The exact determination of subjective risk and comfort thresholds in car following
Research output: Journal contributions › Journal articles › Research › peer-review
Standard
In: Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, Vol. 46, No. A, 01.04.2017, p. 1-13.
Research output: Journal contributions › Journal articles › Research › peer-review
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - The exact determination of subjective risk and comfort thresholds in car following
AU - Siebert, Felix
AU - Oehl, Michael
AU - Bersch, Florian
AU - Pfister, Hans-Rüdiger
N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2017 Elsevier Ltd
PY - 2017/4/1
Y1 - 2017/4/1
N2 - In this study the location of vehicle to vehicle distance thresholds for self-reported subjective risk and comfort was researched. Participants were presented with ascending and descending time headway sequences in a driving simulator. This so called method of limits of ascending and descending stimuli (Gouy, Diels, Reed, Stevens, & Burnett, 2012) was refined to efficiently determine individual thresholds for stable time headways with a granularity of 0.1 s. Time headway thresholds were researched for 50, 100, and 150 km/h in a city, rural, and highway setting. Furthermore, thresholds for self-driving (level 0 automation: NHTSA, 2013) were compared with thresholds for the experience of subjective risk and comfort in assisted driving, similar to adaptive cruise control (level 1 automation). Results show that preferred individual time headways vary between subjects. Within subjects however, time headway thresholds do not significantly differ for different speeds. Furthermore we found that there was no significant difference between time headways of self-driving and distance-assisted driving. The relevance of these findings for the development of adaptive cruise control systems, autonomous driving and driver behavior modelling is discussed.
AB - In this study the location of vehicle to vehicle distance thresholds for self-reported subjective risk and comfort was researched. Participants were presented with ascending and descending time headway sequences in a driving simulator. This so called method of limits of ascending and descending stimuli (Gouy, Diels, Reed, Stevens, & Burnett, 2012) was refined to efficiently determine individual thresholds for stable time headways with a granularity of 0.1 s. Time headway thresholds were researched for 50, 100, and 150 km/h in a city, rural, and highway setting. Furthermore, thresholds for self-driving (level 0 automation: NHTSA, 2013) were compared with thresholds for the experience of subjective risk and comfort in assisted driving, similar to adaptive cruise control (level 1 automation). Results show that preferred individual time headways vary between subjects. Within subjects however, time headway thresholds do not significantly differ for different speeds. Furthermore we found that there was no significant difference between time headways of self-driving and distance-assisted driving. The relevance of these findings for the development of adaptive cruise control systems, autonomous driving and driver behavior modelling is discussed.
KW - Business psychology
KW - Time Headway
KW - Method of limits
KW - Driver behavior modeling
KW - Risk
KW - Comfort
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85012254427&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.trf.2017.01.001
DO - 10.1016/j.trf.2017.01.001
M3 - Journal articles
VL - 46
SP - 1
EP - 13
JO - Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour
JF - Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour
SN - 1369-8478
IS - A
ER -