Consumers' perceptions of biocidal products in households

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Authors

Biocidal products are commonly used in households and can pose a risk to human health and the environment. The aim of this study was to evaluate consumers’ use and understanding of biocidal products in order to identify starting points for minimising their exposure to these products and reducing possible emissions to the environment. In a case study, standardised questionnaires were used to interview consumers in 133 households in three neighbourhoods in Northern Germany, representing the urban–rural typologies in Europe: predominantly urban, intermediate and predominantly rural regions. The questions focussed on the comprehension of the term ‘biocide’, pest control habits, sources of information, risk perception of different product groups and possible emission reduction measures.

Only 21% of the respondents understood the term ‘biocide’ correctly, whereas 29% thought of ‘something that had to do with organic pest control’, and 28% were not able to think of a possible meaning. The risk perception of biocidal products compared to plant protection products varied depending on the living conditions. In the urban neighbourhood, biocidal products were perceived as more dangerous than in the rural area. The main pests to be fought were ants, mould and fruit fly. The results of the study indicate that there is a considerable difference between the types of biocidal products that interviewees claimed to own and those that they actually did have in their households. Most notably, respondents did not realise that they owned surface disinfectants. This result indicates that consumers often seem not to be aware of using specific biocidal products. Also, this shows the limitations of collecting data on products owned with only one method, as the results from products inventories of the households deviate from the data collected in interviews.

Our results show that the term ‘biocide’ is not fully understood by many people. To communicate possible risks of biocidal products, other terms would have to be used. Online information regarding general facts on necessary general hygiene measures and biocidal products against bacteria and insects are likely to be of highest relevance for consumers. However, risk communication for biocidal products in general is difficult because consumers are often not aware of using biocidal products. For this reason, information and awareness raising campaigns should be accompanied by further measures such as sales restrictions for specific user-groups or prohibitions of certain uses for a sustainable use of biocidal products.
Original languageEnglish
JournalInternational Journal of Hygiene and Environmental Health
Volume221
Issue number2
Pages (from-to)260-268
Number of pages9
ISSN1438-4639
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 03.2018

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2017 Elsevier GmbH

Recently viewed

Publications

  1. Market Power and Concentration Developments
  2. Testing Cort-Fitness and Cort-Adaptation hypotheses in a habitat suitability gradient for roe deer
  3. Exploring inclusive education in times of COVID-19
  4. Whatever we negotiate is not what I like
  5. Positiv, Positivität
  6. Discussion Report: The Proposal for a Directive on the Single-Member Private Limited Liability Company
  7. Virtual Migration, Racism, and the Multiplication of Labour
  8. Deep Rolling for Tailoring Residual Stresses of AA2024 Sheet Metals
  9. Migration und Flucht
  10. Revisiting the richness of integrated vehicle and crew scheduling
  11. Effect of TiBor on the grain refinement and hot tearing susceptibility of AZ91D magnesium alloy
  12. Careless product use in access-based services
  13. A three-armed randomised controlled trial investigating the comparative impact of guidance on the efficacy of a web-based stress management intervention and health impairing and promoting mechanisms of prevention
  14. Leveling up? An inter-neighborhood experiment on parochialism and the efficiency of multi-level public goods provision
  15. Multiple plant diversity components drive consumer communities across ecosystems
  16. Migration
  17. The impact of mindfulness on well-being and performance in the workplace
  18. Fertilized graminoids intensify negative drought effects on grassland productivity
  19. Die Todesmärsche von Buchenwald
  20. Affect, Attachment, and Passion
  21. Three principles for co-designing sustainability intervention strategies: Experiences from Southern Transylvania
  22. National ecosystem restoration pledges are mismatched with social-ecological enabling conditions
  23. The effects of visual sustainability labels on consumer perception and behavior
  24. Participatory scenario planning in place-based social-ecological research