Insights into the accuracy of social scientists’ forecasts of societal change

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Standard

Insights into the accuracy of social scientists’ forecasts of societal change. / Grossmann, Igor; Rotella, Amanda; Hutcherson, Cendri A. et al.
In: Nature Human Behaviour, Vol. 7, No. 4, 04.2023, p. 484-501.

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Grossmann, I, Rotella, A, Hutcherson, CA, Sharpinskyi, K, Varnum, MEW, Achter, S, Dhami, MK, Guo, XE, Kara-Yakoubian, M, Mandel, DR, Raes, L, Tay, L, Vie, A, Wagner, L, Adamkovic, M, Arami, A, Arriaga, P, Bandara, K, Baník, G, Bartoš, F, Baskin, E, Bergmeir, C, Białek, M, Børsting, CK, Browne, DT, Caruso, EM, Chen, R, Chie, BT, Chopik, WJ, Collins, RN, Cong, CW, Conway, LG, Davis, M, Day, MV, Dhaliwal, NA, Durham, JD, Dziekan, M, Elbaek, CT, Shuman, E, Fabrykant, M, Firat, M, Fong, GT, Frimer, JA, Gallegos, JM, Goldberg, SB, Gollwitzer, A, Goyal, J, Graf-Vlachy, L, Krenzler, R & Sevincer, T 2023, 'Insights into the accuracy of social scientists’ forecasts of societal change', Nature Human Behaviour, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 484-501. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-022-01517-1

APA

Grossmann, I., Rotella, A., Hutcherson, C. A., Sharpinskyi, K., Varnum, M. E. W., Achter, S., Dhami, M. K., Guo, X. E., Kara-Yakoubian, M., Mandel, D. R., Raes, L., Tay, L., Vie, A., Wagner, L., Adamkovic, M., Arami, A., Arriaga, P., Bandara, K., Baník, G., ... Sevincer, T. (2023). Insights into the accuracy of social scientists’ forecasts of societal change. Nature Human Behaviour, 7(4), 484-501. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-022-01517-1

Vancouver

Grossmann I, Rotella A, Hutcherson CA, Sharpinskyi K, Varnum MEW, Achter S et al. Insights into the accuracy of social scientists’ forecasts of societal change. Nature Human Behaviour. 2023 Apr;7(4):484-501. doi: 10.1038/s41562-022-01517-1

Bibtex

@article{ceba1c46c0ed4748be840851056a50b0,
title = "Insights into the accuracy of social scientists{\textquoteright} forecasts of societal change",
abstract = "How well can social scientists predict societal change, and what processes underlie their predictions? To answer these questions, we ran two forecasting tournaments testing the accuracy of predictions of societal change in domains commonly studied in the social sciences: ideological preferences, political polarization, life satisfaction, sentiment on social media, and gender–career and racial bias. After we provided them with historical trend data on the relevant domain, social scientists submitted pre-registered monthly forecasts for a year (Tournament 1; N = 86 teams and 359 forecasts), with an opportunity to update forecasts on the basis of new data six months later (Tournament 2; N = 120 teams and 546 forecasts). Benchmarking forecasting accuracy revealed that social scientists{\textquoteright} forecasts were on average no more accurate than those of simple statistical models (historical means, random walks or linear regressions) or the aggregate forecasts of a sample from the general public (N = 802). However, scientists were more accurate if they had scientific expertise in a prediction domain, were interdisciplinary, used simpler models and based predictions on prior data.",
keywords = "Psychology",
author = "Igor Grossmann and Amanda Rotella and Hutcherson, {Cendri A.} and Konstantyn Sharpinskyi and Varnum, {Michael E.W.} and Sebastian Achter and Dhami, {Mandeep K.} and Guo, {Xinqi Evie} and Mane Kara-Yakoubian and Mandel, {David R.} and Louis Raes and Louis Tay and Aymeric Vie and Lisa Wagner and Matus Adamkovic and Arash Arami and Patr{\'i}cia Arriaga and Kasun Bandara and Gabriel Ban{\'i}k and Franti{\v s}ek Barto{\v s} and Ernest Baskin and Christoph Bergmeir and Micha{\l} Bia{\l}ek and B{\o}rsting, {Caroline K.} and Browne, {Dillon T.} and Caruso, {Eugene M.} and Rong Chen and Chie, {Bin Tzong} and Chopik, {William J.} and Collins, {Robert N.} and Cong, {Chin Wen} and Conway, {Lucian G.} and Matthew Davis and Day, {Martin V.} and Dhaliwal, {Nathan A.} and Durham, {Justin D.} and Martyna Dziekan and Elbaek, {Christian T.} and Eric Shuman and Marharyta Fabrykant and Mustafa Firat and Fong, {Geoffrey T.} and Frimer, {Jeremy A.} and Gallegos, {Jonathan M.} and Goldberg, {Simon B.} and Anton Gollwitzer and Julia Goyal and Lorenz Graf-Vlachy and Ruslan Krenzler and Timur Sevincer",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2023, The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Limited.",
year = "2023",
month = apr,
doi = "10.1038/s41562-022-01517-1",
language = "English",
volume = "7",
pages = "484--501",
journal = "Nature Human Behaviour",
issn = "2397-3374",
publisher = "Nature Publishing Group",
number = "4",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Insights into the accuracy of social scientists’ forecasts of societal change

AU - Grossmann, Igor

AU - Rotella, Amanda

AU - Hutcherson, Cendri A.

AU - Sharpinskyi, Konstantyn

AU - Varnum, Michael E.W.

AU - Achter, Sebastian

AU - Dhami, Mandeep K.

AU - Guo, Xinqi Evie

AU - Kara-Yakoubian, Mane

AU - Mandel, David R.

AU - Raes, Louis

AU - Tay, Louis

AU - Vie, Aymeric

AU - Wagner, Lisa

AU - Adamkovic, Matus

AU - Arami, Arash

AU - Arriaga, Patrícia

AU - Bandara, Kasun

AU - Baník, Gabriel

AU - Bartoš, František

AU - Baskin, Ernest

AU - Bergmeir, Christoph

AU - Białek, Michał

AU - Børsting, Caroline K.

AU - Browne, Dillon T.

AU - Caruso, Eugene M.

AU - Chen, Rong

AU - Chie, Bin Tzong

AU - Chopik, William J.

AU - Collins, Robert N.

AU - Cong, Chin Wen

AU - Conway, Lucian G.

AU - Davis, Matthew

AU - Day, Martin V.

AU - Dhaliwal, Nathan A.

AU - Durham, Justin D.

AU - Dziekan, Martyna

AU - Elbaek, Christian T.

AU - Shuman, Eric

AU - Fabrykant, Marharyta

AU - Firat, Mustafa

AU - Fong, Geoffrey T.

AU - Frimer, Jeremy A.

AU - Gallegos, Jonathan M.

AU - Goldberg, Simon B.

AU - Gollwitzer, Anton

AU - Goyal, Julia

AU - Graf-Vlachy, Lorenz

AU - Krenzler, Ruslan

AU - Sevincer, Timur

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2023, The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Limited.

PY - 2023/4

Y1 - 2023/4

N2 - How well can social scientists predict societal change, and what processes underlie their predictions? To answer these questions, we ran two forecasting tournaments testing the accuracy of predictions of societal change in domains commonly studied in the social sciences: ideological preferences, political polarization, life satisfaction, sentiment on social media, and gender–career and racial bias. After we provided them with historical trend data on the relevant domain, social scientists submitted pre-registered monthly forecasts for a year (Tournament 1; N = 86 teams and 359 forecasts), with an opportunity to update forecasts on the basis of new data six months later (Tournament 2; N = 120 teams and 546 forecasts). Benchmarking forecasting accuracy revealed that social scientists’ forecasts were on average no more accurate than those of simple statistical models (historical means, random walks or linear regressions) or the aggregate forecasts of a sample from the general public (N = 802). However, scientists were more accurate if they had scientific expertise in a prediction domain, were interdisciplinary, used simpler models and based predictions on prior data.

AB - How well can social scientists predict societal change, and what processes underlie their predictions? To answer these questions, we ran two forecasting tournaments testing the accuracy of predictions of societal change in domains commonly studied in the social sciences: ideological preferences, political polarization, life satisfaction, sentiment on social media, and gender–career and racial bias. After we provided them with historical trend data on the relevant domain, social scientists submitted pre-registered monthly forecasts for a year (Tournament 1; N = 86 teams and 359 forecasts), with an opportunity to update forecasts on the basis of new data six months later (Tournament 2; N = 120 teams and 546 forecasts). Benchmarking forecasting accuracy revealed that social scientists’ forecasts were on average no more accurate than those of simple statistical models (historical means, random walks or linear regressions) or the aggregate forecasts of a sample from the general public (N = 802). However, scientists were more accurate if they had scientific expertise in a prediction domain, were interdisciplinary, used simpler models and based predictions on prior data.

KW - Psychology

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85147648888&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/4dc17226-e243-3733-837b-65d5ed75c63d/

U2 - 10.1038/s41562-022-01517-1

DO - 10.1038/s41562-022-01517-1

M3 - Journal articles

C2 - 36759585

AN - SCOPUS:85147648888

VL - 7

SP - 484

EP - 501

JO - Nature Human Behaviour

JF - Nature Human Behaviour

SN - 2397-3374

IS - 4

ER -

Recently viewed

Publications

  1. Effects of grade retention on achievement and self-concept in science and mathematics
  2. Effect of salinity on growth of mussels, Mytilus edulis, with special reference to Great Belt (Denmark)
  3. The planar Multipole Resonance Probe
  4. Strukturwandel oder Kommunikationsrevolution?
  5. Demographic Transition in Rural Areas: The Relationship between Public Services and Tourism Development
  6. Biodegradability of some antibiotics, elimination of the genotoxicity and affection of wastewater bacteria in a simple test
  7. Transponieren
  8. Weiterentwicklung der Unternehmensberichterstattung
  9. Resisting foundations
  10. Don't be upset! Can cars regulate anger by communication?
  11. Aktionsforschung
  12. Circularity in green chemical products, processes and services
  13. An assessment of The Natural Step theory of sustainability
  14. The ponds of Hattuša -
  15. Microstructure, mechanical and corrosion properties of Mg-Dy-Gd-Zr alloys for medical applications
  16. Evaluation of the toxic effects of four anti-cancer drugs in plant bioassays and its potency for screening in the context of waste water reuse for irrigation
  17. Threshold values in German labor law and job dynamics in small firms
  18. Gesellschaftliche Partizipation an Technisierungsprozessen
  19. Worte zu Landschaft
  20. First record of Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis on amphibians in Romania
  21. Die Rentenreform in der Diskussion
  22. Lebe Deine Stadt!
  23. The influence of observed body movements on consumer behavior
  24. A longitudinal study of teachers' occupational well-being
  25. Hochleistungsprozesse in der Zerspanung
  26. Dimensionen des Sozialverhaltens
  27. Kein Tod ohne Leben