Value-based management in banking: The effects on shareholder returns
Research output: Journal contributions › Journal articles › Research › peer-review
Standard
In: International Journal of Business Science and Applied Management, Vol. 14, No. 1, 2019, p. 35-50.
Research output: Journal contributions › Journal articles › Research › peer-review
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Value-based management in banking
T2 - The effects on shareholder returns
AU - Schmaltz, Christian
AU - Lueg, Rainer
AU - Agerholm, Jesper
AU - Wittrup, Kasper
PY - 2019
Y1 - 2019
N2 - In this study, we explore the drivers of total shareholder returns (TSR) in commercial banks, and investigate whether banks subscribing to Value-based Management (VBM) outperform the nonadopters in terms of TSR. We estimate a TSR model using data from 132 listed commercial European and North American banks. First, we demonstrate that banks that have publicly adopted VBM in their operative Management Control Systems (MCS) outperform non-VBM-banks. On average, VBM-adopters generate a 5.8%-points higher annual TSR. They also outperform non-VBM-banks in terms of profitability, growth, and liquidity. Second, we find that banks focus on key performance indicators (KPIs) such as the cost-income ratio, which are sub-optimal indicators of TSR. We suggest the implementation of indicators that are more closely related to TSR, such as return on assets or loan loss provisioning. So far, only a few banks (10%-45%) have considered these KPIs in their MCS. A shift towards our suggested KPIs might even further improve the performance of VBM-adopters. Controlling for macro-economic factors, our findings are stable before and after the financial crisis in 2008.
AB - In this study, we explore the drivers of total shareholder returns (TSR) in commercial banks, and investigate whether banks subscribing to Value-based Management (VBM) outperform the nonadopters in terms of TSR. We estimate a TSR model using data from 132 listed commercial European and North American banks. First, we demonstrate that banks that have publicly adopted VBM in their operative Management Control Systems (MCS) outperform non-VBM-banks. On average, VBM-adopters generate a 5.8%-points higher annual TSR. They also outperform non-VBM-banks in terms of profitability, growth, and liquidity. Second, we find that banks focus on key performance indicators (KPIs) such as the cost-income ratio, which are sub-optimal indicators of TSR. We suggest the implementation of indicators that are more closely related to TSR, such as return on assets or loan loss provisioning. So far, only a few banks (10%-45%) have considered these KPIs in their MCS. A shift towards our suggested KPIs might even further improve the performance of VBM-adopters. Controlling for macro-economic factors, our findings are stable before and after the financial crisis in 2008.
KW - Banks
KW - Total shareholder return
KW - Value drivers
KW - Value-based management
KW - Management studies
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85088024756&partnerID=8YFLogxK
M3 - Journal articles
AN - SCOPUS:85088024756
VL - 14
SP - 35
EP - 50
JO - International Journal of Business Science and Applied Management
JF - International Journal of Business Science and Applied Management
SN - 1753-0296
IS - 1
ER -