Consumers' perceptions of biocidal products in households

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Authors

Biocidal products are commonly used in households and can pose a risk to human health and the environment. The aim of this study was to evaluate consumers’ use and understanding of biocidal products in order to identify starting points for minimising their exposure to these products and reducing possible emissions to the environment. In a case study, standardised questionnaires were used to interview consumers in 133 households in three neighbourhoods in Northern Germany, representing the urban–rural typologies in Europe: predominantly urban, intermediate and predominantly rural regions. The questions focussed on the comprehension of the term ‘biocide’, pest control habits, sources of information, risk perception of different product groups and possible emission reduction measures.

Only 21% of the respondents understood the term ‘biocide’ correctly, whereas 29% thought of ‘something that had to do with organic pest control’, and 28% were not able to think of a possible meaning. The risk perception of biocidal products compared to plant protection products varied depending on the living conditions. In the urban neighbourhood, biocidal products were perceived as more dangerous than in the rural area. The main pests to be fought were ants, mould and fruit fly. The results of the study indicate that there is a considerable difference between the types of biocidal products that interviewees claimed to own and those that they actually did have in their households. Most notably, respondents did not realise that they owned surface disinfectants. This result indicates that consumers often seem not to be aware of using specific biocidal products. Also, this shows the limitations of collecting data on products owned with only one method, as the results from products inventories of the households deviate from the data collected in interviews.

Our results show that the term ‘biocide’ is not fully understood by many people. To communicate possible risks of biocidal products, other terms would have to be used. Online information regarding general facts on necessary general hygiene measures and biocidal products against bacteria and insects are likely to be of highest relevance for consumers. However, risk communication for biocidal products in general is difficult because consumers are often not aware of using biocidal products. For this reason, information and awareness raising campaigns should be accompanied by further measures such as sales restrictions for specific user-groups or prohibitions of certain uses for a sustainable use of biocidal products.
Original languageEnglish
JournalInternational Journal of Hygiene and Environmental Health
Volume221
Issue number2
Pages (from-to)260-268
Number of pages9
ISSN1438-4639
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 03.2018

Recently viewed

Publications

  1. The concept of joint production and ecological economics
  2. International Sustainability Standards and Certification
  3. Vorausschauend Kriterien Nachhaltiger Chemie integrieren:
  4. Russland: Energieeffizienz und Klimaschutz kommen zu kurz
  5. Computer Support for Environmental Management Accounting
  6. Teacher Learning and Technology-Enhanced Teacher Education
  7. What drives the development of community energy in Europe?
  8. Soziale Ungleichheit, psychische Gesundheit und Versorgung
  9. Basic analysis of the incremental profile forming process
  10. Spektakuläre Experimente oder das Spiel mit Leben und Tod
  11. A New Approach to Online Reputation Management in Tourism
  12. ‘Void’ democrats? The populist notion of ‘democracy’ in action
  13. Unpacking the Personal Initiative-Performance Relationship
  14. Buchbesprechung: Steffen B. Dagger, Energiepolitik & Lobbying
  15. Learning for sustainable development in regional networks
  16. Das räumliche Vorstellungsvermögen von Grundschulkindern
  17. Sustainability as a Driver for Corporate Economic Success
  18. Sustainability as a Driver for Corporate Economic Success
  19. What we mean when we talk about freedom – The KOMFOR study
  20. Foreign Ownership and Firm Performance in German Services:
  21. Saproxylic beetle assemblages in the Mediterranean region
  22. Integrating adaptation and mitigation to climatic changes
  23. Shooter biases and stereotypes among police and civilians
  24. Deskriptive Statistik in der qualitativen Sozialforschung
  25. A Social Network Perspective on International Assignments:
  26. Beurteilereffekte bei der Messung von Unterrichtsqualität
  27. The Discipline of Environmental Management Accounting (EMA)