Techno-economic analysis of a food waste valorization process via microalgae cultivation and co-production of plasticizer, lactic acid and animal feed from algal biomass and food waste

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Standard

Techno-economic analysis of a food waste valorization process via microalgae cultivation and co-production of plasticizer, lactic acid and animal feed from algal biomass and food waste. / Kwan, Tsz Him; Pleissner, Daniel; Lau, Kin Yan et al.
In: Bioresource Technology, Vol. 198, 01.12.2015, p. 292 - 299.

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{1c6af9de26b24f6283db36c3f9068258,
title = "Techno-economic analysis of a food waste valorization process via microalgae cultivation and co-production of plasticizer, lactic acid and animal feed from algal biomass and food waste",
abstract = "A techno-economic study of food waste valorization via fungal hydrolysis, microalgae cultivation and production of plasticizer, lactic acid and animal feed was simulated and evaluated by Super-Pro Designer{\textregistered}. A pilot-scale plant was designed with a capacity of 1 metric ton day−1 of food waste with 20 years lifetime. Two scenarios were proposed with different products: Scenario (I) plasticizer & lactic acid, Scenario (II) plasticizer & animal feed. It was found that only Scenario I was economically feasible. The annual net profits, net present value, payback period and internal rate of return were US$ 422,699, US$ 3,028,000, 7.56 years and 18.98%, respectively. Scenario II was not economic viable due to a deficit of US$ 42,632 per year. Sensitivity analysis showed that the price of lactic acid was the largest determinant of the profitability in Scenario I, while the impact of the variables was very close in Scenario II.",
keywords = "Food waste valorization, Microalgae, Plasticizer, Lactic acid, Animal feed, Biology, Chemistry",
author = "Kwan, {Tsz Him} and Daniel Pleissner and Lau, {Kin Yan} and Joachim Venus and Aude Pommeret and Lin, {Carol Sze Ki}",
year = "2015",
month = dec,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.biortech.2015.09.003",
language = "English",
volume = "198",
pages = "292 -- 299",
journal = "Bioresource Technology",
issn = "0960-8524",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Techno-economic analysis of a food waste valorization process via microalgae cultivation and co-production of plasticizer, lactic acid and animal feed from algal biomass and food waste

AU - Kwan, Tsz Him

AU - Pleissner, Daniel

AU - Lau, Kin Yan

AU - Venus, Joachim

AU - Pommeret, Aude

AU - Lin, Carol Sze Ki

PY - 2015/12/1

Y1 - 2015/12/1

N2 - A techno-economic study of food waste valorization via fungal hydrolysis, microalgae cultivation and production of plasticizer, lactic acid and animal feed was simulated and evaluated by Super-Pro Designer®. A pilot-scale plant was designed with a capacity of 1 metric ton day−1 of food waste with 20 years lifetime. Two scenarios were proposed with different products: Scenario (I) plasticizer & lactic acid, Scenario (II) plasticizer & animal feed. It was found that only Scenario I was economically feasible. The annual net profits, net present value, payback period and internal rate of return were US$ 422,699, US$ 3,028,000, 7.56 years and 18.98%, respectively. Scenario II was not economic viable due to a deficit of US$ 42,632 per year. Sensitivity analysis showed that the price of lactic acid was the largest determinant of the profitability in Scenario I, while the impact of the variables was very close in Scenario II.

AB - A techno-economic study of food waste valorization via fungal hydrolysis, microalgae cultivation and production of plasticizer, lactic acid and animal feed was simulated and evaluated by Super-Pro Designer®. A pilot-scale plant was designed with a capacity of 1 metric ton day−1 of food waste with 20 years lifetime. Two scenarios were proposed with different products: Scenario (I) plasticizer & lactic acid, Scenario (II) plasticizer & animal feed. It was found that only Scenario I was economically feasible. The annual net profits, net present value, payback period and internal rate of return were US$ 422,699, US$ 3,028,000, 7.56 years and 18.98%, respectively. Scenario II was not economic viable due to a deficit of US$ 42,632 per year. Sensitivity analysis showed that the price of lactic acid was the largest determinant of the profitability in Scenario I, while the impact of the variables was very close in Scenario II.

KW - Food waste valorization

KW - Microalgae

KW - Plasticizer

KW - Lactic acid

KW - Animal feed

KW - Biology

KW - Chemistry

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84942280166&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.biortech.2015.09.003

DO - 10.1016/j.biortech.2015.09.003

M3 - Journal articles

C2 - 26402872

VL - 198

SP - 292

EP - 299

JO - Bioresource Technology

JF - Bioresource Technology

SN - 0960-8524

ER -