A direct test of the similarity assumption — Focusing on differences as compared with similarities decreases automatic imitation

Publikation: Beiträge in ZeitschriftenZeitschriftenaufsätzeForschungbegutachtet

Standard

A direct test of the similarity assumption — Focusing on differences as compared with similarities decreases automatic imitation. / Genschow, Oliver; Cracco, Emiel; Verbeke, Pieter et al.
in: Cognition, Jahrgang 215, 104824, 01.10.2021.

Publikation: Beiträge in ZeitschriftenZeitschriftenaufsätzeForschungbegutachtet

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Genschow O, Cracco E, Verbeke P, Westfal M, Crusius J. A direct test of the similarity assumption — Focusing on differences as compared with similarities decreases automatic imitation. Cognition. 2021 Okt 1;215:104824. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2021.104824

Bibtex

@article{2fb1fc1c2ffb44bf8795a241c2eb60a7,
title = "A direct test of the similarity assumption — Focusing on differences as compared with similarities decreases automatic imitation",
abstract = "Individuals automatically imitate a wide range of different behaviors. Previous research suggests that imitation as a social process depends on the similarity between interaction partners. However, some of the experiments supporting this notion could not be replicated and all of the supporting experiments manipulated not only similarity between actor and observer, but also other features. Thus, the existing evidence leaves open whether similarity as such moderates automatic imitation. To directly test the similarity account, in four experiments, we manipulated participants' focus on similarities or differences while holding the stimulus material constant. In Experiment 1, we presented participants with a hand and let them either focus on similarities, differences, or neutral aspects between their own hand and the other person's hand. The results indicate that focusing on similarities increased perceived similarity between the own and the other person's hand. In Experiments 2 to 4, we tested the hypothesis that focusing on similarities, as compared with differences, increases automatic imitation. Experiment 2 tested the basic effect and found support for our prediction. Experiment 3 and 4 replicated this finding with higher-powered samples. Exploratory investigations further suggest that it is a focus on differences that decreases automatic imitation, and not a focus on similarities that increases automatic imitation. Theoretical implications and future directions are discussed.",
keywords = "Automatic imitation, Comparison processes, Motor learning, Similarity, Business psychology",
author = "Oliver Genschow and Emiel Cracco and Pieter Verbeke and Mareike Westfal and Jan Crusius",
note = "Funding Information: This work was supported by a grant from the German Research Foundation (DFG; funding ID: GE 3040/2-1 ) as part of the DFG Research Unit “Relativity in Social Cognition” (FOR 2150) Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2021 Elsevier B.V.",
year = "2021",
month = oct,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.cognition.2021.104824",
language = "English",
volume = "215",
journal = "Cognition",
issn = "0010-0277",
publisher = "Elsevier B.V.",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - A direct test of the similarity assumption — Focusing on differences as compared with similarities decreases automatic imitation

AU - Genschow, Oliver

AU - Cracco, Emiel

AU - Verbeke, Pieter

AU - Westfal, Mareike

AU - Crusius, Jan

N1 - Funding Information: This work was supported by a grant from the German Research Foundation (DFG; funding ID: GE 3040/2-1 ) as part of the DFG Research Unit “Relativity in Social Cognition” (FOR 2150) Publisher Copyright: © 2021 Elsevier B.V.

PY - 2021/10/1

Y1 - 2021/10/1

N2 - Individuals automatically imitate a wide range of different behaviors. Previous research suggests that imitation as a social process depends on the similarity between interaction partners. However, some of the experiments supporting this notion could not be replicated and all of the supporting experiments manipulated not only similarity between actor and observer, but also other features. Thus, the existing evidence leaves open whether similarity as such moderates automatic imitation. To directly test the similarity account, in four experiments, we manipulated participants' focus on similarities or differences while holding the stimulus material constant. In Experiment 1, we presented participants with a hand and let them either focus on similarities, differences, or neutral aspects between their own hand and the other person's hand. The results indicate that focusing on similarities increased perceived similarity between the own and the other person's hand. In Experiments 2 to 4, we tested the hypothesis that focusing on similarities, as compared with differences, increases automatic imitation. Experiment 2 tested the basic effect and found support for our prediction. Experiment 3 and 4 replicated this finding with higher-powered samples. Exploratory investigations further suggest that it is a focus on differences that decreases automatic imitation, and not a focus on similarities that increases automatic imitation. Theoretical implications and future directions are discussed.

AB - Individuals automatically imitate a wide range of different behaviors. Previous research suggests that imitation as a social process depends on the similarity between interaction partners. However, some of the experiments supporting this notion could not be replicated and all of the supporting experiments manipulated not only similarity between actor and observer, but also other features. Thus, the existing evidence leaves open whether similarity as such moderates automatic imitation. To directly test the similarity account, in four experiments, we manipulated participants' focus on similarities or differences while holding the stimulus material constant. In Experiment 1, we presented participants with a hand and let them either focus on similarities, differences, or neutral aspects between their own hand and the other person's hand. The results indicate that focusing on similarities increased perceived similarity between the own and the other person's hand. In Experiments 2 to 4, we tested the hypothesis that focusing on similarities, as compared with differences, increases automatic imitation. Experiment 2 tested the basic effect and found support for our prediction. Experiment 3 and 4 replicated this finding with higher-powered samples. Exploratory investigations further suggest that it is a focus on differences that decreases automatic imitation, and not a focus on similarities that increases automatic imitation. Theoretical implications and future directions are discussed.

KW - Automatic imitation

KW - Comparison processes

KW - Motor learning

KW - Similarity

KW - Business psychology

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85110143967&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.cognition.2021.104824

DO - 10.1016/j.cognition.2021.104824

M3 - Journal articles

C2 - 34242855

AN - SCOPUS:85110143967

VL - 215

JO - Cognition

JF - Cognition

SN - 0010-0277

M1 - 104824

ER -

DOI

Zuletzt angesehen

Forschende

  1. Matthias Gaßmann

Aktivitäten

  1. Challenges for the Positioning of Destinations: Destination Formation Processes and Territorial Boundaries
  2. Universität Boston
  3. Connect and Divide. The Practice Turn in Media Studies
  4. Ocean eddies and the polar vortex: coherence in complex systems
  5. A mobile phone supported internet-based intervention for depressive symptoms in diabetes mellitus type 1 and type 2: design of a randomized controlled trial
  6. Urban spaces of possibility and imaginaries of sustainability
  7. Conference - The 8th International Federation of Automatic Control Symposium on System Structure and Control (SSSC) , Montreal, Canada
  8. Network-based analysis of Lagrangian transport and mixing
  9. Liquidity, Flows, Circulation: The Cultural Logic of Environmentalization (1st part)
  10. On Rhythming
  11. Project-based and other activating strategies and issues of science education - PBE 2021
  12. Do program helpfulness ratings predict engagement in an online eating disorder intervention?
  13. Begriffsdefinitionen in der Interkulturellen Arbeit
  14. „Reichsbürger and Temporalities“
  15. 'Re': Zu Ästhetiken der Wiederholung 2011
  16. 2nd International Conference on Control, Decision and Information Technologies - CoDIT 2014
  17. Rethinking Gamification Workshop- 2013
  18. Springer Verlag (Verlag)
  19. Workshop Methoden der Medienwissenschaft - 2015
  20. Future Earth Secretariat (Externe Organisation)
  21. “Doing Justice! Doing Just This! Understanding justice in transdisciplinary and transformative research”: LRN Summer School
  22. Schulleitung in Zeiten der Krise: Heraus- oder doch Überforderung? (Discussant)

Publikationen

  1. Jointly experimenting for transformation?
  2. Meeting the challenge of (co-)designing real-world laboratories
  3. HPLC and chemometrics-assisted UV-spectroscopy methods for the simultaneous determination of ambroxol and doxycycline in capsule.
  4. A matter of connection
  5. Structuring and advancing solution-oriented research for sustainability
  6. Integrating a piezoelectric actuator with mechanical and hydraulic devices to control camless engines
  7. How and Why Different Forms of Expertise Moderate Anchor Precision in Price Decisions
  8. Development and validation of a stability-indicating RP-HPLC method for the determination of paracetamol with dantrolene or/and cetirizine and pseudoephedrine in two pharmaceutical dosage forms
  9. A framework to enable sustainability-oriented transition activities in HEIs
  10. Expert*inneninterview
  11. Reconstructing the “biopiracy” debate from a justice perspective
  12. On the combined effect of soil fertility and topography on tree growth in subtropical forest ecosystems - a study from SE China
  13. Narrative dialogic reading with wordless picture books
  14. Bank management of the net interest margin
  15. Analysis of ammonia losses after field application of biogas slurries by an empirical model
  16. Consequence evaluations and moral concerns about climate change
  17. Planning for Sea Spaces I: Processes, Practices and Future Perspectives
  18. Broad values as the basis for understanding deliberation about protected area management
  19. Article 66 CISG
  20. Power centres
  21. Mental models and attentional processes in car driving
  22. Technik – Magie – Medium
  23. Investigation of the deformation behavior of Fe-3%Si sheet metal with large grains via crystal plasticity and finite-element modeling