How Does Citizen Science Compare to Online Survey Panels? A Comparison of Food Knowledge and Perceptions Between the Zooniverse, Prolific and Qualtrics UK Panels

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Authors

  • Beth Armstrong
  • Christian Reynolds
  • Gemma Bridge
  • Libby Oakden
  • Changqiong Wang
  • Luca Panzone
  • Ximena Schmidt Rivera
  • Astrid Kause
  • Charles Ffoulkes
  • Coleman Krawczyk
  • Grant Miller
  • Stephen Serjeant

With an increasing focus on the uptake of healthy and sustainable diets, a growing body of research has explored consumer perceptions and understanding of the environmental impacts and safety of foods. However, this body of research has used a wide range of methods to recruit participants, which can influence the results obtained. The current research explores the impact of different recruitment methods upon observed estimations of the carbon footprint (gCO2e), energy content (Kcal), food safety and animal using three different online recruitment platforms; Qualtrics (N = 397), Prolific (N = 407), Zooniverse (N~601, based on unique IP addresses). Qualtrics and Prolific participants rated the carbon footprint, energy content, food safety and animal welfare of all foods in the survey. Zooniverse citizens rated the carbon footprint or energy content then food safety or animal welfare of all foods in the survey. Kruskal-Wallis and Chi-square analyses compared the energy content and carbon footprint estimations with validated values, and differences in estimate accuracy and perceptions between recruitment methods. Participants were unable to accurately estimate the carbon footprint and energy content of foods. The carbon footprint of all foods were overestimated, with the exception of beef and lamb which was underestimated. The calorie content of fruits and vegetables are typically overestimated. Perceptions of animal welfare and food safety differed by recruitment method. Zooniverse citizens rated animal welfare standards to be lower for meat products and eggs, compared to Qualtrics and Prolific participants. Overall, Qualtrics participants typically held the highest food risk perceptions, however this varied by food type. The lack of knowledge about the carbon footprint and energy content of foods demonstrates the need for consumer education and communication to enable the move toward healthier and more sustainable diets. Perceptions of food safety and animal welfare demonstrate a baseline from which to develop consumer focused communications and governance. We have shown that different recruitment tools can result in differences in observed perceptions. This highlights the need to carefully consider the recruitment tool being used in research when assessing participant knowledge and perceptions.

Original languageEnglish
Article number575021
JournalFrontiers in Sustainable Food Systems
Volume4
Number of pages11
ISSN2571-581X
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 27.01.2021
Externally publishedYes

Documents

DOI

Recently viewed

Researchers

  1. Roman Krämer

Publications

  1. A Theory-Based Concept for Fostering Sustainability Competencies in Engineering Programs
  2. How work values relate to the intention to work after retirement
  3. Microtomography on biomaterials using the harwi-2 beamline at desy
  4. BP’s Solar Business Model - A Case Study on BP’s Solar Business Case and its Drivers
  5. Local Responses to Global Integration in a Transnational Professional Service Firm
  6. Microstructural approaches of engineering materials
  7. How Organizing Matters for Societal Grand Challenges
  8. Three source-partitioning of CO2 fluxes based on a dual-isotope approach to investigate interactions between soil organic carbon, glucose and straw
  9. Daniel Fiott (ed.), The csdp in 2020: The EU’s legacy and ambition in security and defence
  10. Being perceived as a knowledge sender or knowledge receiver
  11. Formative assessment in every-day teaching of mathematical modelling
  12. Belief in Free Will Is Related to Internal Attribution in Self-Perception
  13. From Blue Collar to Open Commons Region
  14. Lufthansa Cargo´s alliance strategy: Spinning a web of stable relations
  15. Transformations of pesticides in the atmosphere
  16. Simulation wilder Spekulationen. Oder: Wie einmal Paul Baran mit einem falschen Modell das Internet erfand
  17. Different sizes, similar challenges
  18. Democratization as an emancipative process
  19. Commodity Studies with Polanyi
  20. Porträt ohne Modell
  21. The Impact of Power Distance Orientation on Recipients' Reactions to Participatory Versus Programmatic Change Communication
  22. Unintended Consequences of Field Experiments in Poverty Settings
  23. Written Reasoning in Primary School
  24. Portal als Experimentalsystem
  25. Performing university space
  26. Bildanalysen
  27. Socio-technical change linking expectations and representations
  28. Discovering cooperation
  29. Ereignis
  30. Russia: Inadequate Priority Given to Energy Efficiency and Climate Protection
  31. Are We Discovering or Making Concepts? Performativity in Concept Defining
  32. Materialität der Diagramme
  33. Genre(s)

Press / Media

  1. Ein Fädchen Hoffnung