Jointly experimenting for transformation? Shaping real-world laboratories by comparing them

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Standard

Jointly experimenting for transformation? Shaping real-world laboratories by comparing them. / Schäpke, Niko; Stelzer, Franziska; Caniglia, Guido et al.
In: GAIA, Vol. 27, 01.01.2018, p. 85-96.

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Schäpke, N, Stelzer, F, Caniglia, G, Bergmann, M, Wanner, M, Singer-Brodowski, M, Loorbach, D, Olsson, P, Baedeker, C & Lang, DJ 2018, 'Jointly experimenting for transformation? Shaping real-world laboratories by comparing them', GAIA, vol. 27, pp. 85-96. https://doi.org/10.14512/gaia.27.S1.16

APA

Schäpke, N., Stelzer, F., Caniglia, G., Bergmann, M., Wanner, M., Singer-Brodowski, M., Loorbach, D., Olsson, P., Baedeker, C., & Lang, D. J. (2018). Jointly experimenting for transformation? Shaping real-world laboratories by comparing them. GAIA, 27, 85-96. https://doi.org/10.14512/gaia.27.S1.16

Vancouver

Schäpke N, Stelzer F, Caniglia G, Bergmann M, Wanner M, Singer-Brodowski M et al. Jointly experimenting for transformation? Shaping real-world laboratories by comparing them. GAIA. 2018 Jan 1;27:85-96. doi: 10.14512/gaia.27.S1.16

Bibtex

@article{ff6caf21dab24a0091feea9c43b3bf72,
title = "Jointly experimenting for transformation?: Shaping real-world laboratories by comparing them",
abstract = "Real-world laboratories (RwLs, German Reallabore) belong to a family of increasingly popular experimental and transdisciplinary research approaches at the science-society interface. As these approaches in general, and RwLs in particular, often lack clear definitions of key characteristics and their operationalization, we make two contributions in this article. First, we identify five core characteristics of RwLs: contribution to transformation, experimental methods, transdisciplinary research mode, scalability and transferability of results, as well as scientific and societal learning and reflexivity. Second, we compare RwLs to similar research approaches according to the five characteristics. In this way, we provide an orientation on experimental and transdisciplin ary research for societal transformations, and reveal the contributions of this type of research in supporting societal change. Our findings enable learning across the different approaches and highlight their complementarities, with a particular focus on RwLs.",
keywords = "Living labs, Real-world laboratory, Reallabor, Societal transformations, Sustainability transitions, Transdisciplinarity, Transformation labs, Urban transition labs, Sustainability Science",
author = "Niko Sch{\"a}pke and Franziska Stelzer and Guido Caniglia and Matthias Bergmann and Matthias Wanner and Mandy Singer-Brodowski and Derk Loorbach and Per Olsson and Carolin Baedeker and Lang, {Daniel J.}",
year = "2018",
month = jan,
day = "1",
doi = "10.14512/gaia.27.S1.16",
language = "English",
volume = "27",
pages = "85--96",
journal = "GAIA",
issn = "0940-5550",
publisher = "Oekom - Gesellschaft fuer Oekologische Kommunikation mbH",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Jointly experimenting for transformation?

T2 - Shaping real-world laboratories by comparing them

AU - Schäpke, Niko

AU - Stelzer, Franziska

AU - Caniglia, Guido

AU - Bergmann, Matthias

AU - Wanner, Matthias

AU - Singer-Brodowski, Mandy

AU - Loorbach, Derk

AU - Olsson, Per

AU - Baedeker, Carolin

AU - Lang, Daniel J.

PY - 2018/1/1

Y1 - 2018/1/1

N2 - Real-world laboratories (RwLs, German Reallabore) belong to a family of increasingly popular experimental and transdisciplinary research approaches at the science-society interface. As these approaches in general, and RwLs in particular, often lack clear definitions of key characteristics and their operationalization, we make two contributions in this article. First, we identify five core characteristics of RwLs: contribution to transformation, experimental methods, transdisciplinary research mode, scalability and transferability of results, as well as scientific and societal learning and reflexivity. Second, we compare RwLs to similar research approaches according to the five characteristics. In this way, we provide an orientation on experimental and transdisciplin ary research for societal transformations, and reveal the contributions of this type of research in supporting societal change. Our findings enable learning across the different approaches and highlight their complementarities, with a particular focus on RwLs.

AB - Real-world laboratories (RwLs, German Reallabore) belong to a family of increasingly popular experimental and transdisciplinary research approaches at the science-society interface. As these approaches in general, and RwLs in particular, often lack clear definitions of key characteristics and their operationalization, we make two contributions in this article. First, we identify five core characteristics of RwLs: contribution to transformation, experimental methods, transdisciplinary research mode, scalability and transferability of results, as well as scientific and societal learning and reflexivity. Second, we compare RwLs to similar research approaches according to the five characteristics. In this way, we provide an orientation on experimental and transdisciplin ary research for societal transformations, and reveal the contributions of this type of research in supporting societal change. Our findings enable learning across the different approaches and highlight their complementarities, with a particular focus on RwLs.

KW - Living labs

KW - Real-world laboratory

KW - Reallabor

KW - Societal transformations

KW - Sustainability transitions

KW - Transdisciplinarity

KW - Transformation labs

KW - Urban transition labs

KW - Sustainability Science

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85046150920&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.14512/gaia.27.S1.16

DO - 10.14512/gaia.27.S1.16

M3 - Journal articles

AN - SCOPUS:85046150920

VL - 27

SP - 85

EP - 96

JO - GAIA

JF - GAIA

SN - 0940-5550

ER -

DOI

Recently viewed

Publications

  1. Mechanisms of teleological change
  2. Managing Knowledge in Organization Studies Through Instrumentation
  3. Toward a better understanding of the mindsets of negotiators
  4. ETL ensembles for chunking, NER and SRL
  5. Polarization of Time and Income
  6. Advancing Decision-Visualization Environments—Empirically informed Design Recommendations
  7. Challenges in political interviews
  8. Evaluation of Magnesium Die-Casting Alloys for Elevated Temperature Applications
  9. Form and Relation
  10. Adjusting the Sails
  11. Investigation of minimum creep rates and stress exponents calculated from tensile and compressive creep data of magnesium alloy AE42
  12. Tree phylogenetic diversity structures multitrophic communities
  13. Water quantity and quality in the Zerafshan river basin - only an upstream riparian problem?
  14. The Meaning of Higher-Order Factors in Reflective-Measurement Models
  15. Effectiveness of a web-based intervention for injured claimants
  16. Value co-creation through collective intelligence in the public sector
  17. Gesichtssprache
  18. The Sociolinguistics of language use in Ireland
  19. What can be learnt from the brazilian cerrado?
  20. Integration of risk-oriented environmental management information systems and resource planning systems
  21. "Wen feiern wir denn eigentlich?"
  22. Correction to
  23. Lehrer-Kooperation im JeKi-Kontext
  24. Velocity-free friction compensation for motion systems with actuator constraint
  25. Nutrients addition regulates temperature sensitivity of maize straw mineralization
  26. Pastorale Agonalität
  27. Heterogeneity and Diversity
  28. Understanding role models for change
  29. Grassroots social innovation and the mobilisation of values in collaborative consumption
  30. Fluid-structure interaction modelling of a soft pneumatic actuator
  31. Investigation of the Controllability of Inductive Power Transmission Systems based on Flexible Coils
  32. Social group membership does not modulate automatic imitation in a contrastive multi-agent paradigm