E-privacy concerns: a facet theoretical approach

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Standard

E-privacy concerns: a facet theoretical approach. / Böhm, Gisela; Pfister, Hans Rüdiger; Ayres-Pereira, Vanessa et al.
In: Journal of Risk Research, Vol. 27, No. 1, 2024, p. 1-20.

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Böhm G, Pfister HR, Ayres-Pereira V, Tjøstheim I. E-privacy concerns: a facet theoretical approach. Journal of Risk Research. 2024;27(1):1-20. doi: 10.1080/13669877.2023.2288012

Bibtex

@article{243dd7cde5974fc0a1a7db8cfe7c0c0e,
title = "E-privacy concerns: a facet theoretical approach",
abstract = "Although the ubiquitous use of smartphones and social media poses serious risks to the privacy of users, research is sparse regarding how users perceive these risks. We present a study investigating the perception of e-privacy risks, assuming that risk perception depends on context and situation, and employing a facet theory approach to define and analyze privacy risk perceptions. Specifically, we define three facets that characterize situations involving an e-privacy risk: Facet A refers to the type of data disclosed, distinguishing three types: a person{\textquoteright}s identity information, information about health, and information about private activities. Facet B refers to the type of actor misusing the information, distinguishing between commercial organizations, public authorities, social networks, and criminal actors. Facet C distinguishes three kinds of harm that might be experienced as a consequence: financial loss, physical harm, and negative psycho-social experiences. Questionnaire items were constructed by creating fictitious but realistic scenarios, each representing a combination of one element from each facet, yielding 36 (3 × 4 × 3) scenarios. For each scenario, respondents rated the likelihood and the negativity of experiencing that scenario. Following the facet theoretical paradigm, item intercorrelations were analyzed via ordinal multidimensional scaling. Results from a representative survey among 500 adult Norwegians yield a distinct partitioning with respect to Facets A and B, called a radex configuration. Facet B (actors) shows an angular partition. Facet C (type of harm) yields a contrast of financial versus psycho-social harm. In sum, we conclude that our three-faceted definition provides a satisfying first approximation to people{\textquoteright}s perception of privacy risks on the Internet while remaining open for extensions with additional facets.",
keywords = "data protection, E-privacy, facet theory, risk perception, social media, Business psychology",
author = "Gisela B{\"o}hm and Pfister, {Hans R{\"u}diger} and Vanessa Ayres-Pereira and Ingvar Tj{\o}stheim",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2023 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.",
year = "2024",
doi = "10.1080/13669877.2023.2288012",
language = "English",
volume = "27",
pages = "1--20",
journal = "Journal of Risk Research",
issn = "1366-9877",
publisher = "Routledge Taylor & Francis Group",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - E-privacy concerns

T2 - a facet theoretical approach

AU - Böhm, Gisela

AU - Pfister, Hans Rüdiger

AU - Ayres-Pereira, Vanessa

AU - Tjøstheim, Ingvar

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.

PY - 2024

Y1 - 2024

N2 - Although the ubiquitous use of smartphones and social media poses serious risks to the privacy of users, research is sparse regarding how users perceive these risks. We present a study investigating the perception of e-privacy risks, assuming that risk perception depends on context and situation, and employing a facet theory approach to define and analyze privacy risk perceptions. Specifically, we define three facets that characterize situations involving an e-privacy risk: Facet A refers to the type of data disclosed, distinguishing three types: a person’s identity information, information about health, and information about private activities. Facet B refers to the type of actor misusing the information, distinguishing between commercial organizations, public authorities, social networks, and criminal actors. Facet C distinguishes three kinds of harm that might be experienced as a consequence: financial loss, physical harm, and negative psycho-social experiences. Questionnaire items were constructed by creating fictitious but realistic scenarios, each representing a combination of one element from each facet, yielding 36 (3 × 4 × 3) scenarios. For each scenario, respondents rated the likelihood and the negativity of experiencing that scenario. Following the facet theoretical paradigm, item intercorrelations were analyzed via ordinal multidimensional scaling. Results from a representative survey among 500 adult Norwegians yield a distinct partitioning with respect to Facets A and B, called a radex configuration. Facet B (actors) shows an angular partition. Facet C (type of harm) yields a contrast of financial versus psycho-social harm. In sum, we conclude that our three-faceted definition provides a satisfying first approximation to people’s perception of privacy risks on the Internet while remaining open for extensions with additional facets.

AB - Although the ubiquitous use of smartphones and social media poses serious risks to the privacy of users, research is sparse regarding how users perceive these risks. We present a study investigating the perception of e-privacy risks, assuming that risk perception depends on context and situation, and employing a facet theory approach to define and analyze privacy risk perceptions. Specifically, we define three facets that characterize situations involving an e-privacy risk: Facet A refers to the type of data disclosed, distinguishing three types: a person’s identity information, information about health, and information about private activities. Facet B refers to the type of actor misusing the information, distinguishing between commercial organizations, public authorities, social networks, and criminal actors. Facet C distinguishes three kinds of harm that might be experienced as a consequence: financial loss, physical harm, and negative psycho-social experiences. Questionnaire items were constructed by creating fictitious but realistic scenarios, each representing a combination of one element from each facet, yielding 36 (3 × 4 × 3) scenarios. For each scenario, respondents rated the likelihood and the negativity of experiencing that scenario. Following the facet theoretical paradigm, item intercorrelations were analyzed via ordinal multidimensional scaling. Results from a representative survey among 500 adult Norwegians yield a distinct partitioning with respect to Facets A and B, called a radex configuration. Facet B (actors) shows an angular partition. Facet C (type of harm) yields a contrast of financial versus psycho-social harm. In sum, we conclude that our three-faceted definition provides a satisfying first approximation to people’s perception of privacy risks on the Internet while remaining open for extensions with additional facets.

KW - data protection

KW - E-privacy

KW - facet theory

KW - risk perception

KW - social media

KW - Business psychology

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85179681306&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/9d9a19b1-a5bb-3f1e-ad63-7287f161844c/

U2 - 10.1080/13669877.2023.2288012

DO - 10.1080/13669877.2023.2288012

M3 - Journal articles

AN - SCOPUS:85179681306

VL - 27

SP - 1

EP - 20

JO - Journal of Risk Research

JF - Journal of Risk Research

SN - 1366-9877

IS - 1

ER -

Recently viewed

Publications

  1. Geometric control tools for robotic manipulators
  2. Using Reading Strategy Training to Foster Students´ Mathematical Modelling Competencies
  3. On-Board-Diagnose und On-Board-Measurement
  4. Circular and inclusive utilization of alternative proteins
  5. Programmed Visions
  6. Conveying the Ethics of Artificial Intelligence in K–12 and Academia: A Systematic Review of Teaching Methods
  7. Von „effective control“ zu „contactless control“?
  8. Soziale Netzwerke im Internet
  9. Lernzielorientierung
  10. I share because of who I am: values, identities, norms, and attitudes explain sharing intentions
  11. The Measurement of Grip-Strength in Automobiles
  12. Internet-Based Guided Self-Help for Vaginal Penetration Difficulties
  13. How to Curate Diversity and Otherness in Global Performance Art
  14. Vision Statement for the Planet in 2050
  15. Integrated driver rostering problem in public bus transit
  16. Bolt load retention and creep response of AS41 alloyed with 0.15% Ca
  17. Silent reading fluency and comprehension in bilingual children
  18. Antidumping
  19. Elevated temperature and varied load response of AS41 at bolted joint
  20. The practical wisdom of Peter Drucker
  21. Spaces with a temper
  22. Credit Constraints and Exports
  23. Complexity as experience
  24. Living on the slopes: entrepreneurial preparedness in a context under continuous threat
  25. What is Social Learning?
  26. Introduction
  27. Thermodynamic formulation of models for multiscale crystal plasticity at large deformation
  28. Discussion report part 3
  29. From farm to factory. Vertical trading and processing structures between industrial and developing countries in the international tobacco-economy
  30. Zwischen "Partisanenkampf" und "Kommissar Computer"
  31. Automated Delivery
  32. Towards a critical understanding of work in ecological economics
  33. Network measures of mixing
  34. Extrusion of profiles with variable wall thickness
  35. Identity affirmation and social movement support
  36. Contributing to sustainable development pathways in the South Pacific through transdisciplinary research
  37. Comity
  38. User experience and behavior concerning digital scaffolding during EFL speaking practice
  39. 再生可能エネルギー促進に向けたドイツの法的ステップ
  40. Accelerating the industrial transition with safe-and-sustainable-by-design (SSbD)