1. //
  2. Start
  3. //
  4. Publications
  5. (Not) Thinking about you
  6. Output formats
  7. //

(Not) Thinking about you: Differences in victims’ and perpetrators’ self-focus after interpersonal and intergroup transgressions

Research output: Journal contributions › Journal articles › Research › peer-review

Standard

(Not) Thinking about you : Differences in victims’ and perpetrators’ self-focus after interpersonal and intergroup transgressions. / Siem, Birte; Barth, Markus.

In: European Journal of Social Psychology, Vol. 49, No. 5, 08.2019, p. 1007-1021.

Research output: Journal contributions › Journal articles › Research › peer-review

Harvard

Siem, B & Barth, M 2019, '(Not) Thinking about you: Differences in victims’ and perpetrators’ self-focus after interpersonal and intergroup transgressions', European Journal of Social Psychology, vol. 49, no. 5, pp. 1007-1021. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2584

APA

Siem, B., & Barth, M. (2019). (Not) Thinking about you: Differences in victims’ and perpetrators’ self-focus after interpersonal and intergroup transgressions. European Journal of Social Psychology, 49(5), 1007-1021. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2584

Vancouver

Siem B, Barth M. (Not) Thinking about you: Differences in victims’ and perpetrators’ self-focus after interpersonal and intergroup transgressions. European Journal of Social Psychology. 2019 Aug;49(5):1007-1021. doi: 10.1002/ejsp.2584

Bibtex

@article{184e5b9a599341b0be612c25d55f6083,
title = "(Not) Thinking about you: Differences in victims{\textquoteright} and perpetrators{\textquoteright} self-focus after interpersonal and intergroup transgressions",
abstract = "We tested the hypothesis that, following a transgression, victims and perpetrators differ in their focus of attention. In three studies (total N = 740), we manipulated participants{\textquoteright} social role (victim vs. perpetrator) in a hypothetical scenario (Studies 1 and 2) and in a perceived real conflict (Study 3) in an interpersonal (Studies 1 and 2) and an intergroup (Study 3) context. Results from all studies confirmed that victims show a stronger self-focus than perpetrators. Moreover, results suggest victims{\textquoteright} higher self-focus as a predictor of willingness to reconcile. Participants{\textquoteright} self-focus mediated the effect of social role on reconciliation intentions as a single mediator (Study 2), or in sequence with their motivation to consider the other party's needs (Study 3). Overall, the present research suggests that victims and perpetrators differ in their focus of attention, and that this difference has important theoretical and practical implications for reconciliation between individuals and between groups.",
keywords = "perpetrator, reconciliation, self-focus, socio-emotional needs, victim, Social Work and Social Pedagogics",
author = "Birte Siem and Markus Barth",
year = "2019",
month = aug,
doi = "10.1002/ejsp.2584",
language = "English",
volume = "49",
pages = "1007--1021",
journal = "European Journal of Social Psychology",
issn = "0046-2772",
publisher = "John Wiley & Sons Inc.",
number = "5",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - (Not) Thinking about you

T2 - Differences in victims’ and perpetrators’ self-focus after interpersonal and intergroup transgressions

AU - Siem, Birte

AU - Barth, Markus

PY - 2019/8

Y1 - 2019/8

N2 - We tested the hypothesis that, following a transgression, victims and perpetrators differ in their focus of attention. In three studies (total N = 740), we manipulated participants’ social role (victim vs. perpetrator) in a hypothetical scenario (Studies 1 and 2) and in a perceived real conflict (Study 3) in an interpersonal (Studies 1 and 2) and an intergroup (Study 3) context. Results from all studies confirmed that victims show a stronger self-focus than perpetrators. Moreover, results suggest victims’ higher self-focus as a predictor of willingness to reconcile. Participants’ self-focus mediated the effect of social role on reconciliation intentions as a single mediator (Study 2), or in sequence with their motivation to consider the other party's needs (Study 3). Overall, the present research suggests that victims and perpetrators differ in their focus of attention, and that this difference has important theoretical and practical implications for reconciliation between individuals and between groups.

AB - We tested the hypothesis that, following a transgression, victims and perpetrators differ in their focus of attention. In three studies (total N = 740), we manipulated participants’ social role (victim vs. perpetrator) in a hypothetical scenario (Studies 1 and 2) and in a perceived real conflict (Study 3) in an interpersonal (Studies 1 and 2) and an intergroup (Study 3) context. Results from all studies confirmed that victims show a stronger self-focus than perpetrators. Moreover, results suggest victims’ higher self-focus as a predictor of willingness to reconcile. Participants’ self-focus mediated the effect of social role on reconciliation intentions as a single mediator (Study 2), or in sequence with their motivation to consider the other party's needs (Study 3). Overall, the present research suggests that victims and perpetrators differ in their focus of attention, and that this difference has important theoretical and practical implications for reconciliation between individuals and between groups.

KW - perpetrator

KW - reconciliation

KW - self-focus

KW - socio-emotional needs

KW - victim

KW - Social Work and Social Pedagogics

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85065199848&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/ejsp.2584

DO - 10.1002/ejsp.2584

M3 - Journal articles

AN - SCOPUS:85065199848

VL - 49

SP - 1007

EP - 1021

JO - European Journal of Social Psychology

JF - European Journal of Social Psychology

SN - 0046-2772

IS - 5

ER -

Related by journal

Effects of diversity versus segregation on automatic approach and avoidance behavior towards own and other ethnic groups

Degner, J., Essien, I. & Reichardt, R., 01.10.2016, In: European Journal of Social Psychology. 46, 6, p. 783-791 9 p.

Research output: Journal contributions › Journal articles › Research › peer-review

Group evaluations as self-group distancing: Ingroup typicality moderates evaluative intergroup bias in stigmatized groups

Essien, I., Otten, S. & Degner, J., 10.2020, In: European Journal of Social Psychology. 50, 6, p. 1108-1124 17 p.

Research output: Journal contributions › Journal articles › Research › peer-review

Country-level and individual-level predictors of men's support for gender equality in 42 countries

Kosakowska-Berezecka, N., Besta, T., Bosson, J. K., Jurek, P., Vandello, J. A., Best, D. L., Wlodarczyk, A., Safdar, S., Zawisza, M., Żadkowska, M., Sobiecki, J., Agyemang, C. B., Akbaş, G., Ammirati, S., Anderson, J., Anjum, G., Aruta, J. J. B. R., Ashraf, M., Bakaitytė, A., Bi, C., Becker, M., Bender, M., Bërxulli, D., Bosak, J., Daalmans, S., Dandy, J., de Lemus, S., Dvorianchikov, N., Etchezahar, E., Froehlich, L., Gavreliuc, A., Gavreliuc, D., Gomez, Á., Greijdanus, H., Grigoryan, A., Hale, M. L., Hämer, H., Hoorens, V., Hutchings, P. B., Jensen, D. H., Kelmendi, K., Khachatryan, N., Kinahan, M., Kozlowski, D., Lauri, M. A., Li, J., Maitner, A. T., Makashvili, A., Mancini, T., Martiny, S. E., Đorđević, J. M., Moreno-Bella, E., Moscatelli, S., Bryan Moynihan, A., Muller, D., Ochoa, D., Adebayo, S. O., Pacilli, M. G., Palacio, J., Patnaik, S., Pavlopoulos, V., Piterová, I., Puzio, A., Pyrkosz-Pacyna, J., Rentería-Pérez, E., Rousseaux, T., Sainz, M., Salvati, M., Samekin, A., García-Sánchez, E., Schindler, S., Sherbaji, S., Sobhie, R., Sulejmanović, D., Sullivan, K. E., Torre, B., Torres, C. V., Ungaretti, J., Valshtein, T., Van Laar, C., van der Noll, J., Vasiutynskyi, V., Vohra, N., Zapata-Calvente, A. L. & Žukauskienė, R., 01.10.2020, In: European Journal of Social Psychology. 50, 6, p. 1276-1291 16 p.

Research output: Journal contributions › Journal articles › Research › peer-review

Subjective status and perceived legitimacy across countries

Brandt, M. J., Kuppens, T., Spears, R., Andrighetto, L., Autin, F., Babincak, P., Badea, C., Bae, J., Batruch, A., Becker, J. C., Bocian, K., Bodroža, B., Bourguignon, D., Bukowski, M., Butera, F., Butler, S. E., Chryssochoou, X., Conway, P., Crawford, J. T., Croizet, J. C., de Lemus, S., Degner, J., Dragon, P., Durante, F., Easterbrook, M. J., Essien, I., Forgas, J. P., González, R., Graf, S., Halama, P., Han, G., Hong, R. Y., Houdek, P., Igou, E. R., Inbar, Y., Jetten, J., Jimenez Leal, W., Jiménez-Moya, G., Karunagharan, J. K., Kende, A., Korzh, M., Laham, S. M., Lammers, J., Lim, L., Manstead, A. S. R., Međedović, J., Melton, Z. J., Motyl, M., Ntani, S., Owuamalam, C. K., Peker, M., Platow, M. J., Prims, J. P., Reyna, C., Rubin, M., Saab, R., Sankaran, S., Shepherd, L., Sibley, C. G., Sobkow, A., Spruyt, B., Stroebaek, P., Sümer, N., Sweetman, J., Teixeira, C. P., Toma, C., Ujhelyi, A., van der Toorn, J., van Hiel, A., Vásquez-Echeverría, A., Vazquez, A., Vianello, M., Vranka, M., Yzerbyt, V. & Zimmerman, J. L., 01.08.2020, In: European Journal of Social Psychology. 50, 5, p. 921-942 22 p.

Research output: Journal contributions › Journal articles › Research › peer-review

Antecedents and consequences of autonomy- and dependency-oriented help toward refugees

Becker, J. C., Ksenofontov, I., Siem, B. & Love, A., 06.2019, In: European Journal of Social Psychology. 49, 4, p. 831-838 8 p.

Research output: Journal contributions › Journal articles › Research › peer-review

Other publications by the same author(s)

Key experiences of volunteers in refugee aid

Landmann, H., Siem, B., Fuchs, B. & Rohmann, A., 27.07.2023, (E-pub ahead of print) In: Journal of Immigrant and Refugee Studies. 16 p.

Research output: Journal contributions › Journal articles › Research › peer-review

On the trajectory of discrimination: A meta-analysis and forecasting survey capturing 44 years of field experiments on gender and hiring decisions

Gender Audits Forecasting Collaboration, Schaerer, M., Plessis, C. D., Nguyen, M. H. B., Aert, R. C. M. V., Tiokhin, L., Lakens, D., Clemente, E. G., Pfeiffer, T., Dreber, A., Johannesson, M., Clark, C. J. & Siem, B., 01.11.2023, In: Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. 179, 26 p., 104280.

Research output: Journal contributions › Journal articles › Research › peer-review

„Weiß und gebildet?“ Auf dem Weg zu einer divers(er)en Klimaschutzbewegung

Siem, B. & Essien, I., 2023, In: In-Mind Magazin. 4

Research output: Journal contributions › Journal articles › Transfer › peer-review

Can cross-group contact predict advantaged group member’s willingness to engage in costly solidarity-based actions? Yes, if the contact is politicized

Becker, J. C., Wright, S. C. & Siem, B., 03.2022, In: Testing, Psychometrics, Methodology in Applied Psychology. 29, 1 Special Issue, p. 123-139 17 p.

Research output: Journal contributions › Journal articles › Research › peer-review

Social Support in Online Peer Groups for Celiac Disease

Köstlin, D., Siem, B. & Rohmann, A., 01.07.2023, In: European Journal of Health Psychology. 30, 3, p. 138-143 6 p.

Research output: Journal contributions › Journal articles › Research › peer-review

DOI