The Too-Much-Mimicry Effect: Strong (vs. Subtle) Mimicry Impairs Liking and Trust in Distributive Negotiations

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Standard

The Too-Much-Mimicry Effect: Strong (vs. Subtle) Mimicry Impairs Liking and Trust in Distributive Negotiations. / Wessler, Janet; Loschelder, David D.; Fendel, Johannes C. et al.
In: Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, Vol. 48, No. 2, 06.2024, p. 253-276.

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{a8455cbaf0204bc4b3b1d8d4c847a63a,
title = "The Too-Much-Mimicry Effect: Strong (vs. Subtle) Mimicry Impairs Liking and Trust in Distributive Negotiations",
abstract = "We examined whether mimicking an interaction partner is universally advantageous or, provided the mimicry is particularly strong, whether it has detrimental impacts on interpersonal and negotiation outcomes. Participants interacted with a confederate who engaged in no, subtle, or strong mimicry and then negotiated. In laboratory Experiment 1 (N = 71) and Experiment 2 (N = 149), subtly (vs. not) mimicked participants liked the confederate more, while strongly (vs. subtly) mimicked participants liked and trusted less. In Experiment 2, strongly (vs. subtly) mimicked participants were less susceptible to the first-offer anchor. The online Experiment 3 (N = 180) corroborated the too-much-mimicry effect: When participants became aware of mimicry, it exerted detrimental effects on liking and trust irrespective of the experimental condition. Experiment 1 and Experiment 3 found no too-much-mimicry effect on anchoring susceptibility. These findings show that (a) sufficiently subtle mimicry positively influences interpersonal outcomes and (b) too much mimicry backfires.",
keywords = "Anchor effect, Mimicry, Negotiation, Nonverbal communication, Business psychology",
author = "Janet Wessler and Loschelder, {David D.} and Fendel, {Johannes C.} and Malte Friese",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} The Author(s) 2023.",
year = "2024",
month = jun,
doi = "10.1007/s10919-023-00446-5",
language = "English",
volume = "48",
pages = "253--276",
journal = "Journal of Nonverbal Behavior",
issn = "0191-5886",
publisher = "Kluwer Academic/Human Sciences Press Inc.",
number = "2",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Too-Much-Mimicry Effect

T2 - Strong (vs. Subtle) Mimicry Impairs Liking and Trust in Distributive Negotiations

AU - Wessler, Janet

AU - Loschelder, David D.

AU - Fendel, Johannes C.

AU - Friese, Malte

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © The Author(s) 2023.

PY - 2024/6

Y1 - 2024/6

N2 - We examined whether mimicking an interaction partner is universally advantageous or, provided the mimicry is particularly strong, whether it has detrimental impacts on interpersonal and negotiation outcomes. Participants interacted with a confederate who engaged in no, subtle, or strong mimicry and then negotiated. In laboratory Experiment 1 (N = 71) and Experiment 2 (N = 149), subtly (vs. not) mimicked participants liked the confederate more, while strongly (vs. subtly) mimicked participants liked and trusted less. In Experiment 2, strongly (vs. subtly) mimicked participants were less susceptible to the first-offer anchor. The online Experiment 3 (N = 180) corroborated the too-much-mimicry effect: When participants became aware of mimicry, it exerted detrimental effects on liking and trust irrespective of the experimental condition. Experiment 1 and Experiment 3 found no too-much-mimicry effect on anchoring susceptibility. These findings show that (a) sufficiently subtle mimicry positively influences interpersonal outcomes and (b) too much mimicry backfires.

AB - We examined whether mimicking an interaction partner is universally advantageous or, provided the mimicry is particularly strong, whether it has detrimental impacts on interpersonal and negotiation outcomes. Participants interacted with a confederate who engaged in no, subtle, or strong mimicry and then negotiated. In laboratory Experiment 1 (N = 71) and Experiment 2 (N = 149), subtly (vs. not) mimicked participants liked the confederate more, while strongly (vs. subtly) mimicked participants liked and trusted less. In Experiment 2, strongly (vs. subtly) mimicked participants were less susceptible to the first-offer anchor. The online Experiment 3 (N = 180) corroborated the too-much-mimicry effect: When participants became aware of mimicry, it exerted detrimental effects on liking and trust irrespective of the experimental condition. Experiment 1 and Experiment 3 found no too-much-mimicry effect on anchoring susceptibility. These findings show that (a) sufficiently subtle mimicry positively influences interpersonal outcomes and (b) too much mimicry backfires.

KW - Anchor effect

KW - Mimicry

KW - Negotiation

KW - Nonverbal communication

KW - Business psychology

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85177564634&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/f25e5e67-ddab-3f51-8741-2699dac514db/

U2 - 10.1007/s10919-023-00446-5

DO - 10.1007/s10919-023-00446-5

M3 - Journal articles

AN - SCOPUS:85177564634

VL - 48

SP - 253

EP - 276

JO - Journal of Nonverbal Behavior

JF - Journal of Nonverbal Behavior

SN - 0191-5886

IS - 2

ER -

Recently viewed

Researchers

  1. Kerstin Nolte

Publications

  1. Current Trends in Environmental Cost Accounting - and its Interaction with Eco-Efficiency Performance Measurement and Indicators
  2. A Dual Kalman Filter to Identify Parameters of a Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motor
  3. Terminologien/Semantik
  4. The unadaptable fellow
  5. Understanding european union law
  6. Legal aspects of satellite-based earth observation
  7. Sustainable Redevelopment of Real Estate Properties and Its Social Impact
  8. High-Load Squat Training Improves Sprinting Performance in Junior Elite-Level Soccer Players: A Critically Appraised Topic.
  9. Materialitäten der Kindheit
  10. Beschreibungsmethodik für AAL-Integrationsprofile
  11. Implementation intentions and the willful pursuit of prosocial goals in negotiations
  12. The complementarity of single-species and ecosystem-oriented research in conservation research
  13. Working time dimensions and well-being
  14. Evidence-Based Entrepreneurship
  15. Schelling's Naturalism
  16. Panel Cointegration Testing in the Presence of a Time Trend
  17. The recent double paradigm shift in restoration ecology
  18. Tier
  19. A holistic approach to expatriate management
  20. Ästhetische Bildung der Differenz
  21. Context, contexts and appropriateness
  22. The structure of contributing factors of human error in safety-critical industries
  23. ... address unknown?
  24. SOFTWARE - SOUND-Spiele.
  25. Unobtrusive Detection of Respiratory Rate through UWB-Sensing for Applications of Ambient Assisted Living
  26. Harmful interference and human rights
  27. Pelvis and hips
  28. Sowing density
  29. Associations between the financial and industry expertise of audit committee members and Key Audit Matters within related audit reports
  30. The Settlement of EEZ Fisheries Access Disputes under UNCLOS
  31. Single, Double and Quadruple Maximum Power Point Trackers for a Stand-Alone Photovoltaic System
  32. Tourists’ Weather Perceptions and Weather Related Behavior
  33. The parrot knew everything
  34. Expatriate Management
  35. Adaptation and validation of the Digital Health Literacy Instrument for Portuguese university students
  36. Hacking Crowdfunding
  37. One voice, one message, but conflicting goals

Press / Media

  1. Weihnachtsfeiern