Does thinking-aloud affect learning, visual information processing and cognitive load when learning with seductive details as expected from self-regulation perspective?

Publikation: Beiträge in ZeitschriftenZeitschriftenaufsätzeForschungbegutachtet

Standard

Does thinking-aloud affect learning, visual information processing and cognitive load when learning with seductive details as expected from self-regulation perspective? / Park, Babette; Korbach, Andreas; Brünken, Roland.
in: Computers in Human Behavior, Jahrgang 111, 106411, 10.2020.

Publikation: Beiträge in ZeitschriftenZeitschriftenaufsätzeForschungbegutachtet

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{cb2144a2dcdd4757a905252eba47fe17,
title = "Does thinking-aloud affect learning, visual information processing and cognitive load when learning with seductive details as expected from self-regulation perspective?",
abstract = "The present study is a validation study asking the question if the method of using thinking-aloud protocols (TAPs) for investigating learning effects is appropriate, as the process of thinking aloud could play a crucial role in cognitive processing by prompting self-regulative processes and could therefore interfere with learning. The present work uses the negative learning effect of seductive details to investigate this research question and is thereby also offering a new perspective from research on self-regulation on the discussion of the seductive details effect. 120 university students learned with a digital learning program that was varied by the two factors thinking-aloud (with vs. without) and seductive details (with vs. without) in the 2x2 factorial design study. Results show that TAPs affect visual information processing measured by eye movement, subjectively perceived cognitive load, and retention performance, but not comprehension or transfer performance. Moreover, the seductive details effect is confirmed to be stable also under the TAPs condition, as no interaction effects were found. These findings have several interesting theoretical and practical implications that are discussed from three viewpoints, the methodological, the research on seductive details and the self-regulation perspective.",
keywords = "Cognitive load, Eye-tracking, Multimedia learning, Seductive details, Self-regulation, Thinking aloud, Educational science",
author = "Babette Park and Andreas Korbach and Roland Br{\"u}nken",
year = "2020",
month = oct,
doi = "10.1016/j.chb.2020.106411",
language = "English",
volume = "111",
journal = "Computers in Human Behavior",
issn = "0747-5632",
publisher = "Elsevier Ltd",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Does thinking-aloud affect learning, visual information processing and cognitive load when learning with seductive details as expected from self-regulation perspective?

AU - Park, Babette

AU - Korbach, Andreas

AU - Brünken, Roland

PY - 2020/10

Y1 - 2020/10

N2 - The present study is a validation study asking the question if the method of using thinking-aloud protocols (TAPs) for investigating learning effects is appropriate, as the process of thinking aloud could play a crucial role in cognitive processing by prompting self-regulative processes and could therefore interfere with learning. The present work uses the negative learning effect of seductive details to investigate this research question and is thereby also offering a new perspective from research on self-regulation on the discussion of the seductive details effect. 120 university students learned with a digital learning program that was varied by the two factors thinking-aloud (with vs. without) and seductive details (with vs. without) in the 2x2 factorial design study. Results show that TAPs affect visual information processing measured by eye movement, subjectively perceived cognitive load, and retention performance, but not comprehension or transfer performance. Moreover, the seductive details effect is confirmed to be stable also under the TAPs condition, as no interaction effects were found. These findings have several interesting theoretical and practical implications that are discussed from three viewpoints, the methodological, the research on seductive details and the self-regulation perspective.

AB - The present study is a validation study asking the question if the method of using thinking-aloud protocols (TAPs) for investigating learning effects is appropriate, as the process of thinking aloud could play a crucial role in cognitive processing by prompting self-regulative processes and could therefore interfere with learning. The present work uses the negative learning effect of seductive details to investigate this research question and is thereby also offering a new perspective from research on self-regulation on the discussion of the seductive details effect. 120 university students learned with a digital learning program that was varied by the two factors thinking-aloud (with vs. without) and seductive details (with vs. without) in the 2x2 factorial design study. Results show that TAPs affect visual information processing measured by eye movement, subjectively perceived cognitive load, and retention performance, but not comprehension or transfer performance. Moreover, the seductive details effect is confirmed to be stable also under the TAPs condition, as no interaction effects were found. These findings have several interesting theoretical and practical implications that are discussed from three viewpoints, the methodological, the research on seductive details and the self-regulation perspective.

KW - Cognitive load

KW - Eye-tracking

KW - Multimedia learning

KW - Seductive details

KW - Self-regulation

KW - Thinking aloud

KW - Educational science

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85084950861&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.chb.2020.106411

DO - 10.1016/j.chb.2020.106411

M3 - Journal articles

AN - SCOPUS:85084950861

VL - 111

JO - Computers in Human Behavior

JF - Computers in Human Behavior

SN - 0747-5632

M1 - 106411

ER -

DOI

Zuletzt angesehen

Aktivitäten

  1. Plenary Speaker at the 2022 5th IEEE International Conference on Information Communication and Signal Processing (ICICSP 2022). Plenary entitled "Soft Optimal Computing Techniques to Identify and Control Surface Roughness in Manufacturing".
  2. Performing ventures in, trough and with regional start-up ecosystems: Emering insights on slowness in accelerators and the pedagogy of pitching
  3. Evaluating the efficacy and cost-effectiveness of web-based prevention of major depression: Preliminary results.
  4. Thinking of Time - A Resource which Should be Allocated Equally
  5. Concurrent Reconceptualization of Concurrent Sourcing
  6. Small Formation: Lines and Alternating Knots as Logistic Inversions
  7. The paths and parts one picture paints: Tracing a visual’s multimodal and relational boundary work in an interorganizational team
  8. Gutachter (external rewiever; final evaluation report) der European Science
 Foundation COST Action 287 "Gesture Controlled Audio Interfaces"
  9. Common Ground #2. On Spaces and the In Between
  10. Changing learning environments at university? Comparing the learning strategies of non-traditional European students engaged in lifelong learning.
  11. 23rd (EC)2 Conference - Hypothesis Testing - EC2 2012
  12. Methodological Assemblage - Experiences from an Interdisciplinary Project on Artists and Cities
  13. Networks, Transcultural Entanglements, and the Power of Aesthetic Choices: Artistic Encounters in the Medieval Afro-Eurasian World
  14. Implementing Sustainability Strategies Through Accounting Controls: An Exploration of Practices in Seven Multinational Corporations
  15. Panel Cointegration Testing with Time Trend and Analysis of Money Demand in OECD Countries
  16. Professional School (Organisation)
  17. Contagious Agents: From Generative Social Science to the Computer Simulation of Epidemics
  18. Responding ASAP? The Role of Age in Dealing with Availability and Response Expectations