E-privacy concerns: a facet theoretical approach

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Standard

E-privacy concerns: a facet theoretical approach. / Böhm, Gisela; Pfister, Hans Rüdiger; Ayres-Pereira, Vanessa et al.
In: Journal of Risk Research, Vol. 27, No. 1, 2024, p. 1-20.

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Böhm G, Pfister HR, Ayres-Pereira V, Tjøstheim I. E-privacy concerns: a facet theoretical approach. Journal of Risk Research. 2024;27(1):1-20. doi: 10.1080/13669877.2023.2288012

Bibtex

@article{243dd7cde5974fc0a1a7db8cfe7c0c0e,
title = "E-privacy concerns: a facet theoretical approach",
abstract = "Although the ubiquitous use of smartphones and social media poses serious risks to the privacy of users, research is sparse regarding how users perceive these risks. We present a study investigating the perception of e-privacy risks, assuming that risk perception depends on context and situation, and employing a facet theory approach to define and analyze privacy risk perceptions. Specifically, we define three facets that characterize situations involving an e-privacy risk: Facet A refers to the type of data disclosed, distinguishing three types: a person{\textquoteright}s identity information, information about health, and information about private activities. Facet B refers to the type of actor misusing the information, distinguishing between commercial organizations, public authorities, social networks, and criminal actors. Facet C distinguishes three kinds of harm that might be experienced as a consequence: financial loss, physical harm, and negative psycho-social experiences. Questionnaire items were constructed by creating fictitious but realistic scenarios, each representing a combination of one element from each facet, yielding 36 (3 × 4 × 3) scenarios. For each scenario, respondents rated the likelihood and the negativity of experiencing that scenario. Following the facet theoretical paradigm, item intercorrelations were analyzed via ordinal multidimensional scaling. Results from a representative survey among 500 adult Norwegians yield a distinct partitioning with respect to Facets A and B, called a radex configuration. Facet B (actors) shows an angular partition. Facet C (type of harm) yields a contrast of financial versus psycho-social harm. In sum, we conclude that our three-faceted definition provides a satisfying first approximation to people{\textquoteright}s perception of privacy risks on the Internet while remaining open for extensions with additional facets.",
keywords = "data protection, E-privacy, facet theory, risk perception, social media, Business psychology",
author = "Gisela B{\"o}hm and Pfister, {Hans R{\"u}diger} and Vanessa Ayres-Pereira and Ingvar Tj{\o}stheim",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2023 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.",
year = "2024",
doi = "10.1080/13669877.2023.2288012",
language = "English",
volume = "27",
pages = "1--20",
journal = "Journal of Risk Research",
issn = "1366-9877",
publisher = "Routledge Taylor & Francis Group",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - E-privacy concerns

T2 - a facet theoretical approach

AU - Böhm, Gisela

AU - Pfister, Hans Rüdiger

AU - Ayres-Pereira, Vanessa

AU - Tjøstheim, Ingvar

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.

PY - 2024

Y1 - 2024

N2 - Although the ubiquitous use of smartphones and social media poses serious risks to the privacy of users, research is sparse regarding how users perceive these risks. We present a study investigating the perception of e-privacy risks, assuming that risk perception depends on context and situation, and employing a facet theory approach to define and analyze privacy risk perceptions. Specifically, we define three facets that characterize situations involving an e-privacy risk: Facet A refers to the type of data disclosed, distinguishing three types: a person’s identity information, information about health, and information about private activities. Facet B refers to the type of actor misusing the information, distinguishing between commercial organizations, public authorities, social networks, and criminal actors. Facet C distinguishes three kinds of harm that might be experienced as a consequence: financial loss, physical harm, and negative psycho-social experiences. Questionnaire items were constructed by creating fictitious but realistic scenarios, each representing a combination of one element from each facet, yielding 36 (3 × 4 × 3) scenarios. For each scenario, respondents rated the likelihood and the negativity of experiencing that scenario. Following the facet theoretical paradigm, item intercorrelations were analyzed via ordinal multidimensional scaling. Results from a representative survey among 500 adult Norwegians yield a distinct partitioning with respect to Facets A and B, called a radex configuration. Facet B (actors) shows an angular partition. Facet C (type of harm) yields a contrast of financial versus psycho-social harm. In sum, we conclude that our three-faceted definition provides a satisfying first approximation to people’s perception of privacy risks on the Internet while remaining open for extensions with additional facets.

AB - Although the ubiquitous use of smartphones and social media poses serious risks to the privacy of users, research is sparse regarding how users perceive these risks. We present a study investigating the perception of e-privacy risks, assuming that risk perception depends on context and situation, and employing a facet theory approach to define and analyze privacy risk perceptions. Specifically, we define three facets that characterize situations involving an e-privacy risk: Facet A refers to the type of data disclosed, distinguishing three types: a person’s identity information, information about health, and information about private activities. Facet B refers to the type of actor misusing the information, distinguishing between commercial organizations, public authorities, social networks, and criminal actors. Facet C distinguishes three kinds of harm that might be experienced as a consequence: financial loss, physical harm, and negative psycho-social experiences. Questionnaire items were constructed by creating fictitious but realistic scenarios, each representing a combination of one element from each facet, yielding 36 (3 × 4 × 3) scenarios. For each scenario, respondents rated the likelihood and the negativity of experiencing that scenario. Following the facet theoretical paradigm, item intercorrelations were analyzed via ordinal multidimensional scaling. Results from a representative survey among 500 adult Norwegians yield a distinct partitioning with respect to Facets A and B, called a radex configuration. Facet B (actors) shows an angular partition. Facet C (type of harm) yields a contrast of financial versus psycho-social harm. In sum, we conclude that our three-faceted definition provides a satisfying first approximation to people’s perception of privacy risks on the Internet while remaining open for extensions with additional facets.

KW - data protection

KW - E-privacy

KW - facet theory

KW - risk perception

KW - social media

KW - Business psychology

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85179681306&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/9d9a19b1-a5bb-3f1e-ad63-7287f161844c/

U2 - 10.1080/13669877.2023.2288012

DO - 10.1080/13669877.2023.2288012

M3 - Journal articles

AN - SCOPUS:85179681306

VL - 27

SP - 1

EP - 20

JO - Journal of Risk Research

JF - Journal of Risk Research

SN - 1366-9877

IS - 1

ER -

Recently viewed

Publications

  1. If you call for frameworks in sustainability management... editorial to the special issue
  2. Learning Online: A Comparison of Different Media Types
  3. Dealing with inclusion–teachers’ assessment of internal and external resources
  4. Learning Analytics and Personalized Learning
  5. Continental mapping of forest ecosystem functions reveals a high but unrealised potential for forest multifunctionality.
  6. Along the Path of the Pine, the Parrot, and the Tortoise
  7. Erratum zu
  8. Analysis of the forming behaviour of in-situ drawn sandwich sheets
  9. Beyond academic discourse
  10. Rapid ecosystem change challenges the adaptive capacity of local environmental knowledge
  11. The use of pseudo-causal narratives in EU policies
  12. Exercise program for riders
  13. Diversity Management and Corporate Change: Implications for Co-Determination
  14. A sliding mode control using an extended Kalman filter as an observer for stimulus-responsive polymer fibres as actuator
  15. A Conceptual Structure of Justice - Providing a Tool to Analyse Conceptions of Justice
  16. The Effects of Nonindependent Rater Sets in Multilevel–Multitrait–Multimethod Models
  17. The more severe the merrier: Severity of error consequences stimulates learning from error
  18. Two Mediterranean annuals feature high within-population trait variability and respond differently to a precipitation gradient
  19. Søren Kierkegaard in deutscher Sprache
  20. Navigating (In)Visibility
  21. Managing Green Business Model Transformations
  22. Ethos, Pathos, PowerPoint
  23. Schellings subjektivitätskritik
  24. Rethinking Economic Practices and Values As Assemblages of More-Than-Human Relations
  25. Comprehensive analysis of the forming zone and improvement of diameter reduction prediction in the dieless wire drawing process
  26. Effect of a Web-Based Guided Self-help Intervention for Prevention of Major Depression in Adults With Subthreshold Depression A Randomized Clinical Trial
  27. A framework for evaluating the contribution of transformation products to chemical persistence in the environment
  28. Insights into an Action-Oriented Training Program to Promote Sustainable Entrepreneurship