Does thinking-aloud affect learning, visual information processing and cognitive load when learning with seductive details as expected from self-regulation perspective?

Publikation: Beiträge in ZeitschriftenZeitschriftenaufsätzeForschungbegutachtet

Standard

Does thinking-aloud affect learning, visual information processing and cognitive load when learning with seductive details as expected from self-regulation perspective? / Park, Babette; Korbach, Andreas; Brünken, Roland.
in: Computers in Human Behavior, Jahrgang 111, 106411, 10.2020.

Publikation: Beiträge in ZeitschriftenZeitschriftenaufsätzeForschungbegutachtet

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{cb2144a2dcdd4757a905252eba47fe17,
title = "Does thinking-aloud affect learning, visual information processing and cognitive load when learning with seductive details as expected from self-regulation perspective?",
abstract = "The present study is a validation study asking the question if the method of using thinking-aloud protocols (TAPs) for investigating learning effects is appropriate, as the process of thinking aloud could play a crucial role in cognitive processing by prompting self-regulative processes and could therefore interfere with learning. The present work uses the negative learning effect of seductive details to investigate this research question and is thereby also offering a new perspective from research on self-regulation on the discussion of the seductive details effect. 120 university students learned with a digital learning program that was varied by the two factors thinking-aloud (with vs. without) and seductive details (with vs. without) in the 2x2 factorial design study. Results show that TAPs affect visual information processing measured by eye movement, subjectively perceived cognitive load, and retention performance, but not comprehension or transfer performance. Moreover, the seductive details effect is confirmed to be stable also under the TAPs condition, as no interaction effects were found. These findings have several interesting theoretical and practical implications that are discussed from three viewpoints, the methodological, the research on seductive details and the self-regulation perspective.",
keywords = "Cognitive load, Eye-tracking, Multimedia learning, Seductive details, Self-regulation, Thinking aloud, Educational science",
author = "Babette Park and Andreas Korbach and Roland Br{\"u}nken",
year = "2020",
month = oct,
doi = "10.1016/j.chb.2020.106411",
language = "English",
volume = "111",
journal = "Computers in Human Behavior",
issn = "0747-5632",
publisher = "Elsevier Ltd",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Does thinking-aloud affect learning, visual information processing and cognitive load when learning with seductive details as expected from self-regulation perspective?

AU - Park, Babette

AU - Korbach, Andreas

AU - Brünken, Roland

PY - 2020/10

Y1 - 2020/10

N2 - The present study is a validation study asking the question if the method of using thinking-aloud protocols (TAPs) for investigating learning effects is appropriate, as the process of thinking aloud could play a crucial role in cognitive processing by prompting self-regulative processes and could therefore interfere with learning. The present work uses the negative learning effect of seductive details to investigate this research question and is thereby also offering a new perspective from research on self-regulation on the discussion of the seductive details effect. 120 university students learned with a digital learning program that was varied by the two factors thinking-aloud (with vs. without) and seductive details (with vs. without) in the 2x2 factorial design study. Results show that TAPs affect visual information processing measured by eye movement, subjectively perceived cognitive load, and retention performance, but not comprehension or transfer performance. Moreover, the seductive details effect is confirmed to be stable also under the TAPs condition, as no interaction effects were found. These findings have several interesting theoretical and practical implications that are discussed from three viewpoints, the methodological, the research on seductive details and the self-regulation perspective.

AB - The present study is a validation study asking the question if the method of using thinking-aloud protocols (TAPs) for investigating learning effects is appropriate, as the process of thinking aloud could play a crucial role in cognitive processing by prompting self-regulative processes and could therefore interfere with learning. The present work uses the negative learning effect of seductive details to investigate this research question and is thereby also offering a new perspective from research on self-regulation on the discussion of the seductive details effect. 120 university students learned with a digital learning program that was varied by the two factors thinking-aloud (with vs. without) and seductive details (with vs. without) in the 2x2 factorial design study. Results show that TAPs affect visual information processing measured by eye movement, subjectively perceived cognitive load, and retention performance, but not comprehension or transfer performance. Moreover, the seductive details effect is confirmed to be stable also under the TAPs condition, as no interaction effects were found. These findings have several interesting theoretical and practical implications that are discussed from three viewpoints, the methodological, the research on seductive details and the self-regulation perspective.

KW - Cognitive load

KW - Eye-tracking

KW - Multimedia learning

KW - Seductive details

KW - Self-regulation

KW - Thinking aloud

KW - Educational science

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85084950861&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.chb.2020.106411

DO - 10.1016/j.chb.2020.106411

M3 - Journal articles

AN - SCOPUS:85084950861

VL - 111

JO - Computers in Human Behavior

JF - Computers in Human Behavior

SN - 0747-5632

M1 - 106411

ER -

DOI

Zuletzt angesehen

Aktivitäten

  1. On Borders, Boundaries, Clouds, and Globalization. And on China.
  2. ‘Thinking the Problematic‘
  3. Digitalization and Organizational Learning: Use the Double-Loop
  4. Academy of Management Annual Meeting 2023
  5. Harvard Universität
  6. Mathematical and Computational Applications (Fachzeitschrift)
  7. Project Workshop on "Worker Flows, Match Quality, and Productivity" - 2019
  8. Curating Diversity in Global Performance Art
  9. Evaluation of tension-compression asymmetry in nanocrystalline PdAu using a Drucker-Prager type constitutive model.
  10. Symposium "Art and its Frames - Continuity and Change" 2014
  11. Comfort and Intervention Behavior of Drivers in Highly Automated Vehicles with Headway Control
  12. International Conference of EAS and ISME - 2007
  13. Migrations of Knowledge - Migknow 2014
  14. The Predictive Power of Social Media Sentiment for Short-Term Stock Movements
  15. Co-creating transformative processes - a designerly approach
  16. Education for Sustainable Development – Experiences from Theory and Practice
  17. Requests in Nigerian and British English conversational interactions: A corpus-based approach.
  18. Research Workshop “Innovation & Value Creation"
  19. 3rd International Conference on Innovations in Bio-Inspired Computing and Applications: Program Committee Member - IBICA2012
  20. Prototypes: The Usefulf Ambiguity of the „Biological Computer" (Annual Meeting of the AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR CYBERNETICS)
  21. Video or Text Cases in Problem-Oriented or Direct Instructional Settings for Preservice Teachers?
  22. Agile Portfolio Management Patterns - A Research Design
  23. Co-creating transformative processes - a designerly approach
  24. HOW SUSTAINABILITY ACCOUNTING CONTRIBUTES TO IMPROVED INFORMATION MANAGEMENT AND MANAGEMENT CONTROL
  25. Artificial Intelligence in Criminal Law
  26. 5th Int. Summer Academy „Energy and the Environment“ 2008