A direct test of the similarity assumption — Focusing on differences as compared with similarities decreases automatic imitation

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Standard

A direct test of the similarity assumption — Focusing on differences as compared with similarities decreases automatic imitation. / Genschow, Oliver; Cracco, Emiel; Verbeke, Pieter et al.
In: Cognition, Vol. 215, 104824, 01.10.2021.

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Genschow O, Cracco E, Verbeke P, Westfal M, Crusius J. A direct test of the similarity assumption — Focusing on differences as compared with similarities decreases automatic imitation. Cognition. 2021 Oct 1;215:104824. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2021.104824

Bibtex

@article{2fb1fc1c2ffb44bf8795a241c2eb60a7,
title = "A direct test of the similarity assumption — Focusing on differences as compared with similarities decreases automatic imitation",
abstract = "Individuals automatically imitate a wide range of different behaviors. Previous research suggests that imitation as a social process depends on the similarity between interaction partners. However, some of the experiments supporting this notion could not be replicated and all of the supporting experiments manipulated not only similarity between actor and observer, but also other features. Thus, the existing evidence leaves open whether similarity as such moderates automatic imitation. To directly test the similarity account, in four experiments, we manipulated participants' focus on similarities or differences while holding the stimulus material constant. In Experiment 1, we presented participants with a hand and let them either focus on similarities, differences, or neutral aspects between their own hand and the other person's hand. The results indicate that focusing on similarities increased perceived similarity between the own and the other person's hand. In Experiments 2 to 4, we tested the hypothesis that focusing on similarities, as compared with differences, increases automatic imitation. Experiment 2 tested the basic effect and found support for our prediction. Experiment 3 and 4 replicated this finding with higher-powered samples. Exploratory investigations further suggest that it is a focus on differences that decreases automatic imitation, and not a focus on similarities that increases automatic imitation. Theoretical implications and future directions are discussed.",
keywords = "Automatic imitation, Comparison processes, Motor learning, Similarity, Business psychology",
author = "Oliver Genschow and Emiel Cracco and Pieter Verbeke and Mareike Westfal and Jan Crusius",
note = "Funding Information: This work was supported by a grant from the German Research Foundation (DFG; funding ID: GE 3040/2-1 ) as part of the DFG Research Unit “Relativity in Social Cognition” (FOR 2150) Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2021 Elsevier B.V.",
year = "2021",
month = oct,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.cognition.2021.104824",
language = "English",
volume = "215",
journal = "Cognition",
issn = "0010-0277",
publisher = "Elsevier B.V.",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - A direct test of the similarity assumption — Focusing on differences as compared with similarities decreases automatic imitation

AU - Genschow, Oliver

AU - Cracco, Emiel

AU - Verbeke, Pieter

AU - Westfal, Mareike

AU - Crusius, Jan

N1 - Funding Information: This work was supported by a grant from the German Research Foundation (DFG; funding ID: GE 3040/2-1 ) as part of the DFG Research Unit “Relativity in Social Cognition” (FOR 2150) Publisher Copyright: © 2021 Elsevier B.V.

PY - 2021/10/1

Y1 - 2021/10/1

N2 - Individuals automatically imitate a wide range of different behaviors. Previous research suggests that imitation as a social process depends on the similarity between interaction partners. However, some of the experiments supporting this notion could not be replicated and all of the supporting experiments manipulated not only similarity between actor and observer, but also other features. Thus, the existing evidence leaves open whether similarity as such moderates automatic imitation. To directly test the similarity account, in four experiments, we manipulated participants' focus on similarities or differences while holding the stimulus material constant. In Experiment 1, we presented participants with a hand and let them either focus on similarities, differences, or neutral aspects between their own hand and the other person's hand. The results indicate that focusing on similarities increased perceived similarity between the own and the other person's hand. In Experiments 2 to 4, we tested the hypothesis that focusing on similarities, as compared with differences, increases automatic imitation. Experiment 2 tested the basic effect and found support for our prediction. Experiment 3 and 4 replicated this finding with higher-powered samples. Exploratory investigations further suggest that it is a focus on differences that decreases automatic imitation, and not a focus on similarities that increases automatic imitation. Theoretical implications and future directions are discussed.

AB - Individuals automatically imitate a wide range of different behaviors. Previous research suggests that imitation as a social process depends on the similarity between interaction partners. However, some of the experiments supporting this notion could not be replicated and all of the supporting experiments manipulated not only similarity between actor and observer, but also other features. Thus, the existing evidence leaves open whether similarity as such moderates automatic imitation. To directly test the similarity account, in four experiments, we manipulated participants' focus on similarities or differences while holding the stimulus material constant. In Experiment 1, we presented participants with a hand and let them either focus on similarities, differences, or neutral aspects between their own hand and the other person's hand. The results indicate that focusing on similarities increased perceived similarity between the own and the other person's hand. In Experiments 2 to 4, we tested the hypothesis that focusing on similarities, as compared with differences, increases automatic imitation. Experiment 2 tested the basic effect and found support for our prediction. Experiment 3 and 4 replicated this finding with higher-powered samples. Exploratory investigations further suggest that it is a focus on differences that decreases automatic imitation, and not a focus on similarities that increases automatic imitation. Theoretical implications and future directions are discussed.

KW - Automatic imitation

KW - Comparison processes

KW - Motor learning

KW - Similarity

KW - Business psychology

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85110143967&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.cognition.2021.104824

DO - 10.1016/j.cognition.2021.104824

M3 - Journal articles

C2 - 34242855

AN - SCOPUS:85110143967

VL - 215

JO - Cognition

JF - Cognition

SN - 0010-0277

M1 - 104824

ER -

Recently viewed

Publications

  1. Sliding Mode Control Strategies for Maglev Systems Based on Kalman Filtering
  2. Self-perceived quality of life predicts mortality risk better than a multi-biomarker panel, but the combination of both does best
  3. Multiobjective optimal control of fluid mixing
  4. Trajectory tracking using MPC and a velocity observer for flat actuator systems in automotive applications
  5. Toward Data-Driven Analyses of Electronic Text Books
  6. Design, Modeling and Control of an Over-actuated Hexacopter Tilt-Rotor
  7. Distributable Modular Software Framework for Manufacturing Systems
  8. Confidence levels and likelihood terms in IPCC reports
  9. Determination of the construction and the material identity values of outside building components with the help of in-situ measuring procedures and FEM-simulation calculations
  10. Natural enemy diversity reduces temporal variability in wasp but not bee parasitism
  11. Microstructure and mechanical properties of as-cast Mg-Sn-Ca alloys and effect of alloying elements
  12. Continued logarithm representation of real numbers
  13. Graph-based Approaches for Analyzing Team Interaction on the Example of Soccer
  14. Principals between exploitation and exploration
  15. Geometric series with randomly increasing exponents
  16. Do Linguistic Features Influence Item Difficulty in Physics Assessments?
  17. Detection of oscillations with application in the pantograph control
  18. A dissociation between two classes of spatial abilities in elementary school children
  19. Export Boosting Policies and Firm Performance
  20. Exploring the implications of the value concept for performance assessment of sustainable business models
  21. A piezo servo hydraulic actuator for use in camless combustion engines and its control with MPC
  22. Smart Multi-coil Inductive Power Tranmission with IoT Based Visulization
  23. Light availability and land-use history drive biodiversity and functional changes in forest herb layer communities
  24. Chronic effects of a static stretching intervention program on range of motion and tissue hardness in older adults
  25. Transdisciplinary co-creation increases the utilization of knowledge from sustainable development research
  26. A Sensitive Microsystem as Biosensor for Cell Growth Monitoring and Antibiotic Testing
  27. Logistical Potentials of Load Balancing via the Build-up and Reduction of Stock
  28. Discrete Lyapunov Controllers for an Actuator in Camless Engines
  29. Control of a two-thermoelectric-cooler system for ice-clamping application using Lyapunov based approach
  30. Knowledge Graph Question Answering Datasets and Their Generalizability
  31. An intersection test for the cointegrating rank in dependent panel data
  32. Improve a 3D distance measurement accuracy in stereo vision systems using optimization methods’ approach
  33. An optimal minimum phase approximating PD regulator for robust control of a throttle plate
  34. Learner characteristics and information processing in multimedia learning
  35. Controlling a Bank Model Economy by Sliding Mode Control with Help of Kalman Filter
  36. rSOESGOPE Method Applied to Four-Tank System Modeling
  37. Spatial Tests, Familiarity with the Surroundings, and Spatial Activity Experience
  38. Passive Rotation Compensation in Parallel Kinematics Using Quaternions
  39. Performance of methods to select landscape metrics for modelling species richness
  40. The Relation of Children's Performances in Spatial Tasks at Two Different Scales of Space
  41. Modelling ammonia emissions after field application of biogas slurries
  42. Comparing marginal effects between different models and/or samples
  43. Representation of Integration Profiles Using an Ontology