Sex Drive: Theoretical Conceptualization and Meta-Analytic Review of Gender Differences
Research output: Journal contributions › Journal articles › Research › peer-review
Standard
In: Psychological Bulletin, Vol. 148, No. 9-10, 01.11.2022, p. 621-661.
Research output: Journal contributions › Journal articles › Research › peer-review
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Sex Drive
T2 - Theoretical Conceptualization and Meta-Analytic Review of Gender Differences
AU - Frankenbach, Julius
AU - Weber, Marcel
AU - Loschelder, David D.
AU - Kilger, Helena
AU - Friese, Malte
N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2022 American Psychological Association
PY - 2022/11/1
Y1 - 2022/11/1
N2 - Few spheres in life are as universally relevant for (almost) all individuals past puberty as sexuality. One important aspect of sexuality concerns individuals’ sex drive—their dispositional sexual motivation. A vigorous scientific (and popular) debate revolves around the question of whether or not there is a gender difference in sex drive. Several theories predict a higher sex drive in men compared to women, with some theories attributing this difference to biased responding rather than true differences. Currently, there is little consensus on how to conceptualize sex drive, nor does a quantitative summary of the literature exist. In this article, we present a theory-driven conceptualization of sex drive as the density distribution of state sex drive, where state sex drive is defined as momentary sexual motivation that manifests in sexual cognition, affect, and behavior. We conduct a comprehensive meta-analysis of gender differences in sex drive based on 211 studies, 856 effect sizes, and 621,463 persons. The meta-analysis revealed a stronger sex drive in men compared to women, with a medium-to-large effect size, g = 0.69, 95% CI [0.58, 0.81]. Men more often think and fantasize about sex, more often experience sexual affect like desire, and more often engage in masturbation than women. Adjustment for biased responding reduced the gender difference (g = 0.54). Moderation analyses suggest that the effect is robust and largely invariant to contextual factors. There was no evidence of publication bias.
AB - Few spheres in life are as universally relevant for (almost) all individuals past puberty as sexuality. One important aspect of sexuality concerns individuals’ sex drive—their dispositional sexual motivation. A vigorous scientific (and popular) debate revolves around the question of whether or not there is a gender difference in sex drive. Several theories predict a higher sex drive in men compared to women, with some theories attributing this difference to biased responding rather than true differences. Currently, there is little consensus on how to conceptualize sex drive, nor does a quantitative summary of the literature exist. In this article, we present a theory-driven conceptualization of sex drive as the density distribution of state sex drive, where state sex drive is defined as momentary sexual motivation that manifests in sexual cognition, affect, and behavior. We conduct a comprehensive meta-analysis of gender differences in sex drive based on 211 studies, 856 effect sizes, and 621,463 persons. The meta-analysis revealed a stronger sex drive in men compared to women, with a medium-to-large effect size, g = 0.69, 95% CI [0.58, 0.81]. Men more often think and fantasize about sex, more often experience sexual affect like desire, and more often engage in masturbation than women. Adjustment for biased responding reduced the gender difference (g = 0.54). Moderation analyses suggest that the effect is robust and largely invariant to contextual factors. There was no evidence of publication bias.
KW - Business psychology
KW - Individual differences
KW - Masturbation
KW - Sexual desire
KW - Sexual motivation
KW - Sexual thoughts
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85140767565&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/a5558bc7-2e0c-3ed9-b42f-f00f0dd123d3/
U2 - 10.1037/bul0000366
DO - 10.1037/bul0000366
M3 - Journal articles
C2 - 36227317
VL - 148
SP - 621
EP - 661
JO - Psychological Bulletin
JF - Psychological Bulletin
SN - 0033-2909
IS - 9-10
ER -