Establishing an infrastructure for collaboration in primate cognition research

Publikation: Beiträge in ZeitschriftenZeitschriftenaufsätzeForschungbegutachtet

Authors

  • Drew M. Altschul
  • Michael J. Beran
  • Josep Call
  • Sarah DeTroy
  • Shona J. Duguid
  • Crystal L. Egelkamp
  • Claudia Fichtel
  • Julia Fischer
  • Molly Flessert
  • Daniel Hanus
  • Daniel B.M. Haun
  • Lou M. Haux
  • R. Adriana Hernandez-Aguilar
  • Esther Herrmann
  • Lydia M. Hopper
  • Marine Joly
  • Fumihiro Kano
  • Stefanie Keupp
  • Alicia P. Melis
  • Alba Motes Rodrigo
  • Stephen R. Ross
  • Alejandro Sánchez-Amaro
  • Yutaro Sato
  • Vanessa Schmitt
  • Manon K. Schweinfurth
  • Amanda M. Seed
  • Derry Taylor
  • Christoph J. Völter
  • Elizabeth Warren
  • Julia Watzek

Inferring the evolutionary history of cognitive abilities requires large and diverse samples. However, such samples are often beyond the reach of individual researchers or institutions, and studies are often limited to small numbers of species. Consequently, methodological and site-specific-differences across studies can limit comparisons between species. Here we introduce the ManyPrimates project, which addresses these challenges by providing a large-scale collaborative framework for comparative studies in primate cognition. To demonstrate the viability of the project we conducted a case study of short-term memory. In this initial study, we were able to include 176 individuals from 12 primate species housed at 11 sites across Africa, Asia, North America and Europe. All subjects were tested in a delayed-response task using consistent methodology across sites. Individuals could access food rewards by remembering the position of the hidden reward after a 0, 15, or 30-second delay. Overall, individuals performed better with shorter delays, as predicted by previous studies. Phylogenetic analysis revealed a strong phylogenetic signal for short-term memory. Although, with only 12 species, the validity of this analysis is limited, our initial results demonstrate the feasibility of a large, collaborative open-science project. We present the ManyPrimates project as an exciting opportunity to address open questions in primate cognition and behaviour with large, diverse datasets.

OriginalspracheEnglisch
Aufsatznummere0223675
ZeitschriftPLoS ONE
Jahrgang14
Ausgabenummer10
Anzahl der Seiten19
ISSN1932-6203
DOIs
PublikationsstatusErschienen - 24.10.2019
Extern publiziertJa

Bibliographische Notiz

Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 Altschul et al.

DOI

Zuletzt angesehen

Publikationen

  1. Gender Differences in Grip-Strength Depending on Arousal and Valence of Emotions
  2. Raising economic performance by fostering product market competition in Germany
  3. Towards a relational paradigm in sustainability research, practice, and education
  4. Im musikalischen Stadtteil der Sprache Zu Katrin Eggers' Wittgenstein-Monographie
  5. Substance Flows Associated with Medical Care - Significance of Different Sources
  6. Statistical implications of utility weighted and equally weighted HRQL measures
  7. Versuch zu Formen von Öffentlichkeit in lokalen Bildungs- und Sorgelandschaften
  8. Connected Text Reading and Differences in Text Reading Fluency in Adult Readers
  9. The sensitivity of lizards to elevation: A case study from south-eastern Australia
  10. Cycling anger of regular cyclists and professional bicycle messengers in Germany
  11. Zwei Streitschriften über Produktion und Legitimation ökonomischer Ungleichheit
  12. Rechtliche Rahmenbedingungen des Verhältnisses von Eltern, Schule und Jugendhilfe
  13. Exports, Foreign Direct Investments and Productivity: Are Services Firms different?
  14. Brown bear activity in traditional wood-pastures in Southern Transylvania, Romania
  15. Vertrag über die Europäische Union (EUV) : Artikel 19 [Internationale Organisationen]
  16. Lernen und Wiederlernen in chatbasiertem Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning
  17. Scale in environmental governance: moving from concepts and cases to consolidation
  18. The effects of psychotherapy for adult depression on suicidality and hopelessness
  19. Benutzbarkeit von Software: Vor- und Nachteile verschiedener Methoden und Verfahren