Non-technical success factors for bioenergy projects-Learning from a multiple case study in Japan

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Standard

Non-technical success factors for bioenergy projects-Learning from a multiple case study in Japan. / Blumer, Yann B.; Stauffacher, Michael; Lang, Daniel J. et al.
In: Energy Policy, Vol. 60, No. 9, 09.2013, p. 386 - 395.

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Blumer YB, Stauffacher M, Lang DJ, Hayashi K, Uchida S. Non-technical success factors for bioenergy projects-Learning from a multiple case study in Japan. Energy Policy. 2013 Sept;60(9):386 - 395. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2013.05.075

Bibtex

@article{e1622e8f85c044f6a6a3f49b735fb94f,
title = "Non-technical success factors for bioenergy projects-Learning from a multiple case study in Japan",
abstract = "There is wide agreement in the literature that non-technical factors play a decisive role in the successful implementation of bioenergy projects. One underlying reason is that such projects require the involvement of many stakeholders, such as feedstock producers, engineers, authorities and the concerned public. We analyze the role of bioenergy-specific non-technical factors for the success of bioenergy projects. In a broad literature review we first identify potential success factors belonging to the five dimensions project characteristics, policy framework, regional integration, public perception and stakeholders. Using these factors as conceptual framework, we next analyze six Japanese pilot projects for bioenergy utilization supported by Japans Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries Research Council. We apply Rough Set Analysis, a data mining method that can be used for small sample sizes to identify patterns in a dataset. We find that, by and large, non-technical factors from all five dimensions - such as the stability of the local policy framework - co-occur with project success. Furthermore, we show that there are diverging interpretations as to what success in a bioenergy project means. This requires tradeoffs between various goals, which should be identified and addressed explicitly at early stages of such a project.",
keywords = "Energy research, Bioenergy, Success factors, Japan, Bioenergy, Japan, Success factors",
author = "Blumer, {Yann B.} and Michael Stauffacher and Lang, {Daniel J.} and Kiyotada Hayashi and Susumu Uchida",
year = "2013",
month = sep,
doi = "10.1016/j.enpol.2013.05.075",
language = "English",
volume = "60",
pages = "386 -- 395",
journal = "Energy Policy",
issn = "0301-4215",
publisher = "Elsevier B.V.",
number = "9",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Non-technical success factors for bioenergy projects-Learning from a multiple case study in Japan

AU - Blumer, Yann B.

AU - Stauffacher, Michael

AU - Lang, Daniel J.

AU - Hayashi, Kiyotada

AU - Uchida, Susumu

PY - 2013/9

Y1 - 2013/9

N2 - There is wide agreement in the literature that non-technical factors play a decisive role in the successful implementation of bioenergy projects. One underlying reason is that such projects require the involvement of many stakeholders, such as feedstock producers, engineers, authorities and the concerned public. We analyze the role of bioenergy-specific non-technical factors for the success of bioenergy projects. In a broad literature review we first identify potential success factors belonging to the five dimensions project characteristics, policy framework, regional integration, public perception and stakeholders. Using these factors as conceptual framework, we next analyze six Japanese pilot projects for bioenergy utilization supported by Japans Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries Research Council. We apply Rough Set Analysis, a data mining method that can be used for small sample sizes to identify patterns in a dataset. We find that, by and large, non-technical factors from all five dimensions - such as the stability of the local policy framework - co-occur with project success. Furthermore, we show that there are diverging interpretations as to what success in a bioenergy project means. This requires tradeoffs between various goals, which should be identified and addressed explicitly at early stages of such a project.

AB - There is wide agreement in the literature that non-technical factors play a decisive role in the successful implementation of bioenergy projects. One underlying reason is that such projects require the involvement of many stakeholders, such as feedstock producers, engineers, authorities and the concerned public. We analyze the role of bioenergy-specific non-technical factors for the success of bioenergy projects. In a broad literature review we first identify potential success factors belonging to the five dimensions project characteristics, policy framework, regional integration, public perception and stakeholders. Using these factors as conceptual framework, we next analyze six Japanese pilot projects for bioenergy utilization supported by Japans Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries Research Council. We apply Rough Set Analysis, a data mining method that can be used for small sample sizes to identify patterns in a dataset. We find that, by and large, non-technical factors from all five dimensions - such as the stability of the local policy framework - co-occur with project success. Furthermore, we show that there are diverging interpretations as to what success in a bioenergy project means. This requires tradeoffs between various goals, which should be identified and addressed explicitly at early stages of such a project.

KW - Energy research

KW - Bioenergy

KW - Success factors

KW - Japan

KW - Bioenergy

KW - Japan

KW - Success factors

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84880333068&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/7779c7ae-9f24-3655-b73f-7e8b69f811f7/

U2 - 10.1016/j.enpol.2013.05.075

DO - 10.1016/j.enpol.2013.05.075

M3 - Journal articles

VL - 60

SP - 386

EP - 395

JO - Energy Policy

JF - Energy Policy

SN - 0301-4215

IS - 9

ER -

Recently viewed

Publications

  1. Decision-making models for Robotic Warehouse
  2. Motivation for the Continuation of Work
  3. Erroneous Examples: A Preliminary Investigation into Learning Benefits
  4. Contrasting patterns of intraspecific trait variability in native and non-native plant species along an elevational gradient on Tenerife, Canary Islands
  5. Leverage points and levers of inclusive conservation in protected areas
  6. Indicators for relational values of nature’s contributions to good quality of life
  7. Modeling of cooperative tasks in business-IT management - A proposal for a domain-specific extension of BPMN 2.0
  8. Culture as an Engine of Local Development Processes
  9. Sprachliche Muster
  10. Sprachen in Liechtenstein
  11. Ecosystem functions as indicators for heathland responses to nitrogen fertilisation
  12. A path to clean water
  13. Using (Quantitative) Structure-Activity Relationships in Pharmaceutical Risk Assessment
  14. The pace of range expansion
  15. Introduction
  16. Key criteria for developing ecosystem service indicators to inform decision making
  17. Germination performance of native and non-native Ulmus pumila populations
  18. Beyond Structural Adjustment
  19. Going beyond certificates
  20. Optimization and Validation of an LC Method for the Determination of Cefdinir in Dosage Form and Human Urine
  21. Development and criterion validity of differentiated and elevated vocational interests in adolescence
  22. Response of saproxylic beetles to small-scale habitat connectivity depends on trophic levels
  23. Explaining Investment Dynamics: Empirical Evidence from German New Ventures
  24. Acceleration as process
  25. Calibrated Passive Sampling - Multi-plot Field Measurements of NH3 Emissions with a Combination of Dynamic Tube Method and Passive Samplers
  26. System versus Intention
  27. Performance Saga: Interview 06
  28. One step forward, two steps back
  29. Construal level theory
  30. Optimising patterns of life conduct

Press / Media

  1. Was ist Queer Theory?