Neue Formate transdisziplinärer Forschung: Ausdifferenzierte Brücken zwischen Wissenschaft und Praxis

Publikation: Beiträge in ZeitschriftenZeitschriftenaufsätzeForschungbegutachtet

Standard

Neue Formate transdisziplinärer Forschung : Ausdifferenzierte Brücken zwischen Wissenschaft und Praxis. / Grunwald, Armin; Schäfer, Martina; Bergmann, Matthias.

in: GAIA, Jahrgang 29, Nr. 2, 22.07.2020, S. 106-114.

Publikation: Beiträge in ZeitschriftenZeitschriftenaufsätzeForschungbegutachtet

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Grunwald A, Schäfer M, Bergmann M. Neue Formate transdisziplinärer Forschung: Ausdifferenzierte Brücken zwischen Wissenschaft und Praxis. GAIA. 2020 Jul 22;29(2):106-114. doi: 10.14512/GAIA.29.2.8

Bibtex

@article{872013eb0c7e4425b55527b513d848b5,
title = "Neue Formate transdisziplin{\"a}rer Forschung: Ausdifferenzierte Br{\"u}cken zwischen Wissenschaft und Praxis",
abstract = "Transdisciplinary research has gained new momentum in recent years. Several new research formats have been developed and tested, primarily motivated by new funding opportunities, and based on new initiatives from research communities. These new formats comprise real-world lab research, new approaches to academic qualification, new approaches to innovation co-development, and the exploration of new relationships between science and society. In this paper, we considered real-world labs, advanced graduate schools, innovation groups and recent developments in the field of citizen science. We analyzed and compared these formats with respect to their novelty in an effort to develop and explore overarching hypotheses for transdisciplinary research, for example, with respect to potentials and paths of impact. This was all done with the aim of creating oversight to promote further conceptual development in the increasingly fragmented field of transdisciplinary research.",
keywords = "Advanced graduate school, Citizen science, Innovation group, Real-world lab, Transdisciplinary research, Transdisziplin{\"a}re Studien",
author = "Armin Grunwald and Martina Sch{\"a}fer and Matthias Bergmann",
year = "2020",
month = jul,
day = "22",
doi = "10.14512/GAIA.29.2.8",
language = "Deutsch",
volume = "29",
pages = "106--114",
journal = "GAIA",
issn = "0940-5550",
publisher = "oekom verlag GmbH",
number = "2",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Neue Formate transdisziplinärer Forschung

T2 - Ausdifferenzierte Brücken zwischen Wissenschaft und Praxis

AU - Grunwald, Armin

AU - Schäfer, Martina

AU - Bergmann, Matthias

PY - 2020/7/22

Y1 - 2020/7/22

N2 - Transdisciplinary research has gained new momentum in recent years. Several new research formats have been developed and tested, primarily motivated by new funding opportunities, and based on new initiatives from research communities. These new formats comprise real-world lab research, new approaches to academic qualification, new approaches to innovation co-development, and the exploration of new relationships between science and society. In this paper, we considered real-world labs, advanced graduate schools, innovation groups and recent developments in the field of citizen science. We analyzed and compared these formats with respect to their novelty in an effort to develop and explore overarching hypotheses for transdisciplinary research, for example, with respect to potentials and paths of impact. This was all done with the aim of creating oversight to promote further conceptual development in the increasingly fragmented field of transdisciplinary research.

AB - Transdisciplinary research has gained new momentum in recent years. Several new research formats have been developed and tested, primarily motivated by new funding opportunities, and based on new initiatives from research communities. These new formats comprise real-world lab research, new approaches to academic qualification, new approaches to innovation co-development, and the exploration of new relationships between science and society. In this paper, we considered real-world labs, advanced graduate schools, innovation groups and recent developments in the field of citizen science. We analyzed and compared these formats with respect to their novelty in an effort to develop and explore overarching hypotheses for transdisciplinary research, for example, with respect to potentials and paths of impact. This was all done with the aim of creating oversight to promote further conceptual development in the increasingly fragmented field of transdisciplinary research.

KW - Advanced graduate school

KW - Citizen science

KW - Innovation group

KW - Real-world lab

KW - Transdisciplinary research

KW - Transdisziplinäre Studien

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85092337948&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/fd766f61-243d-3a36-910b-437255e6daa3/

U2 - 10.14512/GAIA.29.2.8

DO - 10.14512/GAIA.29.2.8

M3 - Zeitschriftenaufsätze

AN - SCOPUS:85092337948

VL - 29

SP - 106

EP - 114

JO - GAIA

JF - GAIA

SN - 0940-5550

IS - 2

ER -

Dokumente

DOI