Does thinking-aloud affect learning, visual information processing and cognitive load when learning with seductive details as expected from self-regulation perspective?

Publikation: Beiträge in ZeitschriftenZeitschriftenaufsätzeForschungbegutachtet

Standard

Does thinking-aloud affect learning, visual information processing and cognitive load when learning with seductive details as expected from self-regulation perspective? / Park, Babette; Korbach, Andreas; Brünken, Roland.
in: Computers in Human Behavior, Jahrgang 111, 106411, 10.2020.

Publikation: Beiträge in ZeitschriftenZeitschriftenaufsätzeForschungbegutachtet

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{cb2144a2dcdd4757a905252eba47fe17,
title = "Does thinking-aloud affect learning, visual information processing and cognitive load when learning with seductive details as expected from self-regulation perspective?",
abstract = "The present study is a validation study asking the question if the method of using thinking-aloud protocols (TAPs) for investigating learning effects is appropriate, as the process of thinking aloud could play a crucial role in cognitive processing by prompting self-regulative processes and could therefore interfere with learning. The present work uses the negative learning effect of seductive details to investigate this research question and is thereby also offering a new perspective from research on self-regulation on the discussion of the seductive details effect. 120 university students learned with a digital learning program that was varied by the two factors thinking-aloud (with vs. without) and seductive details (with vs. without) in the 2x2 factorial design study. Results show that TAPs affect visual information processing measured by eye movement, subjectively perceived cognitive load, and retention performance, but not comprehension or transfer performance. Moreover, the seductive details effect is confirmed to be stable also under the TAPs condition, as no interaction effects were found. These findings have several interesting theoretical and practical implications that are discussed from three viewpoints, the methodological, the research on seductive details and the self-regulation perspective.",
keywords = "Cognitive load, Eye-tracking, Multimedia learning, Seductive details, Self-regulation, Thinking aloud, Educational science",
author = "Babette Park and Andreas Korbach and Roland Br{\"u}nken",
year = "2020",
month = oct,
doi = "10.1016/j.chb.2020.106411",
language = "English",
volume = "111",
journal = "Computers in Human Behavior",
issn = "0747-5632",
publisher = "Elsevier Ltd",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Does thinking-aloud affect learning, visual information processing and cognitive load when learning with seductive details as expected from self-regulation perspective?

AU - Park, Babette

AU - Korbach, Andreas

AU - Brünken, Roland

PY - 2020/10

Y1 - 2020/10

N2 - The present study is a validation study asking the question if the method of using thinking-aloud protocols (TAPs) for investigating learning effects is appropriate, as the process of thinking aloud could play a crucial role in cognitive processing by prompting self-regulative processes and could therefore interfere with learning. The present work uses the negative learning effect of seductive details to investigate this research question and is thereby also offering a new perspective from research on self-regulation on the discussion of the seductive details effect. 120 university students learned with a digital learning program that was varied by the two factors thinking-aloud (with vs. without) and seductive details (with vs. without) in the 2x2 factorial design study. Results show that TAPs affect visual information processing measured by eye movement, subjectively perceived cognitive load, and retention performance, but not comprehension or transfer performance. Moreover, the seductive details effect is confirmed to be stable also under the TAPs condition, as no interaction effects were found. These findings have several interesting theoretical and practical implications that are discussed from three viewpoints, the methodological, the research on seductive details and the self-regulation perspective.

AB - The present study is a validation study asking the question if the method of using thinking-aloud protocols (TAPs) for investigating learning effects is appropriate, as the process of thinking aloud could play a crucial role in cognitive processing by prompting self-regulative processes and could therefore interfere with learning. The present work uses the negative learning effect of seductive details to investigate this research question and is thereby also offering a new perspective from research on self-regulation on the discussion of the seductive details effect. 120 university students learned with a digital learning program that was varied by the two factors thinking-aloud (with vs. without) and seductive details (with vs. without) in the 2x2 factorial design study. Results show that TAPs affect visual information processing measured by eye movement, subjectively perceived cognitive load, and retention performance, but not comprehension or transfer performance. Moreover, the seductive details effect is confirmed to be stable also under the TAPs condition, as no interaction effects were found. These findings have several interesting theoretical and practical implications that are discussed from three viewpoints, the methodological, the research on seductive details and the self-regulation perspective.

KW - Cognitive load

KW - Eye-tracking

KW - Multimedia learning

KW - Seductive details

KW - Self-regulation

KW - Thinking aloud

KW - Educational science

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85084950861&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.chb.2020.106411

DO - 10.1016/j.chb.2020.106411

M3 - Journal articles

AN - SCOPUS:85084950861

VL - 111

JO - Computers in Human Behavior

JF - Computers in Human Behavior

SN - 0747-5632

M1 - 106411

ER -

DOI

Zuletzt angesehen

Aktivitäten

  1. Learners managing the ambiguity of sustainable development – An empirical exploration of the learning method "Systemic Visualisation"
  2. 9th International Workshop on Set-Oriented Numerics 2022
  3. Grenzflächen der Informatik - 2006
  4. International Conference on E-Health Networking, Application and Services 2017
  5. Fachtagung Sucht 2020
  6. Preliminary results of the state of the art study on microbiological processes.
  7. Educational online Materials and Methods 2002.
  8. Workshop: "Transfer of Tourism Knowledge and Tourism Results – Publishing Issues of the Future" - 2006
  9. Gutachter für The World Academy of Sciences for the advancement of science in developing countries (TWAS) der UNESCO
  10. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies (Fachzeitschrift)
  11. Fast or sustainable fashion? - The intersection of values and gender as triggers of consumer motivation
  12. EMO 2013
  13. Transferprozesse, Transferprojekte
  14. Hamburg-Vigoni Forum 2021
  15. The International Congress on the Problem Solving in Mathematics, ProMath 2004.
  16. 20 Years of Performance Measurement in Sustainable Supply Chain Management: What has been achieved?
  17. Language and Communication (Fachzeitschrift)
  18. Journal for Educational Research Online (Fachzeitschrift)
  19. The role of core self-evaluations in expatriate assignments
  20. Projektantrag
  21. Schulsprache in Lehrwerken - ein Qualitätsmerkmal oder -manko?
  22. International Conference on Renewable Resources and Biorefineries 2017
  23. Leibniz Universität Hannover
  24. Die Konkrete Utopie der Menschenrechte. Ein Blick zurück in die Zukunft - 2021
  25. Symposium on International Climate Protection - 2015
  26. Processing Uncertain Futures of Ukrainian Refugee Children in German Schools following the Russian Invasion
  27. NeuroPsychoEconomics Conference - 2006
  28. Rapping against Old and New Nazis: Musical Memories of Bejarano and Microphone Mafia
  29. Wie wir Hürden in der Klimakommunikation(sflut) erfolgreich meistern

Presse / Medien

  1. Reporting ramps up