Does thinking-aloud affect learning, visual information processing and cognitive load when learning with seductive details as expected from self-regulation perspective?

Publikation: Beiträge in ZeitschriftenZeitschriftenaufsätzeForschungbegutachtet

Standard

Does thinking-aloud affect learning, visual information processing and cognitive load when learning with seductive details as expected from self-regulation perspective? / Park, Babette; Korbach, Andreas; Brünken, Roland.
in: Computers in Human Behavior, Jahrgang 111, 106411, 10.2020.

Publikation: Beiträge in ZeitschriftenZeitschriftenaufsätzeForschungbegutachtet

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{cb2144a2dcdd4757a905252eba47fe17,
title = "Does thinking-aloud affect learning, visual information processing and cognitive load when learning with seductive details as expected from self-regulation perspective?",
abstract = "The present study is a validation study asking the question if the method of using thinking-aloud protocols (TAPs) for investigating learning effects is appropriate, as the process of thinking aloud could play a crucial role in cognitive processing by prompting self-regulative processes and could therefore interfere with learning. The present work uses the negative learning effect of seductive details to investigate this research question and is thereby also offering a new perspective from research on self-regulation on the discussion of the seductive details effect. 120 university students learned with a digital learning program that was varied by the two factors thinking-aloud (with vs. without) and seductive details (with vs. without) in the 2x2 factorial design study. Results show that TAPs affect visual information processing measured by eye movement, subjectively perceived cognitive load, and retention performance, but not comprehension or transfer performance. Moreover, the seductive details effect is confirmed to be stable also under the TAPs condition, as no interaction effects were found. These findings have several interesting theoretical and practical implications that are discussed from three viewpoints, the methodological, the research on seductive details and the self-regulation perspective.",
keywords = "Cognitive load, Eye-tracking, Multimedia learning, Seductive details, Self-regulation, Thinking aloud, Educational science",
author = "Babette Park and Andreas Korbach and Roland Br{\"u}nken",
year = "2020",
month = oct,
doi = "10.1016/j.chb.2020.106411",
language = "English",
volume = "111",
journal = "Computers in Human Behavior",
issn = "0747-5632",
publisher = "Elsevier Ltd",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Does thinking-aloud affect learning, visual information processing and cognitive load when learning with seductive details as expected from self-regulation perspective?

AU - Park, Babette

AU - Korbach, Andreas

AU - Brünken, Roland

PY - 2020/10

Y1 - 2020/10

N2 - The present study is a validation study asking the question if the method of using thinking-aloud protocols (TAPs) for investigating learning effects is appropriate, as the process of thinking aloud could play a crucial role in cognitive processing by prompting self-regulative processes and could therefore interfere with learning. The present work uses the negative learning effect of seductive details to investigate this research question and is thereby also offering a new perspective from research on self-regulation on the discussion of the seductive details effect. 120 university students learned with a digital learning program that was varied by the two factors thinking-aloud (with vs. without) and seductive details (with vs. without) in the 2x2 factorial design study. Results show that TAPs affect visual information processing measured by eye movement, subjectively perceived cognitive load, and retention performance, but not comprehension or transfer performance. Moreover, the seductive details effect is confirmed to be stable also under the TAPs condition, as no interaction effects were found. These findings have several interesting theoretical and practical implications that are discussed from three viewpoints, the methodological, the research on seductive details and the self-regulation perspective.

AB - The present study is a validation study asking the question if the method of using thinking-aloud protocols (TAPs) for investigating learning effects is appropriate, as the process of thinking aloud could play a crucial role in cognitive processing by prompting self-regulative processes and could therefore interfere with learning. The present work uses the negative learning effect of seductive details to investigate this research question and is thereby also offering a new perspective from research on self-regulation on the discussion of the seductive details effect. 120 university students learned with a digital learning program that was varied by the two factors thinking-aloud (with vs. without) and seductive details (with vs. without) in the 2x2 factorial design study. Results show that TAPs affect visual information processing measured by eye movement, subjectively perceived cognitive load, and retention performance, but not comprehension or transfer performance. Moreover, the seductive details effect is confirmed to be stable also under the TAPs condition, as no interaction effects were found. These findings have several interesting theoretical and practical implications that are discussed from three viewpoints, the methodological, the research on seductive details and the self-regulation perspective.

KW - Cognitive load

KW - Eye-tracking

KW - Multimedia learning

KW - Seductive details

KW - Self-regulation

KW - Thinking aloud

KW - Educational science

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85084950861&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.chb.2020.106411

DO - 10.1016/j.chb.2020.106411

M3 - Journal articles

AN - SCOPUS:85084950861

VL - 111

JO - Computers in Human Behavior

JF - Computers in Human Behavior

SN - 0747-5632

M1 - 106411

ER -

DOI

Zuletzt angesehen

Forschende

  1. Kerstin Fedder

Aktivitäten

  1. Cross-Cultural Validation of the LLWI: Example of an English Language Version
  2. Removal of Methotrexate, 5-Fluorouracil and Cyclophosphamide from water by UV, UV/H2O2 and UV/Fe2+/H2O2 processe
  3. Supply Chain Management – Current Practices and Future Developments
  4. The Advance of Diagnosis Chatbots: Should We First Avoid Distrust Before We Focus on Trust?
  5. Is Transaction Cost Theory a useful Perspective for Make-and-Buy?
  6. Just why, how and when should more participation lead to better environmental policy outcomes? A causal framework for analysis
  7. International Flusser Lectures Day - 2010
  8. Methodological Assemblage - Experiences from an Interdisciplinary Project on Artists and Cities
  9. Networks, Transcultural Entanglements, and the Power of Aesthetic Choices: Artistic Encounters in the Medieval Afro-Eurasian World
  10. On Borders, Boundaries, Clouds, and Globalization. And on China.
  11. Extending Working Lives in Organizations: The Later Life Workplace Index for Successful Management of an Aging Workforce
  12. IEEE International Conference on Control Applications - CCA 2012
  13. The more attractive the more effective? Investigating the association of user experience and efficacy of an online and app-based gratitude intervention to reduce repetitive negative thinking
  14. Experiences on the theme of actions for sustainable development in the field of educational systems, together with Ute Stoltenberg
  15. Work well, rest well, be well: How experience-sampling methods help us understand the new world of work
  16. Fostering language development by content based learning in German secondary schools
  17. PEER Workshop, Aalto University, Helsinki

Publikationen

  1. Developing a Process for the Analysis of User Journeys and the Prediction of Dropout in Digital Health Interventions:
  2. Pathways of Data-driven Business Model Design and Realization
  3. Development of Early Spatial Perspective-Taking - Toward a Three-Level Model
  4. Simulation and optimization of material and energy flow systems
  5. Public perceptions of CCS in context
  6. Outperformed by a Computer? - Comparing Human Decisions to Reinforcement Learning Agents, Assigning Lot Sizes in a Learning Factory
  7. An Integrative Framework of Environmental Management Accounting
  8. How to support teachers to give feedback to modelling tasks effectively? Results from a teacher-training-study in the Co²CA project
  9. On New Forms of Science Communication and Communication in Science
  10. German Utilities and Distributed PV
  11. A Developmental Trend in the Structure of Time-Estimation Performance
  12. How to attract visitors with strategic, value-based experience design
  13. Clashing Values
  14. Monitoring of microbially mediated corrosion and scaling processes using redox potential measurements
  15. Visual Detection of Traffic Incident through Automatic Monitoring of Vehicle Activities
  16. Geodesign as a boundary management process
  17. Employing a Novel Metaheuristic Algorithm to Optimize an LSTM Model
  18. A Graphic Language for Business Application Systems to Improve Communication Concerning Requirements Specification with the User
  19. Spatio-Temporal Convolution Kernels
  20. Archives
  21. Trap nests for bees and wasps to analyse trophic interactions in changing environments—A systematic overview and user guide
  22. Digital Seriality as Structure and Process
  23. Evaluating a Bayesian Student Model of Decimal Misconceptions
  24. Contextualizing certification and auditing
  25. On Software, or the Persistence of Visual Knowledge.
  26. Online-scheduling using past and real-time data
  27. Leverage points 2019