(Not) Thinking about you: Differences in victims’ and perpetrators’ self-focus after interpersonal and intergroup transgressions

Publikation: Beiträge in ZeitschriftenZeitschriftenaufsätzeForschungbegutachtet

Standard

(Not) Thinking about you: Differences in victims’ and perpetrators’ self-focus after interpersonal and intergroup transgressions. / Siem, Birte; Barth, Markus.
in: European Journal of Social Psychology, Jahrgang 49, Nr. 5, 08.2019, S. 1007-1021.

Publikation: Beiträge in ZeitschriftenZeitschriftenaufsätzeForschungbegutachtet

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{184e5b9a599341b0be612c25d55f6083,
title = "(Not) Thinking about you: Differences in victims{\textquoteright} and perpetrators{\textquoteright} self-focus after interpersonal and intergroup transgressions",
abstract = "We tested the hypothesis that, following a transgression, victims and perpetrators differ in their focus of attention. In three studies (total N = 740), we manipulated participants{\textquoteright} social role (victim vs. perpetrator) in a hypothetical scenario (Studies 1 and 2) and in a perceived real conflict (Study 3) in an interpersonal (Studies 1 and 2) and an intergroup (Study 3) context. Results from all studies confirmed that victims show a stronger self-focus than perpetrators. Moreover, results suggest victims{\textquoteright} higher self-focus as a predictor of willingness to reconcile. Participants{\textquoteright} self-focus mediated the effect of social role on reconciliation intentions as a single mediator (Study 2), or in sequence with their motivation to consider the other party's needs (Study 3). Overall, the present research suggests that victims and perpetrators differ in their focus of attention, and that this difference has important theoretical and practical implications for reconciliation between individuals and between groups.",
keywords = "perpetrator, reconciliation, self-focus, socio-emotional needs, victim, Social Work and Social Pedagogics",
author = "Birte Siem and Markus Barth",
year = "2019",
month = aug,
doi = "10.1002/ejsp.2584",
language = "English",
volume = "49",
pages = "1007--1021",
journal = "European Journal of Social Psychology",
issn = "0046-2772",
publisher = "John Wiley & Sons Ltd.",
number = "5",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - (Not) Thinking about you

T2 - Differences in victims’ and perpetrators’ self-focus after interpersonal and intergroup transgressions

AU - Siem, Birte

AU - Barth, Markus

PY - 2019/8

Y1 - 2019/8

N2 - We tested the hypothesis that, following a transgression, victims and perpetrators differ in their focus of attention. In three studies (total N = 740), we manipulated participants’ social role (victim vs. perpetrator) in a hypothetical scenario (Studies 1 and 2) and in a perceived real conflict (Study 3) in an interpersonal (Studies 1 and 2) and an intergroup (Study 3) context. Results from all studies confirmed that victims show a stronger self-focus than perpetrators. Moreover, results suggest victims’ higher self-focus as a predictor of willingness to reconcile. Participants’ self-focus mediated the effect of social role on reconciliation intentions as a single mediator (Study 2), or in sequence with their motivation to consider the other party's needs (Study 3). Overall, the present research suggests that victims and perpetrators differ in their focus of attention, and that this difference has important theoretical and practical implications for reconciliation between individuals and between groups.

AB - We tested the hypothesis that, following a transgression, victims and perpetrators differ in their focus of attention. In three studies (total N = 740), we manipulated participants’ social role (victim vs. perpetrator) in a hypothetical scenario (Studies 1 and 2) and in a perceived real conflict (Study 3) in an interpersonal (Studies 1 and 2) and an intergroup (Study 3) context. Results from all studies confirmed that victims show a stronger self-focus than perpetrators. Moreover, results suggest victims’ higher self-focus as a predictor of willingness to reconcile. Participants’ self-focus mediated the effect of social role on reconciliation intentions as a single mediator (Study 2), or in sequence with their motivation to consider the other party's needs (Study 3). Overall, the present research suggests that victims and perpetrators differ in their focus of attention, and that this difference has important theoretical and practical implications for reconciliation between individuals and between groups.

KW - perpetrator

KW - reconciliation

KW - self-focus

KW - socio-emotional needs

KW - victim

KW - Social Work and Social Pedagogics

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85065199848&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/ejsp.2584

DO - 10.1002/ejsp.2584

M3 - Journal articles

AN - SCOPUS:85065199848

VL - 49

SP - 1007

EP - 1021

JO - European Journal of Social Psychology

JF - European Journal of Social Psychology

SN - 0046-2772

IS - 5

ER -

DOI

Zuletzt angesehen

Publikationen

  1. The Politics of Party Funding
  2. Altersversorgung, betriebliche
  3. Organization as communication
  4. Reform nach deutschem Vorbild?
  5. Consumer information problems
  6. Organization as Communication
  7. Neue Formen der Beschäftigung
  8. The multipole resonance probe
  9. Magnesium and Magnesium Alloys
  10. Interaktion statt Distribution
  11. The path biography methodology
  12. Der Preis für Taxikonzessionen
  13. Anpassung und Selbstbehauptung.
  14. Sozialpädagogik und Psychodrama
  15. Ansatz- und Bewertungsstetigkeit
  16. Transnational labour solidarity
  17. Messung von Markenvorstellungen
  18. Gesundheit und Urlaubstourismus
  19. Wellness as a Hybrid Phenomenon
  20. Die Energiewende in Deutschland
  21. Internationaler Personaleinsatz
  22. Buchhaltung und Jahresabschluss
  23. John Stuart Mill zur Einführung
  24. Der Kunde als Innovationsquelle
  25. Grundfragen ästhetischer Bildung
  26. Mining product configurator data
  27. § 66 Islamische Republik Pakistan
  28. Frauen in Unternehmensberatungen
  29. From Subjectivity to Objectivity
  30. Digitization and path disruption
  31. Strategisches Logistikmanagement
  32. From Geopolitics to Geoeconomics
  33. Marktorientierte Markenbewertung
  34. Partizipatives Regieren in der EU
  35. Im Schatten der Großen Koalition?
  36. Good Governance and Bad Neighbors?
  37. Rezension zu "The Lonesome Painter"
  38. Ein anderes land, eine andere stadt
  39. Bildung für nachhaltige Entwicklung
  40. § 61 Sozialistische Republik Vietnam
  41. Fernreisen als postkoloniales Reisen
  42. Noise level estimation and detection
  43. Close to, but still out of, government
  44. The Forgotten Function of Forgetting
  45. Hub, Fine-Tuner oder Business as Usual?