1. //
  2. Start
  3. //
  4. Publikationen
  5. The Too-Much-Mimicry Effect
  6. Formate
  7. //

The Too-Much-Mimicry Effect: Strong (vs. Subtle) Mimicry Impairs Liking and Trust in Distributive Negotiations

Publikation: Beiträge in Zeitschriften › Zeitschriftenaufsätze › Forschung › begutachtet

Standard

The Too-Much-Mimicry Effect: Strong (vs. Subtle) Mimicry Impairs Liking and Trust in Distributive Negotiations. / Wessler, Janet; Loschelder, David D.; Fendel, Johannes C. et al.
in: Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, Jahrgang 48, Nr. 2, 06.2024, S. 253-276.

Publikation: Beiträge in Zeitschriften › Zeitschriftenaufsätze › Forschung › begutachtet

Harvard

Wessler, J, Loschelder, DD, Fendel, JC & Friese, M 2024, 'The Too-Much-Mimicry Effect: Strong (vs. Subtle) Mimicry Impairs Liking and Trust in Distributive Negotiations', Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, Jg. 48, Nr. 2, S. 253-276. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10919-023-00446-5

APA

Wessler, J., Loschelder, D. D., Fendel, J. C., & Friese, M. (2024). The Too-Much-Mimicry Effect: Strong (vs. Subtle) Mimicry Impairs Liking and Trust in Distributive Negotiations. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 48(2), 253-276. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10919-023-00446-5

Vancouver

Wessler J, Loschelder DD, Fendel JC, Friese M. The Too-Much-Mimicry Effect: Strong (vs. Subtle) Mimicry Impairs Liking and Trust in Distributive Negotiations. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior. 2024 Jun;48(2):253-276. doi: 10.1007/s10919-023-00446-5

Bibtex

@article{a8455cbaf0204bc4b3b1d8d4c847a63a,
title = "The Too-Much-Mimicry Effect: Strong (vs. Subtle) Mimicry Impairs Liking and Trust in Distributive Negotiations",
abstract = "We examined whether mimicking an interaction partner is universally advantageous or, provided the mimicry is particularly strong, whether it has detrimental impacts on interpersonal and negotiation outcomes. Participants interacted with a confederate who engaged in no, subtle, or strong mimicry and then negotiated. In laboratory Experiment 1 (N = 71) and Experiment 2 (N = 149), subtly (vs. not) mimicked participants liked the confederate more, while strongly (vs. subtly) mimicked participants liked and trusted less. In Experiment 2, strongly (vs. subtly) mimicked participants were less susceptible to the first-offer anchor. The online Experiment 3 (N = 180) corroborated the too-much-mimicry effect: When participants became aware of mimicry, it exerted detrimental effects on liking and trust irrespective of the experimental condition. Experiment 1 and Experiment 3 found no too-much-mimicry effect on anchoring susceptibility. These findings show that (a) sufficiently subtle mimicry positively influences interpersonal outcomes and (b) too much mimicry backfires.",
keywords = "Anchor effect, Mimicry, Negotiation, Nonverbal communication, Business psychology",
author = "Janet Wessler and Loschelder, {David D.} and Fendel, {Johannes C.} and Malte Friese",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} The Author(s) 2023.",
year = "2024",
month = jun,
doi = "10.1007/s10919-023-00446-5",
language = "English",
volume = "48",
pages = "253--276",
journal = "Journal of Nonverbal Behavior",
issn = "0191-5886",
publisher = "Kluwer Academic/Human Sciences Press Inc.",
number = "2",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Too-Much-Mimicry Effect

T2 - Strong (vs. Subtle) Mimicry Impairs Liking and Trust in Distributive Negotiations

AU - Wessler, Janet

AU - Loschelder, David D.

AU - Fendel, Johannes C.

AU - Friese, Malte

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © The Author(s) 2023.

PY - 2024/6

Y1 - 2024/6

N2 - We examined whether mimicking an interaction partner is universally advantageous or, provided the mimicry is particularly strong, whether it has detrimental impacts on interpersonal and negotiation outcomes. Participants interacted with a confederate who engaged in no, subtle, or strong mimicry and then negotiated. In laboratory Experiment 1 (N = 71) and Experiment 2 (N = 149), subtly (vs. not) mimicked participants liked the confederate more, while strongly (vs. subtly) mimicked participants liked and trusted less. In Experiment 2, strongly (vs. subtly) mimicked participants were less susceptible to the first-offer anchor. The online Experiment 3 (N = 180) corroborated the too-much-mimicry effect: When participants became aware of mimicry, it exerted detrimental effects on liking and trust irrespective of the experimental condition. Experiment 1 and Experiment 3 found no too-much-mimicry effect on anchoring susceptibility. These findings show that (a) sufficiently subtle mimicry positively influences interpersonal outcomes and (b) too much mimicry backfires.

AB - We examined whether mimicking an interaction partner is universally advantageous or, provided the mimicry is particularly strong, whether it has detrimental impacts on interpersonal and negotiation outcomes. Participants interacted with a confederate who engaged in no, subtle, or strong mimicry and then negotiated. In laboratory Experiment 1 (N = 71) and Experiment 2 (N = 149), subtly (vs. not) mimicked participants liked the confederate more, while strongly (vs. subtly) mimicked participants liked and trusted less. In Experiment 2, strongly (vs. subtly) mimicked participants were less susceptible to the first-offer anchor. The online Experiment 3 (N = 180) corroborated the too-much-mimicry effect: When participants became aware of mimicry, it exerted detrimental effects on liking and trust irrespective of the experimental condition. Experiment 1 and Experiment 3 found no too-much-mimicry effect on anchoring susceptibility. These findings show that (a) sufficiently subtle mimicry positively influences interpersonal outcomes and (b) too much mimicry backfires.

KW - Anchor effect

KW - Mimicry

KW - Negotiation

KW - Nonverbal communication

KW - Business psychology

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85177564634&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/f25e5e67-ddab-3f51-8741-2699dac514db/

U2 - 10.1007/s10919-023-00446-5

DO - 10.1007/s10919-023-00446-5

M3 - Journal articles

AN - SCOPUS:85177564634

VL - 48

SP - 253

EP - 276

JO - Journal of Nonverbal Behavior

JF - Journal of Nonverbal Behavior

SN - 0191-5886

IS - 2

ER -

In der gleichen Zeitschrift

Imagining is Not Observing: The Role of Simulation Processes Within the Mimicry-Liking Expressway

Kulesza, W., Chrobot, N., Dolinski, D., Muniak, P., Bińkowska, D., Grzyb, T. & Genschow, O., 01.09.2022, in: Journal of Nonverbal Behavior. 46, 3, S. 233-246 14 S.

Publikation: Beiträge in Zeitschriften › Zeitschriftenaufsätze › Forschung › begutachtet

Weitere Publikationen dieser Person(en)

Self-Control Following Prior Exertion: An Empirical Test of the Motivational Shift and Compensatory Effort Hypotheses

Mlynski, C., Roth, L., Loschelder, D. D., Gieseler, K., Job, V. & Friese, M., 30.01.2025, in: Collabra: Psychology. 11, 1, 14 S., 128616.

Publikation: Beiträge in Zeitschriften › Zeitschriftenaufsätze › Forschung › begutachtet

Addressing climate change with behavioral science: A global intervention tournament in 63 countries

Vlasceanu, M., Doell, K. C., Bak-Coleman, J. B., Todorova, B., Berkebile-Weinberg, M. M., Grayson, S. J., Patel, Y., Goldwert, D., Pei, Y., Chakroff, A., Pronizius, E., Broek, K. L. V. D., Vlasceanu, D., Constantino, S., Morais, M. J., Schumann, P., Rathje, S., Fang, K., Aglioti, S. M., Alfano, M., Alvarado-Yepez, A. J., Andersen, A., Anseel, F., Apps, M. A. J., Asadli, C., Awuor, F. J., Azevedo, F., Basaglia, P., Bélanger, J. J., Berger, S., Bertin, P., Białek, M., Bialobrzeska, O., Blaya-Burgo, M., Bleize, D. N. M., Bø, S., Boecker, L., Boggio, P. S., Borau, S., Bos, B., Bouguettaya, A., Brauer, M., Brick, C., Brik, T., Briker, R., Brosch, T., Buchel, O., Buonauro, D., Butalia, R., Carvacho, H., Chamberlain, S. A. E., Chan, H.-Y., Chow, D., Chung, D., Cian, L., Cohen-Eick, N., Contreras-Huerta, L. S., Contu, D., Cristea, V., Cutler, J., D'Ottone, S., Keersmaecker, J. D., Delcourt, S., Delouvée, S., Diel, K., Douglas, B. D., Drupp, M. A., Dubey, S., Ekmanis, J., Elbaek, C. T., Elsherif, M., Engelhard, I. M., Escher, Y. A., Etienne, T. W., Farage, L., Farias, A. R., Feuerriegel, S., Findor, A., Freira, L., Friese, M., Gains, N. P., Gallyamova, A., Geiger, S. J., Genschow, O., Gjoneska, B., Gkinopoulos, T., Goldberg, B., Goldenberg, A., Gradidge, S., Grassini, S., Gray, K., Grelle, S., Griffin, S. M., Grigoryan, L., Grigoryan, A., Grigoryev, D., Gruber, J., Guilaran, J., Hadar, B., Hahnel, U. J. J., Halperin, E., Harvey, A. J., Haugestad, C. A. P., Herman, A. M., Hershfield, H. E., Himichi, T., Hine, D. W., Hofmann, W., Howe, L., Huaman-Chulluncuy, E. T., Huang, G., Ishii, T., Ito, A., Jia, F., Jost, J. T., Jovanović, V., Jurgiel, D., Kácha, O., Kankaanpää, R., Kantorowicz, J., Kantorowicz-Reznichenko, E., Mintz, K. K., Kaya, I., Kaya, O., Khachatryan, N., Klas, A., Klein, C., Klöckner, C. A., Koppel, L., Kosachenko, A. I., Kothe, E. J., Krebs, R., Krosch, A. R., Krouwel, A. P. M., Kyrychenko, Y., Lagomarsino, M., Lamm, C., Lange, F., Cunningham, J. L., Lees, J., Leung, T. Y., Levy, N., Lockwood, P. L., Longoni, C., Ortega, A. L., Loschelder, D. D., Lu, J. G., Luo, Y., Luomba, J., Lutz, A. E., Majer, J. M., Markowitz, E., Marsh, A. A., Mascarenhas, K. L., Mbilingi, B., Mbungu, W., McHugh, C., Meijers, M. H. C., Mercier, H., Mhagama, F. L., Michalakis, K., Mikus, N., Milliron, S., Mitkidis, P., Monge-Rodríguez, F. S., Mora, Y. L., Moreau, D., Motoki, K., Moyano, M., Mus, M., Navajas, J., Nguyen, T. L., Nguyen, D. M., Nguyen, T., Niemi, L., Nijssen, S. R. R., Nilsonne, G., Nitschke, J. P., Nockur, L., Okura, R., Öner, S., Özdoğru, A. A., Palumbo, H., Panagopoulos, C., Panasiti, M. S., Pärnamets, P., Paruzel-Czachura, M., Pavlov, Y. G., Payán-Gómez, C., Pearson, A. R., Costa, L. P. D., Petrowsky, H. M., Pfattheicher, S., Pham, N. T., Ponizovskiy, V., Pretus, C., Rêgo, G. G., Reimann, R., Rhoads, S. A., Riano-Moreno, J., Richter, I., Röer, J. P., Rosa-Sullivan, J., Ross, R. M., Sabherwal, A., Saito, T., Sarrasin, O., Say, N., Schmid, K., Schmitt, M. T., Schoenegger, P., Scholz, C., Schug, M. G., Schulreich, S., Shreedhar, G., Shuman, E., Sivan, S., Sjåstad, H., Soliman, M., Soud, K., Spampatti, T., Sparkman, G., Spasovski, O., Stanley, S. K., Stern, J. A., Strahm, N., Suko, Y., Sul, S., Syropoulos, S., Taylor, N. C., Tedaldi, E., Tinghög, G., Huynh, L. D. T., Travaglino, G. A., Tsakiris, M., Tüter, İ., Tyrala, M., Uluğ, Ö. M., Urbanek, A., Valko, D., Linden, S. V. D., Schie, K. V., Stekelenburg, A. V., Vanags, E., Västfjäll, D., Vesely, S., Vintr, J., Vranka, M., Wanguche, P. O., Willer, R., Wojcik, A. D., Xu, R., Yadav, A., Zawisza, M., Zhao, X., Zhao, J., Żuk, D. & Bavel, J. J. V., 09.02.2024, in: Science Advances. 10, 6, 19 S., eadj5778.

Publikation: Beiträge in Zeitschriften › Zeitschriftenaufsätze › Forschung › begutachtet

Defeminizing Sustainability: How to Boost Men’s Motivation for Proenvironmental Behavior

Hällfritzsch, M., Volpi, L., Daniel, K. G., Somogyi, C., Kause, A., Reese, G. & Loschelder, D. D., 2024, (Elektronische Veröffentlichung vor Drucklegung) in: Motivation Science.

Publikation: Beiträge in Zeitschriften › Zeitschriftenaufsätze › Forschung › begutachtet

Empowered or informed? Seeking to mitigate gender differences in first-offer assertiveness through pre-negotiation interventions

Kokić, E., Wagner, L., García López del Amo, A., Giering, C. L., Ly Truong, V., Petrowsky, H. M., Husen, O. M. & Loschelder, D. D., 01.12.2024, in: Journal of Economic Psychology. 105, 11 S., 102775.

Publikation: Beiträge in Zeitschriften › Zeitschriftenaufsätze › Forschung › begutachtet

Gender differences in sex drive: Reply to Conley and Yang (2024)

Frankenbach, J., Weber, M., Loschelder, D. D., Kilger, H. & Friese, M., 01.08.2024, in: Psychological Bulletin. 150, 8, S. 1011-1019 9 S.

Publikation: Beiträge in Zeitschriften › Zeitschriftenaufsätze › Forschung › begutachtet

DOI

Zuletzt angesehen

Publikationen

  1. Product diversification and stability of employment and sales
  2. Dynamische Modellierung der Sorption von Substanzen in einem hydrologischen Einzugsgebietsmodell anhand des Beispiels Phosphor
  3. Macroeconomic shocks and banks’ foreign assets
  4. Improving compliance with COVID-19 guidance
  5. Predicting expatriate job performance
  6. Alcohol intake can reduce gambling behavior
  7. Statistical Learning and Inference Is Impaired in the Nonclinical Continuum of Psychosis
  8. Schulbezogenes mathematisches Vorwissen von Bewerber*innen auf ein Mathematik-Lehramtsstudium
  9. Plastics in our ocean as transdisciplinary challenge
  10. Investigation On The Influence Of Remanufacturing On Production Planning And Control – A Systematic Literature Review
  11. Stock price reactions to climate science information from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change
  12. Effects of elevated atmospheric CO2 concentrations on barley, sugar beet and wheat in a rotation
  13. Toward “hardened” accountability?
  14. New evidence for vegetation development and timing of Upper Middle Pleistocene interglacials in Northern Germany and tentative correlations
  15. Intermetallic phase characteristics in the Mg–Nd–Zn system
  16. Does Internet-based guided self-help for depression cause harm?
  17. Print exposure across the reading life span
  18. Reaching for the (Product) Stars
  19. Influence of cerium on stress corrosion cracking in AZ91D
  20. Elution of Monomers from Two Conventional Dental Composite Materials
  21. Effects of introspective vs. extraspective instruction in scaling of hedonic properties of flavouring ingredients by Chinese and German subjects
  22. Simulation of the quench sensitivity of the aluminum alloy 6082
  23. Generalising IRT to Discriminate Between Examinees
  24. Systematic study of the effect of non-uniform seal stiffness on the contact stress in flat-faced soft-seated spring operated pressure relief valves
  25. Accurate welding line prediction in extrusion processes
  26. Photochemistry of 2,2', 4,4', %,5'-hexabde (BDE-153) in THF and adsorbed on SiO2
  27. Cues from Facial Expressions for Emotional Interfaces
  28. Manufacture of profiles with variable cross-sections, curvatures and twistings by influencing the material flow in hot extrusion
  29. Effects of habitat heterogeneity on bird communities in forests of northeastern Germany
  30. The multipole resonance probe
  31. German multiple-product, multiple-destination exporters: Bernard-Redding-Schott under test
  32. Forestry contributed to warming of forest ecosystems in northern Germany during the extreme summers of 2018 and 2019
  33. In Situ Synchrotron Radiation Study of the Tension–Compression Asymmetry in an Extruded Mg–2Y–1Zn–1Mn Alloy
  34. Entrepreneurial Traits and Strategy in the Performance of Owner-manager Led Firms
  35. Beyond Personalization and Anonymity:
  36. The effect of hunting regimes on tree regeneration in lowland beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) forests
  37. „Willst du wirklich ,lehren‘ oder ,Lehrer werden‘?“