Utilities' Business Models for Renewable Energy: A Review

Research output: Journal contributionsScientific review articlesResearch

Standard

Utilities' Business Models for Renewable Energy: A Review. / Richter, Mario.
In: Renewable & Sustainble Energy Reviews, Vol. 16, No. 5, 06.2012, p. 2483-2493.

Research output: Journal contributionsScientific review articlesResearch

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{d501678a40ba42aeadf4866aee5bd3bf,
title = "Utilities' Business Models for Renewable Energy: A Review",
abstract = "The transformation of today's electric power sector to a more sustainable energy production based on renewable energies will change the structure of the industry. Consequently, utilities as the major stakeholders in this transformation will face new challenges in their way of doing business. They will have to adapt their business models to remain competitive in the new energy landscape. The present review of business model literature shows that two basic choices exist: utility-side business models and customer-side business models. The two approaches follow a very different logic of value creation. While the former is based on a small number of large projects, the latter is based on a large number of small projects. The article reveals that blueprints for utility-side business models are available, whereas customer-side business models are in an early stage of development. Applying the business model framework as an analytical tool, it is found that existing utility-side business models comprise a series of advantages for utilities in terms of revenue potential and risk avoidance. This study provides new insights about why utilities will favor utility-side business models over customer-side business models and why they also should engage in customer-side business models in their quest for more sustainable future business models.",
keywords = "Sustainability sciences, Management & Economics, Analytical tool, Business models, Electric power sector, Energy landscape, Large project, Renewable energies, Revenue potential, Risk avoidance, Sustainable energy, value creation, Energy research",
author = "Mario Richter",
year = "2012",
month = jun,
doi = "10.1016/j.rser.2012.01.072",
language = "English",
volume = "16",
pages = "2483--2493",
journal = "Renewable & Sustainble Energy Reviews",
issn = "1364-0321",
publisher = "Elsevier Ltd",
number = "5",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Utilities' Business Models for Renewable Energy

T2 - A Review

AU - Richter, Mario

PY - 2012/6

Y1 - 2012/6

N2 - The transformation of today's electric power sector to a more sustainable energy production based on renewable energies will change the structure of the industry. Consequently, utilities as the major stakeholders in this transformation will face new challenges in their way of doing business. They will have to adapt their business models to remain competitive in the new energy landscape. The present review of business model literature shows that two basic choices exist: utility-side business models and customer-side business models. The two approaches follow a very different logic of value creation. While the former is based on a small number of large projects, the latter is based on a large number of small projects. The article reveals that blueprints for utility-side business models are available, whereas customer-side business models are in an early stage of development. Applying the business model framework as an analytical tool, it is found that existing utility-side business models comprise a series of advantages for utilities in terms of revenue potential and risk avoidance. This study provides new insights about why utilities will favor utility-side business models over customer-side business models and why they also should engage in customer-side business models in their quest for more sustainable future business models.

AB - The transformation of today's electric power sector to a more sustainable energy production based on renewable energies will change the structure of the industry. Consequently, utilities as the major stakeholders in this transformation will face new challenges in their way of doing business. They will have to adapt their business models to remain competitive in the new energy landscape. The present review of business model literature shows that two basic choices exist: utility-side business models and customer-side business models. The two approaches follow a very different logic of value creation. While the former is based on a small number of large projects, the latter is based on a large number of small projects. The article reveals that blueprints for utility-side business models are available, whereas customer-side business models are in an early stage of development. Applying the business model framework as an analytical tool, it is found that existing utility-side business models comprise a series of advantages for utilities in terms of revenue potential and risk avoidance. This study provides new insights about why utilities will favor utility-side business models over customer-side business models and why they also should engage in customer-side business models in their quest for more sustainable future business models.

KW - Sustainability sciences, Management & Economics

KW - Analytical tool

KW - Business models

KW - Electric power sector

KW - Energy landscape

KW - Large project

KW - Renewable energies

KW - Revenue potential

KW - Risk avoidance

KW - Sustainable energy

KW - value creation

KW - Energy research

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84858410111&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.rser.2012.01.072

DO - 10.1016/j.rser.2012.01.072

M3 - Scientific review articles

VL - 16

SP - 2483

EP - 2493

JO - Renewable & Sustainble Energy Reviews

JF - Renewable & Sustainble Energy Reviews

SN - 1364-0321

IS - 5

ER -

Recently viewed

Publications

  1. Maritime strategies of rising powers
  2. Discovering Workscapes
  3. Sustainable Value Added
  4. Examining the quality of the ‘Healthy Eating and Physical Activity in Schools’ (HEPS) quality checklist
  5. ‘You can't be green if you're in the red’
  6. Affective events and proactivity
  7. Foreign language learning in multilingual Germany
  8. Business Ideologies and Perceived Breach of Contract During Downsizing
  9. Organic Synthesis – Art or Science?
  10. Nachhaltige Entwicklung
  11. Datenschutz als Werkzeug zur Antidiskriminierung
  12. Foundations of Management & Entrepreneurship
  13. Mirror Writing
  14. An Asia-centric approach to team innovation
  15. Interactive Sustainability Reporting
  16. Do unbiased people act more rationally? - The case of comparative realism and vaccine intention
  17. Generative Probleme als transzendentaler Leitfaden?
  18. Modernization, cultural change, and democracy
  19. Notting Hill Gate 4
  20. Recommended classification and nomenclature of lunar highland rocks - A committee report
  21. Equivalence scales based on revealed preference consumption expenditures - the case of Germany
  22. Mentoring in schulischen Praxisphasen
  23. Ein unwetter in Jerusalem
  24. ‘We are all herd animals'
  25. ephemera: theory & politics in organization
  26. The role of space in the emergence and endurance of organizing: How independent workers and material assemblages constitute organizations
  27. Zur Wiederentdeckung des Körpers - die Feldenkraismethode
  28. Increased materiality judgments in financial accounting and external audit
  29. Analyzing social interactions
  30. Od Pacmana do Lary Croft. Jak badać postać w grach wideo?
  31. Art, Aesthetics and Organization