Degrees of Integration: How a Fragmented Entrepreneurial Ecosystem Promotes Different Types of Entrepreneurs

Publikation: Beiträge in ZeitschriftenZeitschriftenaufsätzeForschungbegutachtet

Standard

Degrees of Integration: How a Fragmented Entrepreneurial Ecosystem Promotes Different Types of Entrepreneurs. / Scheidgen, Katharina.
in: Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, Jahrgang 33, Nr. 1-2, 01.01.2021, S. 54-79.

Publikation: Beiträge in ZeitschriftenZeitschriftenaufsätzeForschungbegutachtet

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{e192f3483c674d828829b0b2b0d875c0,
title = "Degrees of Integration: How a Fragmented Entrepreneurial Ecosystem Promotes Different Types of Entrepreneurs",
abstract = "Entrepreneurial Ecosystems (EEs) are expected to support high growth entrepreneurship. Yet, little is known about how they actually promote entrepreneurial activities. Based on Giddens{\textquoteright} structuration theory, this paper takes the entrepreneurs{\textquoteright} perspective to understand how they actually use the resources provided by an EE. Based on semi-structured interviews with entrepreneurs and other relevant actors in the Berlin EE along with participant observation at entrepreneurship events, this case study focuses on the resourcing practices of different types of entrepreneurs. It shows that the Berlin EE comprises two distinct subsystems. On the basis of this evidence it is proposed that EEs can have different degrees of integration and that this characteristic strongly impacts how entrepreneurs can actually acquire resources from the EE and thus how specific EEs promote different types of entrepreneurs. Heterogeneous structures therefore do not only exist between EEs but also within EEs. This heterogeneity needs to be recognized in order to understand how EEs function, enhance the comparability of research results, and design suitable political instruments to promote entrepreneurship effectively.",
keywords = "Management studies, Entrepreneurship, Entrepreneurial ecosystems, resourcing practices, structuration theory, high-growth entrepreneurship, university spin-offs",
author = "Katharina Scheidgen",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2020 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.",
year = "2021",
month = jan,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1080/08985626.2020.1734263",
language = "English",
volume = "33",
pages = "54--79",
journal = "Entrepreneurship and Regional Development",
issn = "0898-5626",
publisher = "Routledge Taylor & Francis Group",
number = "1-2",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Degrees of Integration

T2 - How a Fragmented Entrepreneurial Ecosystem Promotes Different Types of Entrepreneurs

AU - Scheidgen, Katharina

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2020 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.

PY - 2021/1/1

Y1 - 2021/1/1

N2 - Entrepreneurial Ecosystems (EEs) are expected to support high growth entrepreneurship. Yet, little is known about how they actually promote entrepreneurial activities. Based on Giddens’ structuration theory, this paper takes the entrepreneurs’ perspective to understand how they actually use the resources provided by an EE. Based on semi-structured interviews with entrepreneurs and other relevant actors in the Berlin EE along with participant observation at entrepreneurship events, this case study focuses on the resourcing practices of different types of entrepreneurs. It shows that the Berlin EE comprises two distinct subsystems. On the basis of this evidence it is proposed that EEs can have different degrees of integration and that this characteristic strongly impacts how entrepreneurs can actually acquire resources from the EE and thus how specific EEs promote different types of entrepreneurs. Heterogeneous structures therefore do not only exist between EEs but also within EEs. This heterogeneity needs to be recognized in order to understand how EEs function, enhance the comparability of research results, and design suitable political instruments to promote entrepreneurship effectively.

AB - Entrepreneurial Ecosystems (EEs) are expected to support high growth entrepreneurship. Yet, little is known about how they actually promote entrepreneurial activities. Based on Giddens’ structuration theory, this paper takes the entrepreneurs’ perspective to understand how they actually use the resources provided by an EE. Based on semi-structured interviews with entrepreneurs and other relevant actors in the Berlin EE along with participant observation at entrepreneurship events, this case study focuses on the resourcing practices of different types of entrepreneurs. It shows that the Berlin EE comprises two distinct subsystems. On the basis of this evidence it is proposed that EEs can have different degrees of integration and that this characteristic strongly impacts how entrepreneurs can actually acquire resources from the EE and thus how specific EEs promote different types of entrepreneurs. Heterogeneous structures therefore do not only exist between EEs but also within EEs. This heterogeneity needs to be recognized in order to understand how EEs function, enhance the comparability of research results, and design suitable political instruments to promote entrepreneurship effectively.

KW - Management studies

KW - Entrepreneurship

KW - Entrepreneurial ecosystems

KW - resourcing practices

KW - structuration theory

KW - high-growth entrepreneurship

KW - university spin-offs

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85080997097&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/08985626.2020.1734263

DO - 10.1080/08985626.2020.1734263

M3 - Journal articles

VL - 33

SP - 54

EP - 79

JO - Entrepreneurship and Regional Development

JF - Entrepreneurship and Regional Development

SN - 0898-5626

IS - 1-2

ER -

DOI

Zuletzt angesehen

Publikationen

  1. Sustainability learnings from the COVID-19 crisis
  2. Managing depression in older age
  3. Case Study
  4. Punitive Damages
  5. Primed Goals and Primed Actions
  6. Discrimination at work: Effects on Job Satisfaction and Organizational Commitment. An empirical study of the influence of perceived discrimination on work-related behaviours among people with and without a migration background
  7. Leverage points for improving gender equality and human well-being in a smallholder farming context
  8. Georeferencing System for Maneuvering of Autonomous Truck in Mining Environment
  9. From Pity to Control
  10. Combining mechanics and electrostatics
  11. Studien zu einer Ethik der Enttäuschung
  12. Self-determined or non-self-determined? Exploring consumer motivation for sustainable food choices
  13. EEZ-adjacent distant-water fishing as a global security challenge
  14. Innovation bazaar
  15. Counts of all walks as atomic and molecular descriptors.
  16. Sustainability Reporting as a Consequence of Environmental Orientation
  17. A high power dye laser pumped by a crowbar mode flashlamp
  18. Independent Music and Digital Technology in the Philippines
  19. Personalisation as currency
  20. Modernization
  21. Advancing Decision-Visualization Environments—Empirically informed Design Recommendations
  22. Control and Freedom: Power and Paranoia in the Age of Fiber Optics
  23. Design of a Real Time Path of Motion Control for Manufacturing Applications
  24. Integrated assessment of bioelectricity technology options
  25. Processes for green and sustainable software engineering
  26. Effect of laser peening process parameters and sequences on residual stress profiles
  27. Pitfalls in the Study of Democratization
  28. Transformations of pesticides in the atmosphere
  29. Microstructural pattern formation in finite-deformation single-slip crystal plasticity under cyclic loading
  30. SHEstainability
  31. Virtualität und Interaktivität