E-privacy concerns: a facet theoretical approach

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Standard

E-privacy concerns: a facet theoretical approach. / Böhm, Gisela; Pfister, Hans Rüdiger; Ayres-Pereira, Vanessa et al.
In: Journal of Risk Research, Vol. 27, No. 1, 2024, p. 1-20.

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Böhm G, Pfister HR, Ayres-Pereira V, Tjøstheim I. E-privacy concerns: a facet theoretical approach. Journal of Risk Research. 2024;27(1):1-20. doi: 10.1080/13669877.2023.2288012

Bibtex

@article{243dd7cde5974fc0a1a7db8cfe7c0c0e,
title = "E-privacy concerns: a facet theoretical approach",
abstract = "Although the ubiquitous use of smartphones and social media poses serious risks to the privacy of users, research is sparse regarding how users perceive these risks. We present a study investigating the perception of e-privacy risks, assuming that risk perception depends on context and situation, and employing a facet theory approach to define and analyze privacy risk perceptions. Specifically, we define three facets that characterize situations involving an e-privacy risk: Facet A refers to the type of data disclosed, distinguishing three types: a person{\textquoteright}s identity information, information about health, and information about private activities. Facet B refers to the type of actor misusing the information, distinguishing between commercial organizations, public authorities, social networks, and criminal actors. Facet C distinguishes three kinds of harm that might be experienced as a consequence: financial loss, physical harm, and negative psycho-social experiences. Questionnaire items were constructed by creating fictitious but realistic scenarios, each representing a combination of one element from each facet, yielding 36 (3 × 4 × 3) scenarios. For each scenario, respondents rated the likelihood and the negativity of experiencing that scenario. Following the facet theoretical paradigm, item intercorrelations were analyzed via ordinal multidimensional scaling. Results from a representative survey among 500 adult Norwegians yield a distinct partitioning with respect to Facets A and B, called a radex configuration. Facet B (actors) shows an angular partition. Facet C (type of harm) yields a contrast of financial versus psycho-social harm. In sum, we conclude that our three-faceted definition provides a satisfying first approximation to people{\textquoteright}s perception of privacy risks on the Internet while remaining open for extensions with additional facets.",
keywords = "data protection, E-privacy, facet theory, risk perception, social media, Business psychology",
author = "Gisela B{\"o}hm and Pfister, {Hans R{\"u}diger} and Vanessa Ayres-Pereira and Ingvar Tj{\o}stheim",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2023 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.",
year = "2024",
doi = "10.1080/13669877.2023.2288012",
language = "English",
volume = "27",
pages = "1--20",
journal = "Journal of Risk Research",
issn = "1366-9877",
publisher = "Routledge Taylor & Francis Group",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - E-privacy concerns

T2 - a facet theoretical approach

AU - Böhm, Gisela

AU - Pfister, Hans Rüdiger

AU - Ayres-Pereira, Vanessa

AU - Tjøstheim, Ingvar

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.

PY - 2024

Y1 - 2024

N2 - Although the ubiquitous use of smartphones and social media poses serious risks to the privacy of users, research is sparse regarding how users perceive these risks. We present a study investigating the perception of e-privacy risks, assuming that risk perception depends on context and situation, and employing a facet theory approach to define and analyze privacy risk perceptions. Specifically, we define three facets that characterize situations involving an e-privacy risk: Facet A refers to the type of data disclosed, distinguishing three types: a person’s identity information, information about health, and information about private activities. Facet B refers to the type of actor misusing the information, distinguishing between commercial organizations, public authorities, social networks, and criminal actors. Facet C distinguishes three kinds of harm that might be experienced as a consequence: financial loss, physical harm, and negative psycho-social experiences. Questionnaire items were constructed by creating fictitious but realistic scenarios, each representing a combination of one element from each facet, yielding 36 (3 × 4 × 3) scenarios. For each scenario, respondents rated the likelihood and the negativity of experiencing that scenario. Following the facet theoretical paradigm, item intercorrelations were analyzed via ordinal multidimensional scaling. Results from a representative survey among 500 adult Norwegians yield a distinct partitioning with respect to Facets A and B, called a radex configuration. Facet B (actors) shows an angular partition. Facet C (type of harm) yields a contrast of financial versus psycho-social harm. In sum, we conclude that our three-faceted definition provides a satisfying first approximation to people’s perception of privacy risks on the Internet while remaining open for extensions with additional facets.

AB - Although the ubiquitous use of smartphones and social media poses serious risks to the privacy of users, research is sparse regarding how users perceive these risks. We present a study investigating the perception of e-privacy risks, assuming that risk perception depends on context and situation, and employing a facet theory approach to define and analyze privacy risk perceptions. Specifically, we define three facets that characterize situations involving an e-privacy risk: Facet A refers to the type of data disclosed, distinguishing three types: a person’s identity information, information about health, and information about private activities. Facet B refers to the type of actor misusing the information, distinguishing between commercial organizations, public authorities, social networks, and criminal actors. Facet C distinguishes three kinds of harm that might be experienced as a consequence: financial loss, physical harm, and negative psycho-social experiences. Questionnaire items were constructed by creating fictitious but realistic scenarios, each representing a combination of one element from each facet, yielding 36 (3 × 4 × 3) scenarios. For each scenario, respondents rated the likelihood and the negativity of experiencing that scenario. Following the facet theoretical paradigm, item intercorrelations were analyzed via ordinal multidimensional scaling. Results from a representative survey among 500 adult Norwegians yield a distinct partitioning with respect to Facets A and B, called a radex configuration. Facet B (actors) shows an angular partition. Facet C (type of harm) yields a contrast of financial versus psycho-social harm. In sum, we conclude that our three-faceted definition provides a satisfying first approximation to people’s perception of privacy risks on the Internet while remaining open for extensions with additional facets.

KW - data protection

KW - E-privacy

KW - facet theory

KW - risk perception

KW - social media

KW - Business psychology

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85179681306&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/9d9a19b1-a5bb-3f1e-ad63-7287f161844c/

U2 - 10.1080/13669877.2023.2288012

DO - 10.1080/13669877.2023.2288012

M3 - Journal articles

AN - SCOPUS:85179681306

VL - 27

SP - 1

EP - 20

JO - Journal of Risk Research

JF - Journal of Risk Research

SN - 1366-9877

IS - 1

ER -

Recently viewed

Publications

  1. Teaching Sustainable Development in a Sensory and Artful Way — Concepts, Methods, and Examples
  2. Assembly history modulates vertical root distribution in a grassland experiment
  3. God cannot always forgive. Reading Mt 18:21-35 with children
  4. Coping with concept drift in a virtual metrology application to predict part quality in micro gear manufacturing
  5. Exports and productivity
  6. Welcome to the Glitch and Make Some Noise: Understanding Media through Audio Hacking
  7. Testing socio-cultural valuation methods of ecosystem services to explain land use preferences
  8. A Decision Support System for Crew Rostering in Public Transit
  9. Mindfulness as self-confirmation? An exploratory intervention study on potentials and limitations of mindfulness-based interventions in the context of environmental and sustainability education
  10. Pathways towards sustainable and just futures with and for disabled populations
  11. Perceptron and SVM learning with generalized cost models
  12. CSR communication on corporate websites compared across continents
  13. The parrot knew everything
  14. Time-varying persistence in real oil prices and its determinant
  15. Leaf Attenuated Total Reflection Fourier Transform Infrared (ATR-FTIR) biochemical profile of grassland plant species related to land-use intensity
  16. Meta-custom and the court
  17. Adaptive acquisition planning for visual inspection in remanufacturing using reinforcement learning
  18. Higher Wages in Exporting Firms: Self-Selection, Export Effect, or Both?
  19. Richard Powers – Literatur als Programm
  20. Mietmodell Software Adobe
  21. Development of environmentally biodegradable drugs
  22. From event management to managing events
  23. Complexity Measures of Traffic Scenarios
  24. Industry Transformations for High Service Provisioning with Lower Energy and Material Demand
  25. Manager’s misinterpretation of goodwill impairments
  26. Mechanical properties and corrosion behavior of Mg-Gd-Ca-Zr alloys for medical applications
  27. Das 6-Punkte-Programm für besseres Reiten
  28. Forgetting fire
  29. Unterschriftenregelung/Vertretung
  30. Jonathan Swift, Travels into Several Remote Nations of the World
  31. Gab es wirklich eine Sintflut?
  32. Die Shoah im Bild
  33. An overview of European programs to support energy projects in Africa and strategies to involve the private sector
  34. Web-based support for daily functioning of people with mild intellectual disabilities or chronic psychiatric disorders
  35. Themes in the development of emotion regulation in childhood and adolescence and a transactional model
  36. Career engagement