Neue Formate transdisziplinärer Forschung: Ausdifferenzierte Brücken zwischen Wissenschaft und Praxis
Research output: Journal contributions › Journal articles › Research › peer-review
Standard
In: GAIA, Vol. 29, No. 2, 22.07.2020, p. 106-114.
Research output: Journal contributions › Journal articles › Research › peer-review
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Neue Formate transdisziplinärer Forschung
T2 - Ausdifferenzierte Brücken zwischen Wissenschaft und Praxis
AU - Grunwald, Armin
AU - Schäfer, Martina
AU - Bergmann, Matthias
PY - 2020/7/22
Y1 - 2020/7/22
N2 - Transdisciplinary research has gained new momentum in recent years. Several new research formats have been developed and tested, primarily motivated by new funding opportunities, and based on new initiatives from research communities. These new formats comprise real-world lab research, new approaches to academic qualification, new approaches to innovation co-development, and the exploration of new relationships between science and society. In this paper, we considered real-world labs, advanced graduate schools, innovation groups and recent developments in the field of citizen science. We analyzed and compared these formats with respect to their novelty in an effort to develop and explore overarching hypotheses for transdisciplinary research, for example, with respect to potentials and paths of impact. This was all done with the aim of creating oversight to promote further conceptual development in the increasingly fragmented field of transdisciplinary research.
AB - Transdisciplinary research has gained new momentum in recent years. Several new research formats have been developed and tested, primarily motivated by new funding opportunities, and based on new initiatives from research communities. These new formats comprise real-world lab research, new approaches to academic qualification, new approaches to innovation co-development, and the exploration of new relationships between science and society. In this paper, we considered real-world labs, advanced graduate schools, innovation groups and recent developments in the field of citizen science. We analyzed and compared these formats with respect to their novelty in an effort to develop and explore overarching hypotheses for transdisciplinary research, for example, with respect to potentials and paths of impact. This was all done with the aim of creating oversight to promote further conceptual development in the increasingly fragmented field of transdisciplinary research.
KW - Advanced graduate school
KW - Citizen science
KW - Innovation group
KW - Real-world lab
KW - Transdisciplinary research
KW - Transdisziplinäre Studien
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85092337948&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/fd766f61-243d-3a36-910b-437255e6daa3/
U2 - 10.14512/GAIA.29.2.8
DO - 10.14512/GAIA.29.2.8
M3 - Zeitschriftenaufsätze
AN - SCOPUS:85092337948
VL - 29
SP - 106
EP - 114
JO - GAIA
JF - GAIA
SN - 0940-5550
IS - 2
ER -