Degrees of Integration: How a Fragmented Entrepreneurial Ecosystem Promotes Different Types of Entrepreneurs

Publikation: Beiträge in ZeitschriftenZeitschriftenaufsätzeForschungbegutachtet

Standard

Degrees of Integration: How a Fragmented Entrepreneurial Ecosystem Promotes Different Types of Entrepreneurs. / Scheidgen, Katharina.
in: Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, Jahrgang 33, Nr. 1-2, 01.01.2021, S. 54-79.

Publikation: Beiträge in ZeitschriftenZeitschriftenaufsätzeForschungbegutachtet

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{e192f3483c674d828829b0b2b0d875c0,
title = "Degrees of Integration: How a Fragmented Entrepreneurial Ecosystem Promotes Different Types of Entrepreneurs",
abstract = "Entrepreneurial Ecosystems (EEs) are expected to support high growth entrepreneurship. Yet, little is known about how they actually promote entrepreneurial activities. Based on Giddens{\textquoteright} structuration theory, this paper takes the entrepreneurs{\textquoteright} perspective to understand how they actually use the resources provided by an EE. Based on semi-structured interviews with entrepreneurs and other relevant actors in the Berlin EE along with participant observation at entrepreneurship events, this case study focuses on the resourcing practices of different types of entrepreneurs. It shows that the Berlin EE comprises two distinct subsystems. On the basis of this evidence it is proposed that EEs can have different degrees of integration and that this characteristic strongly impacts how entrepreneurs can actually acquire resources from the EE and thus how specific EEs promote different types of entrepreneurs. Heterogeneous structures therefore do not only exist between EEs but also within EEs. This heterogeneity needs to be recognized in order to understand how EEs function, enhance the comparability of research results, and design suitable political instruments to promote entrepreneurship effectively.",
keywords = "Management studies, Entrepreneurship, Entrepreneurial ecosystems, resourcing practices, structuration theory, high-growth entrepreneurship, university spin-offs",
author = "Katharina Scheidgen",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2020 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.",
year = "2021",
month = jan,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1080/08985626.2020.1734263",
language = "English",
volume = "33",
pages = "54--79",
journal = "Entrepreneurship and Regional Development",
issn = "0898-5626",
publisher = "Routledge Taylor & Francis Group",
number = "1-2",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Degrees of Integration

T2 - How a Fragmented Entrepreneurial Ecosystem Promotes Different Types of Entrepreneurs

AU - Scheidgen, Katharina

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2020 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.

PY - 2021/1/1

Y1 - 2021/1/1

N2 - Entrepreneurial Ecosystems (EEs) are expected to support high growth entrepreneurship. Yet, little is known about how they actually promote entrepreneurial activities. Based on Giddens’ structuration theory, this paper takes the entrepreneurs’ perspective to understand how they actually use the resources provided by an EE. Based on semi-structured interviews with entrepreneurs and other relevant actors in the Berlin EE along with participant observation at entrepreneurship events, this case study focuses on the resourcing practices of different types of entrepreneurs. It shows that the Berlin EE comprises two distinct subsystems. On the basis of this evidence it is proposed that EEs can have different degrees of integration and that this characteristic strongly impacts how entrepreneurs can actually acquire resources from the EE and thus how specific EEs promote different types of entrepreneurs. Heterogeneous structures therefore do not only exist between EEs but also within EEs. This heterogeneity needs to be recognized in order to understand how EEs function, enhance the comparability of research results, and design suitable political instruments to promote entrepreneurship effectively.

AB - Entrepreneurial Ecosystems (EEs) are expected to support high growth entrepreneurship. Yet, little is known about how they actually promote entrepreneurial activities. Based on Giddens’ structuration theory, this paper takes the entrepreneurs’ perspective to understand how they actually use the resources provided by an EE. Based on semi-structured interviews with entrepreneurs and other relevant actors in the Berlin EE along with participant observation at entrepreneurship events, this case study focuses on the resourcing practices of different types of entrepreneurs. It shows that the Berlin EE comprises two distinct subsystems. On the basis of this evidence it is proposed that EEs can have different degrees of integration and that this characteristic strongly impacts how entrepreneurs can actually acquire resources from the EE and thus how specific EEs promote different types of entrepreneurs. Heterogeneous structures therefore do not only exist between EEs but also within EEs. This heterogeneity needs to be recognized in order to understand how EEs function, enhance the comparability of research results, and design suitable political instruments to promote entrepreneurship effectively.

KW - Management studies

KW - Entrepreneurship

KW - Entrepreneurial ecosystems

KW - resourcing practices

KW - structuration theory

KW - high-growth entrepreneurship

KW - university spin-offs

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85080997097&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/08985626.2020.1734263

DO - 10.1080/08985626.2020.1734263

M3 - Journal articles

VL - 33

SP - 54

EP - 79

JO - Entrepreneurship and Regional Development

JF - Entrepreneurship and Regional Development

SN - 0898-5626

IS - 1-2

ER -

DOI

Zuletzt angesehen

Publikationen

  1. Transindividuelle Affizierung
  2. Communication spaces - memory spaces. Articles on transcultural encounter in Africa
  3. Groundwater intrusion into leaky sewer systems
  4. Evidence-Based Management and Organizational Reality
  5. Managing depression in older age
  6. A hypersingular integral equation for the floating body problem
  7. Utilization of phenolic compounds by microalgae
  8. Measuring Method Effects
  9. Unchanged food approach-avoidance behaviour of healthy men after oxytocin administration
  10. A contingency approach to small-scale business success
  11. Transport in dynamical astronomy and multibody problems
  12. Käsemann, Ernst
  13. Nutzen Sie die "Aufmerksamkeit"
  14. Leverage points for improving gender equality and human well-being in a smallholder farming context
  15. The impact of distributed leadership on teacher commitment
  16. Credit Constraints and Margins of Import
  17. Fair Value
  18. The Porter Hypothesis Revisited
  19. Self-determined or non-self-determined? Exploring consumer motivation for sustainable food choices
  20. An Adaptive Lyapunovs Internal PID Regulator in Automotive Applications
  21. Gamification and Governmentality
  22. Counts of all walks as atomic and molecular descriptors.
  23. Efficiency
  24. Classification of playing position in elite junior Australian football using technical skill indicators
  25. Sustainability Reporting as a Consequence of Environmental Orientation
  26. A high power dye laser pumped by a crowbar mode flashlamp
  27. One planet
  28. Temporal variations of perfluoroalkyl substances and polybrominated diphenyl ethers in alpine snow
  29. Sustainability-oriented targets in executive compensation – symbolic measures or significant catalyst for a sustainable transition?
  30. Reality-based tasks for competency-based education
  31. Advancing Decision-Visualization Environments—Empirically informed Design Recommendations
  32. The role of oxytocin in terror management processes
  33. RIGID PRICES AS A RESULT FROM PROFIT MAXIMIZATION