Taming a Wicked Problem: Resolving Controversies in Biodiversity Offsetting

Research output: Journal contributionsScientific review articlesResearch

Standard

Taming a Wicked Problem : Resolving Controversies in Biodiversity Offsetting. / Maron, Martine; Ives, Christopher D.; Kujala, Heini et al.

In: BioScience, Vol. 66, No. 6, 01.06.2016, p. 489-498.

Research output: Journal contributionsScientific review articlesResearch

Harvard

Maron, M, Ives, CD, Kujala, H, Bull, JW, Maseyk, FJF, Bekessy, S, Gordon, A, Watson, JEM, Lentini, PE, Gibbons, P, Possingham, HP, Hobbs, RJ, Keith, DA, Wintle, BA & Evans, MC 2016, 'Taming a Wicked Problem: Resolving Controversies in Biodiversity Offsetting', BioScience, vol. 66, no. 6, pp. 489-498. https://doi.org/10.1093/biosci/biw038

APA

Maron, M., Ives, C. D., Kujala, H., Bull, J. W., Maseyk, F. J. F., Bekessy, S., Gordon, A., Watson, J. E. M., Lentini, P. E., Gibbons, P., Possingham, H. P., Hobbs, R. J., Keith, D. A., Wintle, B. A., & Evans, M. C. (2016). Taming a Wicked Problem: Resolving Controversies in Biodiversity Offsetting. BioScience, 66(6), 489-498. https://doi.org/10.1093/biosci/biw038

Vancouver

Maron M, Ives CD, Kujala H, Bull JW, Maseyk FJF, Bekessy S et al. Taming a Wicked Problem: Resolving Controversies in Biodiversity Offsetting. BioScience. 2016 Jun 1;66(6):489-498. doi: 10.1093/biosci/biw038

Bibtex

@article{df153c7946b846f7b1f3ab66bbc5f1b7,
title = "Taming a Wicked Problem: Resolving Controversies in Biodiversity Offsetting",
abstract = "The rising popularity of biodiversity offsetting as a tool for balancing biodiversity losses from development with equivalent gains elsewhere has sparked debate on many fronts. The fundamental questions are the following: Is offsetting good, bad, or at least better than the status quo for biodiversity conservation outcomes, and what do we need to know to decide? We present a concise synthesis of the most contentious issues related to biodiversity offsetting, categorized as ethical, social, technical, or governance challenges. In each case, we discuss avenues for reducing disagreement over these issues and identify those that are likely to remain unresolved. We argue that there are many risks associated with the unscrutinized expansion of offset policy. Nevertheless, governments are increasingly adopting offset policies, so working rapidly to clarify and-where possible-to resolve these issues is essential.",
keywords = "biodiversity offsets, conservation policy, environmental ethics, environmental governance, no net loss, Biology",
author = "Martine Maron and Ives, {Christopher D.} and Heini Kujala and Bull, {Joseph W.} and Maseyk, {Fleur J.F.} and Sarah Bekessy and Ascelin Gordon and Watson, {James E.M.} and Lentini, {Pia E.} and Philip Gibbons and Possingham, {Hugh P.} and Hobbs, {Richard J.} and Keith, {David A.} and Wintle, {Brendan A.} and Evans, {Megan C.}",
note = "Horizon 2020 Framework Programme (H2020) Funding Number: 655497",
year = "2016",
month = jun,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1093/biosci/biw038",
language = "English",
volume = "66",
pages = "489--498",
journal = "BioScience",
issn = "0006-3568",
publisher = "University of California Press",
number = "6",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Taming a Wicked Problem

T2 - Resolving Controversies in Biodiversity Offsetting

AU - Maron, Martine

AU - Ives, Christopher D.

AU - Kujala, Heini

AU - Bull, Joseph W.

AU - Maseyk, Fleur J.F.

AU - Bekessy, Sarah

AU - Gordon, Ascelin

AU - Watson, James E.M.

AU - Lentini, Pia E.

AU - Gibbons, Philip

AU - Possingham, Hugh P.

AU - Hobbs, Richard J.

AU - Keith, David A.

AU - Wintle, Brendan A.

AU - Evans, Megan C.

N1 - Horizon 2020 Framework Programme (H2020) Funding Number: 655497

PY - 2016/6/1

Y1 - 2016/6/1

N2 - The rising popularity of biodiversity offsetting as a tool for balancing biodiversity losses from development with equivalent gains elsewhere has sparked debate on many fronts. The fundamental questions are the following: Is offsetting good, bad, or at least better than the status quo for biodiversity conservation outcomes, and what do we need to know to decide? We present a concise synthesis of the most contentious issues related to biodiversity offsetting, categorized as ethical, social, technical, or governance challenges. In each case, we discuss avenues for reducing disagreement over these issues and identify those that are likely to remain unresolved. We argue that there are many risks associated with the unscrutinized expansion of offset policy. Nevertheless, governments are increasingly adopting offset policies, so working rapidly to clarify and-where possible-to resolve these issues is essential.

AB - The rising popularity of biodiversity offsetting as a tool for balancing biodiversity losses from development with equivalent gains elsewhere has sparked debate on many fronts. The fundamental questions are the following: Is offsetting good, bad, or at least better than the status quo for biodiversity conservation outcomes, and what do we need to know to decide? We present a concise synthesis of the most contentious issues related to biodiversity offsetting, categorized as ethical, social, technical, or governance challenges. In each case, we discuss avenues for reducing disagreement over these issues and identify those that are likely to remain unresolved. We argue that there are many risks associated with the unscrutinized expansion of offset policy. Nevertheless, governments are increasingly adopting offset policies, so working rapidly to clarify and-where possible-to resolve these issues is essential.

KW - biodiversity offsets

KW - conservation policy

KW - environmental ethics

KW - environmental governance

KW - no net loss

KW - Biology

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84975780353&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/068cc636-e4e0-3df9-a6f6-45f50571b4d1/

U2 - 10.1093/biosci/biw038

DO - 10.1093/biosci/biw038

M3 - Scientific review articles

AN - SCOPUS:84975780353

VL - 66

SP - 489

EP - 498

JO - BioScience

JF - BioScience

SN - 0006-3568

IS - 6

ER -

DOI