Degrees of Integration: How a Fragmented Entrepreneurial Ecosystem Promotes Different Types of Entrepreneurs

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Standard

Degrees of Integration: How a Fragmented Entrepreneurial Ecosystem Promotes Different Types of Entrepreneurs. / Scheidgen, Katharina.
In: Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, Vol. 33, No. 1-2, 01.01.2021, p. 54-79.

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{e192f3483c674d828829b0b2b0d875c0,
title = "Degrees of Integration: How a Fragmented Entrepreneurial Ecosystem Promotes Different Types of Entrepreneurs",
abstract = "Entrepreneurial Ecosystems (EEs) are expected to support high growth entrepreneurship. Yet, little is known about how they actually promote entrepreneurial activities. Based on Giddens{\textquoteright} structuration theory, this paper takes the entrepreneurs{\textquoteright} perspective to understand how they actually use the resources provided by an EE. Based on semi-structured interviews with entrepreneurs and other relevant actors in the Berlin EE along with participant observation at entrepreneurship events, this case study focuses on the resourcing practices of different types of entrepreneurs. It shows that the Berlin EE comprises two distinct subsystems. On the basis of this evidence it is proposed that EEs can have different degrees of integration and that this characteristic strongly impacts how entrepreneurs can actually acquire resources from the EE and thus how specific EEs promote different types of entrepreneurs. Heterogeneous structures therefore do not only exist between EEs but also within EEs. This heterogeneity needs to be recognized in order to understand how EEs function, enhance the comparability of research results, and design suitable political instruments to promote entrepreneurship effectively.",
keywords = "Management studies, Entrepreneurship, Entrepreneurial ecosystems, resourcing practices, structuration theory, high-growth entrepreneurship, university spin-offs",
author = "Katharina Scheidgen",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2020 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.",
year = "2021",
month = jan,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1080/08985626.2020.1734263",
language = "English",
volume = "33",
pages = "54--79",
journal = "Entrepreneurship and Regional Development",
issn = "0898-5626",
publisher = "Routledge Taylor & Francis Group",
number = "1-2",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Degrees of Integration

T2 - How a Fragmented Entrepreneurial Ecosystem Promotes Different Types of Entrepreneurs

AU - Scheidgen, Katharina

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2020 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.

PY - 2021/1/1

Y1 - 2021/1/1

N2 - Entrepreneurial Ecosystems (EEs) are expected to support high growth entrepreneurship. Yet, little is known about how they actually promote entrepreneurial activities. Based on Giddens’ structuration theory, this paper takes the entrepreneurs’ perspective to understand how they actually use the resources provided by an EE. Based on semi-structured interviews with entrepreneurs and other relevant actors in the Berlin EE along with participant observation at entrepreneurship events, this case study focuses on the resourcing practices of different types of entrepreneurs. It shows that the Berlin EE comprises two distinct subsystems. On the basis of this evidence it is proposed that EEs can have different degrees of integration and that this characteristic strongly impacts how entrepreneurs can actually acquire resources from the EE and thus how specific EEs promote different types of entrepreneurs. Heterogeneous structures therefore do not only exist between EEs but also within EEs. This heterogeneity needs to be recognized in order to understand how EEs function, enhance the comparability of research results, and design suitable political instruments to promote entrepreneurship effectively.

AB - Entrepreneurial Ecosystems (EEs) are expected to support high growth entrepreneurship. Yet, little is known about how they actually promote entrepreneurial activities. Based on Giddens’ structuration theory, this paper takes the entrepreneurs’ perspective to understand how they actually use the resources provided by an EE. Based on semi-structured interviews with entrepreneurs and other relevant actors in the Berlin EE along with participant observation at entrepreneurship events, this case study focuses on the resourcing practices of different types of entrepreneurs. It shows that the Berlin EE comprises two distinct subsystems. On the basis of this evidence it is proposed that EEs can have different degrees of integration and that this characteristic strongly impacts how entrepreneurs can actually acquire resources from the EE and thus how specific EEs promote different types of entrepreneurs. Heterogeneous structures therefore do not only exist between EEs but also within EEs. This heterogeneity needs to be recognized in order to understand how EEs function, enhance the comparability of research results, and design suitable political instruments to promote entrepreneurship effectively.

KW - Management studies

KW - Entrepreneurship

KW - Entrepreneurial ecosystems

KW - resourcing practices

KW - structuration theory

KW - high-growth entrepreneurship

KW - university spin-offs

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85080997097&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/08985626.2020.1734263

DO - 10.1080/08985626.2020.1734263

M3 - Journal articles

VL - 33

SP - 54

EP - 79

JO - Entrepreneurship and Regional Development

JF - Entrepreneurship and Regional Development

SN - 0898-5626

IS - 1-2

ER -

Recently viewed

Publications

  1. On the combined effect of soil fertility and topography on tree growth in subtropical forest ecosystems - a study from SE China
  2. Liveness Formats
  3. Automated system for measuring the radial clearance of rolling bearings
  4. Quo Vadis, Umweltinformatik? 6. Workshop
  5. End-users’ perspective on digitalization
  6. Impacts of offshore wind farms on sediment structure and the water column during construction, and changes in bottom topography during the operation phase
  7. Attachment disorder and attachment theory – Two sides of one medal or two different coins?
  8. The politics of (non)knowledge in the (un)making of migration
  9. Embodiment of Science in Science Slams.
  10. Techno-economic assessment of non-sterile batch and continuous production of lactic acid from food waste
  11. Mathematical Chemistry and Chemoinformatics
  12. The micro-processes during repatriate knowledge transfer
  13. Stabilizing the grid with regional virtual power plants
  14. Green your community click by click
  15. Elementary School Students’ Length Estimation Skills
  16. Visualizing stakeholders’ willingness for collective action in participatory scenario planning
  17. Hands in Focus: Sign Language Recognition Via Top-Down Attention
  18. Shared Storybook Reading and Oral Language Development
  19. Utilization of protein-rich residues in biotechnological processes
  20. Atomic Animals
  21. Separating Cognitive and Content Domains in Mathematical Competence
  22. Digital Design Strategies
  23. Healthier and Sustainable Food Systems: Integrating Underutilised Crops in a ‘Theory of Change Approach’
  24. Determinants of fair own wage perceptions
  25. Pathways to Implementation: Evidence on How Participation in Environmental Governance Impacts on Environmental Outcomes
  26. Overview of a Proposed Ecological Risk Assessment Process for Honey bees (Apis mellifera) and Non‐Apis Bees
  27. Symmetrical Communication?
  28. Be smart, play dumb? A transactional perspective on day-specific knowledge hiding, interpersonal conflict, and psychological strain
  29. Is there a compensating wage differential for high crime levels?
  30. Knowledge Production in Consulting Teams: A Self-Organization Approach