Addressing the financing needs of the European Union through three C’s: Reforming Cohesion and CAP funds and communicate European funding efforts to stakeholders and citizens

Research output: Working paperWorking papers

Authors

The EU’s struggle for more financial resources has been a constant feature of European
integration, as has the struggle for budgetary reform. A key problem is the transfer nature of the budget, which pits contributors against recipients, with all Member States clinging to the predictability of the budget and hindering substantive reform processes. In the absence of a flexible budget for public goods at the EU level, we therefore struggle to act in budgetary solidarity across issues and over time and tend to pit national interests against each other.
There are ways around the rigid structure of the EU budget: NGEU-type financing is one
possibility, as the temporary nature of a budgetary instrument makes it easier to agree and predict the financial consequences for each Member State. However, a holistic approach to EU financing should first be based on reforming the two big “C’s” in the budget: the Cohesion funds and the CAP, which are in urgent need of reform because they are not working as we want them to. Reforming these funds must become a priority and will allow us to redirect financial resources. The focus of this policy brief is that:
- CAP and Cohesion funds require substantial reform,
- Communicating these reform processes to stakeholders, interest groups and citizens is key
Original languageEnglish
PublisherTEPSA - Transeuropean policy studies assiciation
Volume2024
Pages1-2
Number of pages2
Publication statusPublished - 05.2024

Recently viewed

Researchers

  1. Georg Reischauer

Publications

  1. Towards a Critique of Social Networking
  2. Revisions and further developments of the Occupational Stress Indicator
  3. Introduction: A strategy for overcoming the definitional struggle
  4. Essential ecosystem service variables for monitoring progress towards sustainability
  5. On the impact of network size and average degree on the robustness of centrality measures
  6. Microsatellites and allozymes as the genetic memory of habitat fragmentation and defragmentation in populations of the ground beetle Carabus auronitens (Col., Carabidae)
  7. An indirectly controlled high-speed servo valve for IC engines using piezo actuators
  8. Relative wage positions and quit behavior
  9. Dynamics of Supply Chains Under Mixed Production Strategies
  10. "Lob des Unscheinbaren"
  11. Sensitive, simultaneous determination of P, S, Cl, Br and I containing pesticides in environmental samples by GC hyphenated with collision-cell ICP-MS
  12. Personal need for structure as a boundary condition for humor in leadership
  13. Key landscape features in the provision of ecosystem services
  14. Widening the evaluative space for ecosystem services
  15. Interkulturelle Differenzen im Selbstkonzept von Managern
  16. Crowdsourcing Hypothesis Tests
  17. Strategies to Induce Non-cooperating Countries to Join a Climate-policy Coalition
  18. Die WTO
  19. Konzeptionsentwicklung – eine Einführung
  20. Vicki Baum und Gina Kaus
  21. Corporate Social Responsibility in Innovation: Insights from two Cases of Syngenta's Activities in Genetically Modified Organisms
  22. Rechtskonformität
  23. § 44 VwGO (Objektive Klagehäufung)
  24. § 395: Verschwiegensheitspflicht
  25. The moderating role of experience on the relationship between trust and performance of cooperating SMEs in transformation economies
  26. Educating sustainability change agents by design
  27. “They Are Stumbling Around Quite Helplessly”: How Supporters of Refugee Families Frame Vulnerability and Agency Relating to Childcare
  28. Patient-reported outcomes in rehabilitation research
  29. Diagramme aus der Zeitung
  30. Itineraria Picta: Itineraria Scripta
  31. Kommentierung zu Art. 221 AEUV