How, when and why do negotiators use reference points? A qualitative interview study with negotiation practitioners

Publikation: Beiträge in ZeitschriftenZeitschriftenaufsätzeForschungbegutachtet

Standard

How, when and why do negotiators use reference points? A qualitative interview study with negotiation practitioners. / Mann, Michel; Trötschel, Roman; Warsitzka, Marco et al.
in: International Journal of Conflict Management, Jahrgang 36, Nr. 3, 28.04.2025, S. 481-513.

Publikation: Beiträge in ZeitschriftenZeitschriftenaufsätzeForschungbegutachtet

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{b7539cbd26d446b0acf5d0bd83955353,
title = "How, when and why do negotiators use reference points?: A qualitative interview study with negotiation practitioners",
abstract = "PurposeHuman decision-making is strongly influenced by the reference points (RPs) people choose. Despite their relevance and ubiquity in negotiations, RPs have received little attention on a conceptual level. To broaden the conceptual knowledge on RPs in negotiations, this paper aims to conduct a qualitative study with experienced negotiation practitioners.Design/methodology/approachTo identify relevant RPs in negotiations, 58 key informants from various negotiation contexts (i.e. business negotiations, labor–union negotiations and political negotiations) were interviewed. Based on 609 items (i.e. specifications of RPs) from 61 reported negotiation cases, this paper provides a comprehensive typology of RPs in negotiations.FindingsThis paper finds four deviations from and extensions of the literature: first, negotiators apply a (much) greater variety of RPs than is represented in research. Second, this paper identifies four different origins of RPs (i.e. the negotiators themselves, the negotiators{\textquoteright} organizations, the parties{\textquoteright} collaboration and the environment). Third, RPs are more dynamic than previously assumed in empirical research, because negotiators frequently change their RP in negotiations. And fourth, this paper extends the knowledge about the psychological functions of RPs in negotiations: The informants in this study used RPs not only to evaluate their own performance, but also to justify outcomes within their organizations and monitor the implementation of agreements.Originality/valueThe insights of this inductive study suggest a change in the current understanding of RPs in research, as RPs prove to be a multifaceted and dynamic construct that fulfills various psychological functions. With the current research, this paper aims to narrow a critical theoretical gap by broadening the conceptual understanding of RPs, a central element of various theoretical approaches in negotiation research. Thereby, this paper also contributes to further specifying a general theory of negotiation.",
keywords = "Psychology, typology, negotiation, interview study, psychological funtions, reference points",
author = "Michel Mann and Roman Tr{\"o}tschel and Marco Warsitzka and Joachim H{\"u}ffmeier",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2025, Michel Mann, Marco Warsitzka, Roman Tr{\"o}tschel and Joachim H{\"u}ffmeier.",
year = "2025",
month = apr,
day = "28",
doi = "10.1108/ijcma-02-2024-0036",
language = "English",
volume = "36",
pages = "481--513",
journal = "International Journal of Conflict Management",
issn = "1044-4068",
publisher = "Emerald Publishing Limited",
number = "3",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - How, when and why do negotiators use reference points?

T2 - A qualitative interview study with negotiation practitioners

AU - Mann, Michel

AU - Trötschel, Roman

AU - Warsitzka, Marco

AU - Hüffmeier, Joachim

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2025, Michel Mann, Marco Warsitzka, Roman Trötschel and Joachim Hüffmeier.

PY - 2025/4/28

Y1 - 2025/4/28

N2 - PurposeHuman decision-making is strongly influenced by the reference points (RPs) people choose. Despite their relevance and ubiquity in negotiations, RPs have received little attention on a conceptual level. To broaden the conceptual knowledge on RPs in negotiations, this paper aims to conduct a qualitative study with experienced negotiation practitioners.Design/methodology/approachTo identify relevant RPs in negotiations, 58 key informants from various negotiation contexts (i.e. business negotiations, labor–union negotiations and political negotiations) were interviewed. Based on 609 items (i.e. specifications of RPs) from 61 reported negotiation cases, this paper provides a comprehensive typology of RPs in negotiations.FindingsThis paper finds four deviations from and extensions of the literature: first, negotiators apply a (much) greater variety of RPs than is represented in research. Second, this paper identifies four different origins of RPs (i.e. the negotiators themselves, the negotiators’ organizations, the parties’ collaboration and the environment). Third, RPs are more dynamic than previously assumed in empirical research, because negotiators frequently change their RP in negotiations. And fourth, this paper extends the knowledge about the psychological functions of RPs in negotiations: The informants in this study used RPs not only to evaluate their own performance, but also to justify outcomes within their organizations and monitor the implementation of agreements.Originality/valueThe insights of this inductive study suggest a change in the current understanding of RPs in research, as RPs prove to be a multifaceted and dynamic construct that fulfills various psychological functions. With the current research, this paper aims to narrow a critical theoretical gap by broadening the conceptual understanding of RPs, a central element of various theoretical approaches in negotiation research. Thereby, this paper also contributes to further specifying a general theory of negotiation.

AB - PurposeHuman decision-making is strongly influenced by the reference points (RPs) people choose. Despite their relevance and ubiquity in negotiations, RPs have received little attention on a conceptual level. To broaden the conceptual knowledge on RPs in negotiations, this paper aims to conduct a qualitative study with experienced negotiation practitioners.Design/methodology/approachTo identify relevant RPs in negotiations, 58 key informants from various negotiation contexts (i.e. business negotiations, labor–union negotiations and political negotiations) were interviewed. Based on 609 items (i.e. specifications of RPs) from 61 reported negotiation cases, this paper provides a comprehensive typology of RPs in negotiations.FindingsThis paper finds four deviations from and extensions of the literature: first, negotiators apply a (much) greater variety of RPs than is represented in research. Second, this paper identifies four different origins of RPs (i.e. the negotiators themselves, the negotiators’ organizations, the parties’ collaboration and the environment). Third, RPs are more dynamic than previously assumed in empirical research, because negotiators frequently change their RP in negotiations. And fourth, this paper extends the knowledge about the psychological functions of RPs in negotiations: The informants in this study used RPs not only to evaluate their own performance, but also to justify outcomes within their organizations and monitor the implementation of agreements.Originality/valueThe insights of this inductive study suggest a change in the current understanding of RPs in research, as RPs prove to be a multifaceted and dynamic construct that fulfills various psychological functions. With the current research, this paper aims to narrow a critical theoretical gap by broadening the conceptual understanding of RPs, a central element of various theoretical approaches in negotiation research. Thereby, this paper also contributes to further specifying a general theory of negotiation.

KW - Psychology

KW - typology

KW - negotiation

KW - interview study

KW - psychological funtions

KW - reference points

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=105007978524&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1108/ijcma-02-2024-0036

DO - 10.1108/ijcma-02-2024-0036

M3 - Journal articles

VL - 36

SP - 481

EP - 513

JO - International Journal of Conflict Management

JF - International Journal of Conflict Management

SN - 1044-4068

IS - 3

ER -

DOI

Zuletzt angesehen

Forschende

  1. Kerstin Fedder

Publikationen

  1. A Developmental Trend in the Structure of Time-Estimation Performance
  2. How to attract visitors with strategic, value-based experience design
  3. Clashing Values
  4. Monitoring of microbially mediated corrosion and scaling processes using redox potential measurements
  5. Visual Detection of Traffic Incident through Automatic Monitoring of Vehicle Activities
  6. Geodesign as a boundary management process
  7. Employing a Novel Metaheuristic Algorithm to Optimize an LSTM Model
  8. A Graphic Language for Business Application Systems to Improve Communication Concerning Requirements Specification with the User
  9. Spatio-Temporal Convolution Kernels
  10. Archives
  11. Trap nests for bees and wasps to analyse trophic interactions in changing environments—A systematic overview and user guide
  12. Digital Seriality as Structure and Process
  13. Evaluating a Bayesian Student Model of Decimal Misconceptions
  14. Contextualizing certification and auditing
  15. On Software, or the Persistence of Visual Knowledge.
  16. Online-scheduling using past and real-time data
  17. Leverage points 2019
  18. Semiparametric one-step estimation of a sample selection model with endogenous covariates
  19. Enhancing EFL classroom instruction via the FeedBook: effects on language development and communicative language use.
  20. Nonlinear anisotropic boundary value problems – regularity results and multiscale discretizations
  21. More than a YouTube Channel
  22. How generative drawing affects the learning process
  23. Practical Formalist
  24. Micro and Macro Perspectives in Organization Theory
  25. Towards a Comprehensive Framework for Environmental Management Accounting
  26. Lifeworld and System