Multiple forest structural elements are needed to promote beetle biomass, diversity and abundance

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Standard

Multiple forest structural elements are needed to promote beetle biomass, diversity and abundance. / Rappa, Nolan J.; Staab, Michael; Frey, Julian et al.
In: Forest Ecosystems, Vol. 9, 100056, 01.2022.

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Rappa NJ, Staab M, Frey J, Winiger N, Klein AM. Multiple forest structural elements are needed to promote beetle biomass, diversity and abundance. Forest Ecosystems. 2022 Jan;9:100056. doi: 10.1016/j.fecs.2022.100056

Bibtex

@article{fb887c708ac04d2387f302bc7b052fc3,
title = "Multiple forest structural elements are needed to promote beetle biomass, diversity and abundance",
abstract = "Background: Retention forestry is a management strategy aiming to mitigate biodiversity loss by retaining structural elements such as dead trees that would otherwise be removed. Here we analyze the biomass, diversity and abundance among forest beetles collected using window traps on 128 1-ha forest sites reflecting gradients in the amount of structural elements in southwestern Germany. Results: We found that beetle biomass increased with mean diameter at breast height (a measure of tree size), and decreased with stand structural complexity. Biomass of individual feeding guilds responded differently to forest structural elements, namely lying deadwood, understory complexity, tree basal area and stand structural complexity. Beetle family diversity increased with the effective number of layers, i.e. 1-m forest strata occupied by vegetation assessed via terrestrial laser scanning. Abundance of feeding guilds responded to only elevation and share of deciduous trees. Community composition in terms of biomass was structured by forest elements similar to biomass of individual feeding guilds, with the addition of lying deadwood. This differed from community composition in terms of abundance of feeding guilds, which was structured by primarily standing deadwood volume and share of deciduous trees. Conclusions: Our results show that biomass, diversity and abundance respond differently to forest structural elements. This suggests that the concurrent prioritization of multiple forest elements is needed to promote forest beetles, with more focus placed on the differing resource needs among feeding guilds. In addition, retention strategies should also consider the varying responses of beetle biodiversity metrics when assessing the importance of forest structural elements.",
keywords = "Allometry, Biodiversity, Coleoptera, Forest management, Terrestrial laser scanning, Window trap, Biology, Ecosystems Research",
author = "Rappa, {Nolan J.} and Michael Staab and Julian Frey and Nathalie Winiger and Klein, {Alexandra Maria}",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2022 The Authors",
year = "2022",
month = jan,
doi = "10.1016/j.fecs.2022.100056",
language = "English",
volume = "9",
journal = "Forest Ecosystems",
issn = "2095-6355",
publisher = "KeAi Communications Co.",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Multiple forest structural elements are needed to promote beetle biomass, diversity and abundance

AU - Rappa, Nolan J.

AU - Staab, Michael

AU - Frey, Julian

AU - Winiger, Nathalie

AU - Klein, Alexandra Maria

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2022 The Authors

PY - 2022/1

Y1 - 2022/1

N2 - Background: Retention forestry is a management strategy aiming to mitigate biodiversity loss by retaining structural elements such as dead trees that would otherwise be removed. Here we analyze the biomass, diversity and abundance among forest beetles collected using window traps on 128 1-ha forest sites reflecting gradients in the amount of structural elements in southwestern Germany. Results: We found that beetle biomass increased with mean diameter at breast height (a measure of tree size), and decreased with stand structural complexity. Biomass of individual feeding guilds responded differently to forest structural elements, namely lying deadwood, understory complexity, tree basal area and stand structural complexity. Beetle family diversity increased with the effective number of layers, i.e. 1-m forest strata occupied by vegetation assessed via terrestrial laser scanning. Abundance of feeding guilds responded to only elevation and share of deciduous trees. Community composition in terms of biomass was structured by forest elements similar to biomass of individual feeding guilds, with the addition of lying deadwood. This differed from community composition in terms of abundance of feeding guilds, which was structured by primarily standing deadwood volume and share of deciduous trees. Conclusions: Our results show that biomass, diversity and abundance respond differently to forest structural elements. This suggests that the concurrent prioritization of multiple forest elements is needed to promote forest beetles, with more focus placed on the differing resource needs among feeding guilds. In addition, retention strategies should also consider the varying responses of beetle biodiversity metrics when assessing the importance of forest structural elements.

AB - Background: Retention forestry is a management strategy aiming to mitigate biodiversity loss by retaining structural elements such as dead trees that would otherwise be removed. Here we analyze the biomass, diversity and abundance among forest beetles collected using window traps on 128 1-ha forest sites reflecting gradients in the amount of structural elements in southwestern Germany. Results: We found that beetle biomass increased with mean diameter at breast height (a measure of tree size), and decreased with stand structural complexity. Biomass of individual feeding guilds responded differently to forest structural elements, namely lying deadwood, understory complexity, tree basal area and stand structural complexity. Beetle family diversity increased with the effective number of layers, i.e. 1-m forest strata occupied by vegetation assessed via terrestrial laser scanning. Abundance of feeding guilds responded to only elevation and share of deciduous trees. Community composition in terms of biomass was structured by forest elements similar to biomass of individual feeding guilds, with the addition of lying deadwood. This differed from community composition in terms of abundance of feeding guilds, which was structured by primarily standing deadwood volume and share of deciduous trees. Conclusions: Our results show that biomass, diversity and abundance respond differently to forest structural elements. This suggests that the concurrent prioritization of multiple forest elements is needed to promote forest beetles, with more focus placed on the differing resource needs among feeding guilds. In addition, retention strategies should also consider the varying responses of beetle biodiversity metrics when assessing the importance of forest structural elements.

KW - Allometry

KW - Biodiversity

KW - Coleoptera

KW - Forest management

KW - Terrestrial laser scanning

KW - Window trap

KW - Biology

KW - Ecosystems Research

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85135512675&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.fecs.2022.100056

DO - 10.1016/j.fecs.2022.100056

M3 - Journal articles

AN - SCOPUS:85135512675

VL - 9

JO - Forest Ecosystems

JF - Forest Ecosystems

SN - 2095-6355

M1 - 100056

ER -