes and trust, intention and behavior, engagement). A total of 171 publications were included. Derived strategies include avoiding jargon, carefully structuring texts, including citations and expert sources, being mindful about how and when to indicate conflict or uncertainty in science, using neutral language, and highlighting Open Science principles and replicability. They can be used to communicate science effectively to lay audiences, benefitting the society.

KW - media psychology

KW - public engagement

KW - science communication

KW - scientific communication

KW - trust in science

KW - Psychology

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85203846160&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1027/2151-2604/a000572

DO - 10.1027/2151-2604/a000572

M3 - Scientific review articles

AN - SCOPUS:85203846160

VL - 233

SP - 40

EP - 51

JO - Zeitschrift für Psychologie

JF - Zeitschrift für Psychologie

SN - 2190-8370

IS - 1

ER -

DOI

Zuletzt angesehen

Publikationen

  1. Identifying governance gaps among interlinked sustainability challenges
  2. Assessing participatory practices in community-based natural resource management: Experiences in community engagement from southern Africa
  3. On Knowing Too Much
  4. Leveraging Governance Performance to Enhance Climate Resilience
  5. An IAD framework analysis of minigrid institutions for sustainable rural electrification in East Africa
  6. Differences in isoprenoid-mediated energy dissipation pathways between coastal and interior Douglas-fir seedlings in response to drought
  7. Utilising learning analytics for study success
  8. Zur ‚Privatisierung‘ von gewaltsamem Protest
  9. Mentoring in schulischen Praxisphasen
  10. Discrete-Point Analysis of the Energy Demand of Primary versus Secondary Metal Production
  11. 2 Thessalonians as pseudepigraphic 'reading instruction' for 1 Thessalonians
  12. Effects of segregation of primary alloying elements on the creep response in magnesium alloys
  13. A path-centric account of action-oriented entrepreneurship training
  14. Understanding self-disclosure on social networking sites - a literature review
  15. Surveying the FAIRness of Annotation Tools: Difficult to find, difficult to reuse
  16. Rózsa Farkas
  17. Waving goodbye to conflict of laws? Recent developments in European Union consumer law
  18. Which Relationality? Whose Personhood?
  19. The roughness of neural networks. Jimi hendrix, holly herndon, GPT-3, timbre transfer and the promising failure aesthetics of musical AIs
  20. Comparison through conversation
  21. Deliberation by, with, and for University Students
  22. Die religiöse Konstante
  23. Analyzing pre- and in-service teachers’ feedback practice with microteaching videos
  24. Fragmente zu einer "Generativen Resonanzästhetik".
  25. Microstructure and corrosion behavior of Mg-Sn-Ca alloys after extrusion
  26. Marktdesign für eine effiziente Netzanbindung von Offshore-Windenergie
  27. Cosmopolitanism in the Wake of Forced Migration.
  28. Lineare Optimierung und Operations Research