Ethik ohne Metaphysik?

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Standard

Ethik ohne Metaphysik? / Schefczyk, Michael.
In: Agora42, No. 12/13, 1992, p. 23-26.

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Schefczyk, M 1992, 'Ethik ohne Metaphysik?', Agora42, no. 12/13, pp. 23-26.

APA

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{09ca5eaaae09451d99d4a88d8060f16e,
title = "Ethik ohne Metaphysik?",
abstract = "The article distinguishes two models of self-realization. The independence model claims that self-realization is compatible with leading a non-moral life, whereas the dependence model argues the converse. Hegel′s influential version of the dependence model aims at showing why and how self-realization must be embedded in a complex structure of reasonable social relations. I argue that Hegel′s dependence model abrogates the „Recht der Besonderheit, sich befriedigt zu finden” and is thus not convincing. What I call Hegel′s “inofficial theory”, however, concedes an infusible conflict between modernity and self-realization; philosophy has to reconcile the individual with the impossibility of being a „ganzer Mensch” in modern societies. After an interlude with Michael Theunissen′s indpendence model, I turn to T. H. Green′s theory of self-realization. Green provides a richer explanatory story than Hegel as to why other-regarding acts contribute to self-realization; however, this story leaves not enough conceptual room for interpersonal conflict and is vulnerable to similar objections to Hegel′s account.",
keywords = "Philosophie",
author = "Michael Schefczyk",
year = "1992",
language = "Deutsch",
pages = "23--26",
journal = "Agora42",
publisher = "DESA-Verlag",
number = "12/13",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Ethik ohne Metaphysik?

AU - Schefczyk, Michael

PY - 1992

Y1 - 1992

N2 - The article distinguishes two models of self-realization. The independence model claims that self-realization is compatible with leading a non-moral life, whereas the dependence model argues the converse. Hegel′s influential version of the dependence model aims at showing why and how self-realization must be embedded in a complex structure of reasonable social relations. I argue that Hegel′s dependence model abrogates the „Recht der Besonderheit, sich befriedigt zu finden” and is thus not convincing. What I call Hegel′s “inofficial theory”, however, concedes an infusible conflict between modernity and self-realization; philosophy has to reconcile the individual with the impossibility of being a „ganzer Mensch” in modern societies. After an interlude with Michael Theunissen′s indpendence model, I turn to T. H. Green′s theory of self-realization. Green provides a richer explanatory story than Hegel as to why other-regarding acts contribute to self-realization; however, this story leaves not enough conceptual room for interpersonal conflict and is vulnerable to similar objections to Hegel′s account.

AB - The article distinguishes two models of self-realization. The independence model claims that self-realization is compatible with leading a non-moral life, whereas the dependence model argues the converse. Hegel′s influential version of the dependence model aims at showing why and how self-realization must be embedded in a complex structure of reasonable social relations. I argue that Hegel′s dependence model abrogates the „Recht der Besonderheit, sich befriedigt zu finden” and is thus not convincing. What I call Hegel′s “inofficial theory”, however, concedes an infusible conflict between modernity and self-realization; philosophy has to reconcile the individual with the impossibility of being a „ganzer Mensch” in modern societies. After an interlude with Michael Theunissen′s indpendence model, I turn to T. H. Green′s theory of self-realization. Green provides a richer explanatory story than Hegel as to why other-regarding acts contribute to self-realization; however, this story leaves not enough conceptual room for interpersonal conflict and is vulnerable to similar objections to Hegel′s account.

KW - Philosophie

M3 - Zeitschriftenaufsätze

SP - 23

EP - 26

JO - Agora42

JF - Agora42

IS - 12/13

ER -

Recently viewed

Publications

  1. Knacken Sie die Karrierenuss!
  2. Südafrika: Historische Lasten
  3. Die Diskursstelle der Medien
  4. Soziale Krisen und Rassismen
  5. Argumentieren und Verhandeln
  6. Reprocessing from the inside
  7. Kommunikationspolitik der EU
  8. Demokratie und Umweltpolitik
  9. Social Exclusion and Housing
  10. Parteien in der Dritten Welt
  11. Marx und Foucault auf Lesbos
  12. A new magnesium alloy system
  13. Rußland und die Dritte Welt
  14. Goffman’s Return to Las Vegas
  15. Advanced extrusion processes
  16. Nutzen – Nutzung - Nutzer_innen
  17. Die neue Parallelgesellschaft
  18. The multipole resonance probe
  19. Ein Kreis mit fünf Sanktionen
  20. Umweltverträglichkeitsprüfung
  21. Parteien ohne Parteilichkeit ?
  22. Reform nach deutschem Vorbild?
  23. Luhmann als Kulturtheoretiker?
  24. Punk - Keine Macht für Niemand
  25. Es geht nicht um einen Dialog
  26. Umweltverträglichkeitsprüfung
  27. Konventionen der Sichtbarkeit
  28. Organization as communication
  29. Luhmann und die Kulturtheorie
  30. Neue Formen der Beschäftigung
  31. Umweltverträglichkeitsprüfung
  32. Organization as Communication
  33. Das Spiel in der Gesellschaft
  34. Consumer information problems
  35. Soziale Netzwerke im Internet
  36. Australia’s Stock Route Network
  37. Australia’s Stock Route Network
  38. 44 VwGO: objektive Klagehäufung
  39. Chinese capitalism in Thailand
  40. Start-up success of freelancers
  41. The path biography methodology
  42. Trainerinnen im Frauenfußball
  43. Magnesium and Magnesium Alloys
  44. Der Preis für Taxikonzessionen
  45. Voices, Bodies and Organization
  46. Gesundheit und Urlaubstourismus
  47. Permanent Night Work in Germany
  48. Ansatz- und Bewertungsstetigkeit
  49. Messung von Markenvorstellungen
  50. Buchhaltung und Jahresabschluss