Scattered trees are keystone structures - Implications for conservation

Research output: Journal contributionsScientific review articlesResearch

Standard

Scattered trees are keystone structures - Implications for conservation. / Manning, Adrian D.; Fischer, Jörn; Lindenmayer, David B.
In: Biological Conservation, Vol. 132, No. 3, 01.10.2006, p. 311-321.

Research output: Journal contributionsScientific review articlesResearch

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Manning AD, Fischer J, Lindenmayer DB. Scattered trees are keystone structures - Implications for conservation. Biological Conservation. 2006 Oct 1;132(3):311-321. doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2006.04.023

Bibtex

@article{37c54137d36040cca75ac78c1951f851,
title = "Scattered trees are keystone structures - Implications for conservation",
abstract = "Scattered trees are prominent features in many landscapes worldwide, including natural landscapes, cultural landscapes, and recently modified landscapes. The ecological importance of scattered trees is widely acknowledged in natural landscapes, but has not been sufficiently appreciated in human-modified landscapes. This paper shows that scattered trees are keystone structures in a wide range of landscapes. At the local scale, ecological functions of scattered trees include: provision of a distinct microclimate; increased soil nutrients; increased plant species richness; increased structural complexity; and habitat for animals. At the landscape scale, ecological roles include: increased landscape-scale tree cover; increased connectivity for animals; increased genetic connectivity for tree populations; and provision of genetic material and focal points for future large-scale ecosystem restoration. Furthermore, in disturbed landscapes, scattered trees often are biological legacies that provide ecological continuity through time. In combination, these ecological functions support the argument that scattered trees are keystone structures. That is, their contribution to ecosystem functioning is disproportionately large given the small area occupied and low biomass of any given tree, and the low density of scattered trees collectively. Because scattered trees fulfill unique functional roles in a wide range of scattered tree ecosystems, their loss may result in undesirable ecological regime shifts. A key management challenge in all landscapes with scattered trees is to maintain a balance between recruitment and mortality of trees in an appropriate spatial pattern. Meeting this challenge may represent an important step towards the genuine integration of conservation and production in human-modified landscapes.",
keywords = "Biology, Biological legacies, Keystone structures, Isolated trees, Paddock trees, Wood-pasture, Regime shifts, Scattered trees",
author = "Manning, {Adrian D.} and J{\"o}rn Fischer and Lindenmayer, {David B.}",
note = "Times Cited: 81",
year = "2006",
month = oct,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.biocon.2006.04.023",
language = "English",
volume = "132",
pages = "311--321",
journal = "Biological Conservation",
issn = "0006-3207",
publisher = "Elsevier B.V.",
number = "3",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Scattered trees are keystone structures - Implications for conservation

AU - Manning, Adrian D.

AU - Fischer, Jörn

AU - Lindenmayer, David B.

N1 - Times Cited: 81

PY - 2006/10/1

Y1 - 2006/10/1

N2 - Scattered trees are prominent features in many landscapes worldwide, including natural landscapes, cultural landscapes, and recently modified landscapes. The ecological importance of scattered trees is widely acknowledged in natural landscapes, but has not been sufficiently appreciated in human-modified landscapes. This paper shows that scattered trees are keystone structures in a wide range of landscapes. At the local scale, ecological functions of scattered trees include: provision of a distinct microclimate; increased soil nutrients; increased plant species richness; increased structural complexity; and habitat for animals. At the landscape scale, ecological roles include: increased landscape-scale tree cover; increased connectivity for animals; increased genetic connectivity for tree populations; and provision of genetic material and focal points for future large-scale ecosystem restoration. Furthermore, in disturbed landscapes, scattered trees often are biological legacies that provide ecological continuity through time. In combination, these ecological functions support the argument that scattered trees are keystone structures. That is, their contribution to ecosystem functioning is disproportionately large given the small area occupied and low biomass of any given tree, and the low density of scattered trees collectively. Because scattered trees fulfill unique functional roles in a wide range of scattered tree ecosystems, their loss may result in undesirable ecological regime shifts. A key management challenge in all landscapes with scattered trees is to maintain a balance between recruitment and mortality of trees in an appropriate spatial pattern. Meeting this challenge may represent an important step towards the genuine integration of conservation and production in human-modified landscapes.

AB - Scattered trees are prominent features in many landscapes worldwide, including natural landscapes, cultural landscapes, and recently modified landscapes. The ecological importance of scattered trees is widely acknowledged in natural landscapes, but has not been sufficiently appreciated in human-modified landscapes. This paper shows that scattered trees are keystone structures in a wide range of landscapes. At the local scale, ecological functions of scattered trees include: provision of a distinct microclimate; increased soil nutrients; increased plant species richness; increased structural complexity; and habitat for animals. At the landscape scale, ecological roles include: increased landscape-scale tree cover; increased connectivity for animals; increased genetic connectivity for tree populations; and provision of genetic material and focal points for future large-scale ecosystem restoration. Furthermore, in disturbed landscapes, scattered trees often are biological legacies that provide ecological continuity through time. In combination, these ecological functions support the argument that scattered trees are keystone structures. That is, their contribution to ecosystem functioning is disproportionately large given the small area occupied and low biomass of any given tree, and the low density of scattered trees collectively. Because scattered trees fulfill unique functional roles in a wide range of scattered tree ecosystems, their loss may result in undesirable ecological regime shifts. A key management challenge in all landscapes with scattered trees is to maintain a balance between recruitment and mortality of trees in an appropriate spatial pattern. Meeting this challenge may represent an important step towards the genuine integration of conservation and production in human-modified landscapes.

KW - Biology

KW - Biological legacies

KW - Keystone structures

KW - Isolated trees

KW - Paddock trees

KW - Wood-pasture

KW - Regime shifts

KW - Scattered trees

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33745763421&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/0ba5e6ee-c36e-3ea8-8c97-840c8a0b690e/

U2 - 10.1016/j.biocon.2006.04.023

DO - 10.1016/j.biocon.2006.04.023

M3 - Scientific review articles

VL - 132

SP - 311

EP - 321

JO - Biological Conservation

JF - Biological Conservation

SN - 0006-3207

IS - 3

ER -

Recently viewed

Publications

  1. Accounting for Information Infrastructure as Medium for Organisational Change
  2. Contested future-making in containment: temporalities, infrastructures and agency
  3. Valuation Beyond the Market: On Symbolic and Economic Value in Contemporary Art
  4. Einfluss maschineller Pflegemaßnahmen auf die Nährstoffdynamik von Sandheiden
  5. Markttransparenz im CO2-Emissionshandel und Risikomanagement von Stromerzeugern
  6. Integrating rural development and biodiversity conservation in Central Romania
  7. Multiple Glacial Refugia of the Low-Dispersal Ground Beetle Carabus irregularis:
  8. Wie wirkt sich die externe Pflichtrotation auf den deutschen Prüfungsmarkt aus?
  9. Development and current criticism of asset impairment in German tax accounting
  10. Educating for Sustainable Consumption as a Response to the Global Water Crisis
  11. Beyond Urban Challenges-Virtual Reality Tools in Participatory Design Processes
  12. Historische Wissensordnungen, religiöses Wissen und die Grenzen der Sozialwelt
  13. Christlicher Glaube in ökumenischer Gemeinschaft von Kirchen und Konfessionen
  14. Alltägliche Unterrichtsplanung und -analyse in konstruktivistischer Perspektive
  15. Ökologische Bedeutung von Wildnisgebieten - das Beispiel Buchenwald-Ökosysteme
  16. Assessing the Sustainability Performance of Sustainability Management Software
  17. Was macht ein Buch zum Bestseller? Zum Geheimnis des Erfolgs von Charlotte Link.
  18. Brüchige Hermetik – Zu geschichtstheoretischen Figuren bei Spengler und Kittler
  19. Different responses of ant species to sugars and amino acids in a subtropical forest of China 
  20. Von der Internationalisierung der Hochschule zur transkulturellen Wissenschaft
  21. Use Cases for Artificial Intelligence in the Product Experimentation Lifecycle
  22. Schrifliches Argumentieren verbessern über Fähigkeits- und Fächergrenzen hinweg
  23. Psychological interventions to prevent the onset of major depression in adults
  24. Termineinhaltung versus Bestände - Positionierung mit einem Estscheidungsmodell
  25. The Influence of Wall Thickness on Hollow Lateral Extrusion of Tubular Billets
  26. Einsatzfelder betrieblicher Umweltinformationssysteme anhand des EMA Frameworks
  27. Correlation of trends in cashmere production and declines of large wild mammals
  28. Innovation und Evolution von Geschäftsmodellen dargestellt am Beispiel BP Solar
  29. Gender Differences in Grip-Strength Depending on Arousal and Valence of Emotions
  30. Die Umsetzung von Art. 7 Energieeffizienz-Richtlinie 2012/27/EU in nationales Recht
  31. Nachhaltige Entwicklung ländlicher Räume durch Feminisierung der Landwirtschaft?