Challenges and boundaries in implementing social return on investment: An inquiry into its situational appropriateness

Publikation: Beiträge in ZeitschriftenZeitschriftenaufsätzeForschungbegutachtet

Standard

Challenges and boundaries in implementing social return on investment: An inquiry into its situational appropriateness. / Nielsen, Janni Grouleff; Lueg, Rainer; van Liempd, Dennis.
in: Nonprofit Management & Leadership, Jahrgang 31, Nr. 3, 01.03.2021, S. 413-435.

Publikation: Beiträge in ZeitschriftenZeitschriftenaufsätzeForschungbegutachtet

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{13885d4ba8844f408b6ce4d2797f06c8,
title = "Challenges and boundaries in implementing social return on investment: An inquiry into its situational appropriateness",
abstract = "Nonprofit organizations (NPOs) and social enterprises are increasingly under pressure to justify their use of resources and report their impact on society. Frameworks that monetize social value such as social return on investment (SROI) have emerged as a response. The existing literature highlights many benefits and technical challenges of SROI, but largely ignores strategic and organizational learning aspects. This paper explores the use of SROI in an NPO conducting cultural heritage preservation. By analyzing the challenges managers face in agreeing on a reliable (“correct”) computation of SROI and in assessing the validity and relevance (“appropriateness”) of SROI, we seek to understand the challenges and boundaries of SROI. Challenges with a reliable computation of SROI are identifying stakeholders, the choice of proxies, the time horizons, and deadweight factors. Challenges with an appropriate SROI calculation are comparability, subjectivity, legitimacy, and resource utility. We argue that SROI calculations might not be reliable or appropriate in organizations with fuzzy purposes, broad value creation goals, broad target groups, very individual or subjective proxies, strongly lagged outcomes, complex or unobservable causality, and with lack of legitimacy among stakeholders. Organizations should not trustingly adopt SROI without being aware of these limitations.",
keywords = "Management studies, accounting, management, nonprofit, qualitative, research, sector",
author = "Nielsen, {Janni Grouleff} and Rainer Lueg and {van Liempd}, Dennis",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2020 The Authors. Nonprofit Management & Leadership published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.",
year = "2021",
month = mar,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1002/nml.21439",
language = "English",
volume = "31",
pages = "413--435",
journal = "Nonprofit Management & Leadership",
issn = "1048-6682",
publisher = "John Wiley & Sons Inc.",
number = "3",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Challenges and boundaries in implementing social return on investment

T2 - An inquiry into its situational appropriateness

AU - Nielsen, Janni Grouleff

AU - Lueg, Rainer

AU - van Liempd, Dennis

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2020 The Authors. Nonprofit Management & Leadership published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.

PY - 2021/3/1

Y1 - 2021/3/1

N2 - Nonprofit organizations (NPOs) and social enterprises are increasingly under pressure to justify their use of resources and report their impact on society. Frameworks that monetize social value such as social return on investment (SROI) have emerged as a response. The existing literature highlights many benefits and technical challenges of SROI, but largely ignores strategic and organizational learning aspects. This paper explores the use of SROI in an NPO conducting cultural heritage preservation. By analyzing the challenges managers face in agreeing on a reliable (“correct”) computation of SROI and in assessing the validity and relevance (“appropriateness”) of SROI, we seek to understand the challenges and boundaries of SROI. Challenges with a reliable computation of SROI are identifying stakeholders, the choice of proxies, the time horizons, and deadweight factors. Challenges with an appropriate SROI calculation are comparability, subjectivity, legitimacy, and resource utility. We argue that SROI calculations might not be reliable or appropriate in organizations with fuzzy purposes, broad value creation goals, broad target groups, very individual or subjective proxies, strongly lagged outcomes, complex or unobservable causality, and with lack of legitimacy among stakeholders. Organizations should not trustingly adopt SROI without being aware of these limitations.

AB - Nonprofit organizations (NPOs) and social enterprises are increasingly under pressure to justify their use of resources and report their impact on society. Frameworks that monetize social value such as social return on investment (SROI) have emerged as a response. The existing literature highlights many benefits and technical challenges of SROI, but largely ignores strategic and organizational learning aspects. This paper explores the use of SROI in an NPO conducting cultural heritage preservation. By analyzing the challenges managers face in agreeing on a reliable (“correct”) computation of SROI and in assessing the validity and relevance (“appropriateness”) of SROI, we seek to understand the challenges and boundaries of SROI. Challenges with a reliable computation of SROI are identifying stakeholders, the choice of proxies, the time horizons, and deadweight factors. Challenges with an appropriate SROI calculation are comparability, subjectivity, legitimacy, and resource utility. We argue that SROI calculations might not be reliable or appropriate in organizations with fuzzy purposes, broad value creation goals, broad target groups, very individual or subjective proxies, strongly lagged outcomes, complex or unobservable causality, and with lack of legitimacy among stakeholders. Organizations should not trustingly adopt SROI without being aware of these limitations.

KW - Management studies

KW - accounting

KW - management

KW - nonprofit

KW - qualitative

KW - research

KW - sector

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85089568467&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/nml.21439

DO - 10.1002/nml.21439

M3 - Journal articles

VL - 31

SP - 413

EP - 435

JO - Nonprofit Management & Leadership

JF - Nonprofit Management & Leadership

SN - 1048-6682

IS - 3

ER -

Dokumente

DOI

Zuletzt angesehen

Publikationen

  1. An Interactive Layers Model of Self-Regulated Learning and Cognitive Load
  2. Knowledge transfer during the integration of knowledge-intensive acquisitions
  3. Deciding between the Covariance Analytical Approach and the Change-Score Approach in Two Wave Panel Data
  4. Dynamic efficiency and path dependencies in venture capital markets
  5. Machine Learning Applications in Convective Turbulence
  6. Anomalous Results in G-Factor Models
  7. Teachers’ temporary support and worked-out examples as elements of scaffolding in mathematical modeling
  8. Timing matters: Distinct effects of nitrogen and phosphorus fertilizer application timing on root system architecture responses
  9. Study of Single Filament Dielectric Barrier Discharge in Argon
  10. Clashing Values
  11. Micro and Macro Perspectives in Organization Theory
  12. Technical concept and evaluation design of the state subsidized project [Level-Q]
  13. Towards a Comprehensive Framework for Environmental Management Accounting
  14. Missing links
  15. Does an individualized learning design improve university student online learning? A randomized field experiment
  16. Separable models for interconnected production-inventory systems
  17. Efficacy of a Web-Based Intervention With Mobile Phone Support in Treating Depressive Symptoms in Adults With Type 1 and Type 2 Diabetes
  18. Hacking the Classroom
  19. Mixed Pickels
  20. Combining sense of place theory with the ecosystem services concept: empirical insights and reflections from a participatory mapping study
  21. Dynamic Semantic Web Content for Museum Guides
  22. Knowledge Decolonization à la Grounded Theory
  23. Artificial intelligence
  24. Toward Automatically Labeling Situations in Soccer

Presse / Medien

  1. I am not a Hacker