A direct test of the similarity assumption — Focusing on differences as compared with similarities decreases automatic imitation

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Standard

A direct test of the similarity assumption — Focusing on differences as compared with similarities decreases automatic imitation. / Genschow, Oliver; Cracco, Emiel; Verbeke, Pieter et al.
In: Cognition, Vol. 215, 104824, 01.10.2021.

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Genschow O, Cracco E, Verbeke P, Westfal M, Crusius J. A direct test of the similarity assumption — Focusing on differences as compared with similarities decreases automatic imitation. Cognition. 2021 Oct 1;215:104824. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2021.104824

Bibtex

@article{2fb1fc1c2ffb44bf8795a241c2eb60a7,
title = "A direct test of the similarity assumption — Focusing on differences as compared with similarities decreases automatic imitation",
abstract = "Individuals automatically imitate a wide range of different behaviors. Previous research suggests that imitation as a social process depends on the similarity between interaction partners. However, some of the experiments supporting this notion could not be replicated and all of the supporting experiments manipulated not only similarity between actor and observer, but also other features. Thus, the existing evidence leaves open whether similarity as such moderates automatic imitation. To directly test the similarity account, in four experiments, we manipulated participants' focus on similarities or differences while holding the stimulus material constant. In Experiment 1, we presented participants with a hand and let them either focus on similarities, differences, or neutral aspects between their own hand and the other person's hand. The results indicate that focusing on similarities increased perceived similarity between the own and the other person's hand. In Experiments 2 to 4, we tested the hypothesis that focusing on similarities, as compared with differences, increases automatic imitation. Experiment 2 tested the basic effect and found support for our prediction. Experiment 3 and 4 replicated this finding with higher-powered samples. Exploratory investigations further suggest that it is a focus on differences that decreases automatic imitation, and not a focus on similarities that increases automatic imitation. Theoretical implications and future directions are discussed.",
keywords = "Automatic imitation, Comparison processes, Motor learning, Similarity, Business psychology",
author = "Oliver Genschow and Emiel Cracco and Pieter Verbeke and Mareike Westfal and Jan Crusius",
note = "Funding Information: This work was supported by a grant from the German Research Foundation (DFG; funding ID: GE 3040/2-1 ) as part of the DFG Research Unit “Relativity in Social Cognition” (FOR 2150) Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2021 Elsevier B.V.",
year = "2021",
month = oct,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.cognition.2021.104824",
language = "English",
volume = "215",
journal = "Cognition",
issn = "0010-0277",
publisher = "Elsevier B.V.",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - A direct test of the similarity assumption — Focusing on differences as compared with similarities decreases automatic imitation

AU - Genschow, Oliver

AU - Cracco, Emiel

AU - Verbeke, Pieter

AU - Westfal, Mareike

AU - Crusius, Jan

N1 - Funding Information: This work was supported by a grant from the German Research Foundation (DFG; funding ID: GE 3040/2-1 ) as part of the DFG Research Unit “Relativity in Social Cognition” (FOR 2150) Publisher Copyright: © 2021 Elsevier B.V.

PY - 2021/10/1

Y1 - 2021/10/1

N2 - Individuals automatically imitate a wide range of different behaviors. Previous research suggests that imitation as a social process depends on the similarity between interaction partners. However, some of the experiments supporting this notion could not be replicated and all of the supporting experiments manipulated not only similarity between actor and observer, but also other features. Thus, the existing evidence leaves open whether similarity as such moderates automatic imitation. To directly test the similarity account, in four experiments, we manipulated participants' focus on similarities or differences while holding the stimulus material constant. In Experiment 1, we presented participants with a hand and let them either focus on similarities, differences, or neutral aspects between their own hand and the other person's hand. The results indicate that focusing on similarities increased perceived similarity between the own and the other person's hand. In Experiments 2 to 4, we tested the hypothesis that focusing on similarities, as compared with differences, increases automatic imitation. Experiment 2 tested the basic effect and found support for our prediction. Experiment 3 and 4 replicated this finding with higher-powered samples. Exploratory investigations further suggest that it is a focus on differences that decreases automatic imitation, and not a focus on similarities that increases automatic imitation. Theoretical implications and future directions are discussed.

AB - Individuals automatically imitate a wide range of different behaviors. Previous research suggests that imitation as a social process depends on the similarity between interaction partners. However, some of the experiments supporting this notion could not be replicated and all of the supporting experiments manipulated not only similarity between actor and observer, but also other features. Thus, the existing evidence leaves open whether similarity as such moderates automatic imitation. To directly test the similarity account, in four experiments, we manipulated participants' focus on similarities or differences while holding the stimulus material constant. In Experiment 1, we presented participants with a hand and let them either focus on similarities, differences, or neutral aspects between their own hand and the other person's hand. The results indicate that focusing on similarities increased perceived similarity between the own and the other person's hand. In Experiments 2 to 4, we tested the hypothesis that focusing on similarities, as compared with differences, increases automatic imitation. Experiment 2 tested the basic effect and found support for our prediction. Experiment 3 and 4 replicated this finding with higher-powered samples. Exploratory investigations further suggest that it is a focus on differences that decreases automatic imitation, and not a focus on similarities that increases automatic imitation. Theoretical implications and future directions are discussed.

KW - Automatic imitation

KW - Comparison processes

KW - Motor learning

KW - Similarity

KW - Business psychology

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85110143967&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.cognition.2021.104824

DO - 10.1016/j.cognition.2021.104824

M3 - Journal articles

C2 - 34242855

AN - SCOPUS:85110143967

VL - 215

JO - Cognition

JF - Cognition

SN - 0010-0277

M1 - 104824

ER -