Addressing the financing needs of the European Union through three C’s: Reforming Cohesion and CAP funds and communicate European funding efforts to stakeholders and citizens

Publikation: Arbeits- oder Diskussionspapiere und BerichteArbeits- oder Diskussionspapiere

Authors

The EU’s struggle for more financial resources has been a constant feature of European
integration, as has the struggle for budgetary reform. A key problem is the transfer nature of the budget, which pits contributors against recipients, with all Member States clinging to the predictability of the budget and hindering substantive reform processes. In the absence of a flexible budget for public goods at the EU level, we therefore struggle to act in budgetary solidarity across issues and over time and tend to pit national interests against each other.
There are ways around the rigid structure of the EU budget: NGEU-type financing is one
possibility, as the temporary nature of a budgetary instrument makes it easier to agree and predict the financial consequences for each Member State. However, a holistic approach to EU financing should first be based on reforming the two big “C’s” in the budget: the Cohesion funds and the CAP, which are in urgent need of reform because they are not working as we want them to. Reforming these funds must become a priority and will allow us to redirect financial resources. The focus of this policy brief is that:
- CAP and Cohesion funds require substantial reform,
- Communicating these reform processes to stakeholders, interest groups and citizens is key
OriginalspracheEnglisch
VerlagTEPSA - Transeuropean policy studies assiciation
Band2024
Seiten1-2
Anzahl der Seiten2
PublikationsstatusErschienen - 05.2024

Zuletzt angesehen

Forschende

  1. Axel Sommer

Publikationen

  1. The state of the internets
  2. Tetrabutylammonium prolinate-based ionic liquids
  3. Keller, James A.: Problems of Evil and the Power of God, Aldershot 2007
  4. Applying thematic analysis to analyse press coverage in cross-country comparative research
  5. Intentions and synergies: The cases of control and speed
  6. Technological opportunities and their rejection
  7. Substrate preference determines macrofungal biogeography in the greater Mekong Sub-Region
  8. Monument for a Forgotten Future
  9. Integrated reporting with CSR practices
  10. The Contemplative Conditions of a Moral Action
  11. Constructed Wetlands Integrated with Advanced Oxidation Processes in Wastewater Treatment for Reuse
  12. Lichtdouble
  13. Kindergarten und Grundschule zwischen Differenzierung und Integration
  14. Der Fremdsprachliche Unterricht Englisch
  15. Molnar, Paul D.: Thomas F. Torrance – Theologian of the Trinity. Farnham: Ashgate 2009
  16. Was wissen Grundschulkinder über den Computer als Schreibwerkzeug?
  17. Mainstreaming biodiversity
  18. Students' conceptions about the sense of smell
  19. Konflikt
  20. Ambiguous Effects of Risk Aversion on Healthy Nutrition
  21. The Hanoverian Supply Chain Model: modelling the impact of production planning and control on a supply chain's logistic objectives
  22. “Greedy Buyers, Amoral Speculators and Lacking State Control”
  23. Kommentierung von Art. 2 EUV: Werte der Union
  24. To assess progress in the social sciences, we should study knowledge cumulation, not disruptiveness
  25. Q SGB
  26. Cooperative Internationalization of SMEs: Self-commitment as a Success Factor for International Entrepreneurship