E-privacy concerns: a facet theoretical approach

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Standard

E-privacy concerns: a facet theoretical approach. / Böhm, Gisela; Pfister, Hans Rüdiger; Ayres-Pereira, Vanessa et al.
In: Journal of Risk Research, Vol. 27, No. 1, 2024, p. 1-20.

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Böhm G, Pfister HR, Ayres-Pereira V, Tjøstheim I. E-privacy concerns: a facet theoretical approach. Journal of Risk Research. 2024;27(1):1-20. doi: 10.1080/13669877.2023.2288012

Bibtex

@article{243dd7cde5974fc0a1a7db8cfe7c0c0e,
title = "E-privacy concerns: a facet theoretical approach",
abstract = "Although the ubiquitous use of smartphones and social media poses serious risks to the privacy of users, research is sparse regarding how users perceive these risks. We present a study investigating the perception of e-privacy risks, assuming that risk perception depends on context and situation, and employing a facet theory approach to define and analyze privacy risk perceptions. Specifically, we define three facets that characterize situations involving an e-privacy risk: Facet A refers to the type of data disclosed, distinguishing three types: a person{\textquoteright}s identity information, information about health, and information about private activities. Facet B refers to the type of actor misusing the information, distinguishing between commercial organizations, public authorities, social networks, and criminal actors. Facet C distinguishes three kinds of harm that might be experienced as a consequence: financial loss, physical harm, and negative psycho-social experiences. Questionnaire items were constructed by creating fictitious but realistic scenarios, each representing a combination of one element from each facet, yielding 36 (3 × 4 × 3) scenarios. For each scenario, respondents rated the likelihood and the negativity of experiencing that scenario. Following the facet theoretical paradigm, item intercorrelations were analyzed via ordinal multidimensional scaling. Results from a representative survey among 500 adult Norwegians yield a distinct partitioning with respect to Facets A and B, called a radex configuration. Facet B (actors) shows an angular partition. Facet C (type of harm) yields a contrast of financial versus psycho-social harm. In sum, we conclude that our three-faceted definition provides a satisfying first approximation to people{\textquoteright}s perception of privacy risks on the Internet while remaining open for extensions with additional facets.",
keywords = "data protection, E-privacy, facet theory, risk perception, social media, Business psychology",
author = "Gisela B{\"o}hm and Pfister, {Hans R{\"u}diger} and Vanessa Ayres-Pereira and Ingvar Tj{\o}stheim",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2023 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.",
year = "2024",
doi = "10.1080/13669877.2023.2288012",
language = "English",
volume = "27",
pages = "1--20",
journal = "Journal of Risk Research",
issn = "1366-9877",
publisher = "Routledge Taylor & Francis Group",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - E-privacy concerns

T2 - a facet theoretical approach

AU - Böhm, Gisela

AU - Pfister, Hans Rüdiger

AU - Ayres-Pereira, Vanessa

AU - Tjøstheim, Ingvar

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.

PY - 2024

Y1 - 2024

N2 - Although the ubiquitous use of smartphones and social media poses serious risks to the privacy of users, research is sparse regarding how users perceive these risks. We present a study investigating the perception of e-privacy risks, assuming that risk perception depends on context and situation, and employing a facet theory approach to define and analyze privacy risk perceptions. Specifically, we define three facets that characterize situations involving an e-privacy risk: Facet A refers to the type of data disclosed, distinguishing three types: a person’s identity information, information about health, and information about private activities. Facet B refers to the type of actor misusing the information, distinguishing between commercial organizations, public authorities, social networks, and criminal actors. Facet C distinguishes three kinds of harm that might be experienced as a consequence: financial loss, physical harm, and negative psycho-social experiences. Questionnaire items were constructed by creating fictitious but realistic scenarios, each representing a combination of one element from each facet, yielding 36 (3 × 4 × 3) scenarios. For each scenario, respondents rated the likelihood and the negativity of experiencing that scenario. Following the facet theoretical paradigm, item intercorrelations were analyzed via ordinal multidimensional scaling. Results from a representative survey among 500 adult Norwegians yield a distinct partitioning with respect to Facets A and B, called a radex configuration. Facet B (actors) shows an angular partition. Facet C (type of harm) yields a contrast of financial versus psycho-social harm. In sum, we conclude that our three-faceted definition provides a satisfying first approximation to people’s perception of privacy risks on the Internet while remaining open for extensions with additional facets.

AB - Although the ubiquitous use of smartphones and social media poses serious risks to the privacy of users, research is sparse regarding how users perceive these risks. We present a study investigating the perception of e-privacy risks, assuming that risk perception depends on context and situation, and employing a facet theory approach to define and analyze privacy risk perceptions. Specifically, we define three facets that characterize situations involving an e-privacy risk: Facet A refers to the type of data disclosed, distinguishing three types: a person’s identity information, information about health, and information about private activities. Facet B refers to the type of actor misusing the information, distinguishing between commercial organizations, public authorities, social networks, and criminal actors. Facet C distinguishes three kinds of harm that might be experienced as a consequence: financial loss, physical harm, and negative psycho-social experiences. Questionnaire items were constructed by creating fictitious but realistic scenarios, each representing a combination of one element from each facet, yielding 36 (3 × 4 × 3) scenarios. For each scenario, respondents rated the likelihood and the negativity of experiencing that scenario. Following the facet theoretical paradigm, item intercorrelations were analyzed via ordinal multidimensional scaling. Results from a representative survey among 500 adult Norwegians yield a distinct partitioning with respect to Facets A and B, called a radex configuration. Facet B (actors) shows an angular partition. Facet C (type of harm) yields a contrast of financial versus psycho-social harm. In sum, we conclude that our three-faceted definition provides a satisfying first approximation to people’s perception of privacy risks on the Internet while remaining open for extensions with additional facets.

KW - data protection

KW - E-privacy

KW - facet theory

KW - risk perception

KW - social media

KW - Business psychology

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85179681306&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/9d9a19b1-a5bb-3f1e-ad63-7287f161844c/

U2 - 10.1080/13669877.2023.2288012

DO - 10.1080/13669877.2023.2288012

M3 - Journal articles

AN - SCOPUS:85179681306

VL - 27

SP - 1

EP - 20

JO - Journal of Risk Research

JF - Journal of Risk Research

SN - 1366-9877

IS - 1

ER -

Recently viewed

Researchers

  1. Neele Puhlmann

Publications

  1. Contrasting requests in Inner Circle Englishes
  2. Effectiveness of a Guided Internet- and Mobile-Based Intervention for Patients with Chronic Back Pain and Depression (WARD-BP): A Multicenter, Pragmatic Randomized Controlled Trial
  3. Exploring the dark and unexpected sides of digitalization
  4. Material flow analysis between dynamic modelling and life cycle assessment
  5. Markups and Concentration in the Context of Digitization
  6. Advancing understanding of natural resource governance
  7. Ensuring the Long-Term Provision of Heathland Ecosystem Services—The Importance of a Functional Perspective in Management Decision Frameworks
  8. Modeling and simulation of the heterogenous material behavior in thermal-sprayed coatings
  9. Does isolation affect phenotypic variability and fluctuating asymmetry in the endangered Red Apollo?
  10. Dynamic control of internal force for visco-elastic contact grasps
  11. Atomic Animals
  12. Tree cover mediates the effect on rapeseed leaf damage of excluding predatory arthropods, but in an unexpected way
  13. Disentangling trade-offs and synergies around ecosystem services with the influence network framework
  14. Using Daily Stretching to Counteract Performance Decreases as a Result of Reduced Physical Activity—A Controlled Trial
  15. The Radius of Trust Problem Remains Resolved
  16. Fruit Detection and Yield Mass Estimation from a UAV Based RGB Dense Cloud for an Apple Orchard
  17. What drives the spatial distribution and dynamics of local species richness in tropical forest?
  18. Towards a Concept for Integrating IT Innovation Management into Business IT Management
  19. Grounds different from, though equally solid with
  20. Reframing the technosphere
  21. Using Reading Strategy Training to Foster Students´ Mathematical Modelling Competencies
  22. Communicating Uncertainties About the Effects of Medical Interventions Using Different Display Formats
  23. Solvable problems or problematic solvability?
  24. Electrical and Mechanical Characterization of Polymer Nanofibers for Sensor Application
  25. Variational pragmatics in the foreign language classroom
  26. Assessment of cognitive load in multimedia learning with dual-task methodology
  27. Consequences of extreme weather events for developing countries based on the example of Mongolia