Praising the leader: personalist legitimation strategies and the deterioration of executive constraints
Research output: Journal contributions › Journal articles › Research › peer-review
Standard
In: Democratization, Vol. 30, No. 3, 01.03.2023, p. 419-439.
Research output: Journal contributions › Journal articles › Research › peer-review
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Praising the leader
T2 - personalist legitimation strategies and the deterioration of executive constraints
AU - Brunkert, Lennart
AU - von Soest, Christian
N1 - Funding Information: Both authors contributed equally to this article. The paper was presented at the 2020 virtual American Political Science Association Annual Meeting and Exhibition (September 10-13, 2020). We very much thank the panel participants as well as Sebastian Hellmeier, Stefan Kruse, Chris Welzel, and Kurt Weyland for their valuable suggestions on prior versions of the article. We are also grateful for the two reviewers’ constructive comments and swift turnaround time. Publisher Copyright: © 2022 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
PY - 2023/3/1
Y1 - 2023/3/1
N2 - In the face of current democratic backsliding and autocratization processes, research has rediscovered issues of autocratic legitimation. However, the question of whether rulers’ personalist rhetoric to bolster their legitimacy is followed by congruent political action remains underspecified. Using new expert-coded measures for 164 countries from the Varieties of Democracy project, we examine the political rhetoric–action link using using fixed effects models. The results confirm that shifts towards personalist legitimacy claims are no cheap talk but oftentimes important warning signals for a substantial deterioration of democratic quality, manifested in weaker judicial and legislative oversight of the executive branch. However, in contrast to much current concern, we show that liberal democracies seem to largely escape the negative repercussions of government discourses that increasingly stress the uniqueness of the ruler.
AB - In the face of current democratic backsliding and autocratization processes, research has rediscovered issues of autocratic legitimation. However, the question of whether rulers’ personalist rhetoric to bolster their legitimacy is followed by congruent political action remains underspecified. Using new expert-coded measures for 164 countries from the Varieties of Democracy project, we examine the political rhetoric–action link using using fixed effects models. The results confirm that shifts towards personalist legitimacy claims are no cheap talk but oftentimes important warning signals for a substantial deterioration of democratic quality, manifested in weaker judicial and legislative oversight of the executive branch. However, in contrast to much current concern, we show that liberal democracies seem to largely escape the negative repercussions of government discourses that increasingly stress the uniqueness of the ruler.
KW - autocratization
KW - charisma
KW - judicial constraints
KW - legislative constraints
KW - Legitimacy
KW - legitimation strategies
KW - person of the leader
KW - political rhetoric–action link
KW - Politics
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85142672551&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/3ed51285-e221-37c9-a227-32d149c1a806/
U2 - 10.1080/13510347.2022.2150760
DO - 10.1080/13510347.2022.2150760
M3 - Journal articles
AN - SCOPUS:85142672551
VL - 30
SP - 419
EP - 439
JO - Democratization
JF - Democratization
SN - 1351-0347
IS - 3
ER -