Insights into the accuracy of social scientists’ forecasts of societal change

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Standard

Insights into the accuracy of social scientists’ forecasts of societal change. / Grossmann, Igor; Rotella, Amanda; Hutcherson, Cendri A. et al.
In: Nature Human Behaviour, Vol. 7, No. 4, 04.2023, p. 484-501.

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Grossmann, I, Rotella, A, Hutcherson, CA, Sharpinskyi, K, Varnum, MEW, Achter, S, Dhami, MK, Guo, XE, Kara-Yakoubian, M, Mandel, DR, Raes, L, Tay, L, Vie, A, Wagner, L, Adamkovic, M, Arami, A, Arriaga, P, Bandara, K, Baník, G, Bartoš, F, Baskin, E, Bergmeir, C, Białek, M, Børsting, CK, Browne, DT, Caruso, EM, Chen, R, Chie, BT, Chopik, WJ, Collins, RN, Cong, CW, Conway, LG, Davis, M, Day, MV, Dhaliwal, NA, Durham, JD, Dziekan, M, Elbaek, CT, Shuman, E, Fabrykant, M, Firat, M, Fong, GT, Frimer, JA, Gallegos, JM, Goldberg, SB, Gollwitzer, A, Goyal, J, Graf-Vlachy, L, Krenzler, R & Sevincer, T 2023, 'Insights into the accuracy of social scientists’ forecasts of societal change', Nature Human Behaviour, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 484-501. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-022-01517-1

APA

Grossmann, I., Rotella, A., Hutcherson, C. A., Sharpinskyi, K., Varnum, M. E. W., Achter, S., Dhami, M. K., Guo, X. E., Kara-Yakoubian, M., Mandel, D. R., Raes, L., Tay, L., Vie, A., Wagner, L., Adamkovic, M., Arami, A., Arriaga, P., Bandara, K., Baník, G., ... Sevincer, T. (2023). Insights into the accuracy of social scientists’ forecasts of societal change. Nature Human Behaviour, 7(4), 484-501. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-022-01517-1

Vancouver

Grossmann I, Rotella A, Hutcherson CA, Sharpinskyi K, Varnum MEW, Achter S et al. Insights into the accuracy of social scientists’ forecasts of societal change. Nature Human Behaviour. 2023 Apr;7(4):484-501. doi: 10.1038/s41562-022-01517-1

Bibtex

@article{ceba1c46c0ed4748be840851056a50b0,
title = "Insights into the accuracy of social scientists{\textquoteright} forecasts of societal change",
abstract = "How well can social scientists predict societal change, and what processes underlie their predictions? To answer these questions, we ran two forecasting tournaments testing the accuracy of predictions of societal change in domains commonly studied in the social sciences: ideological preferences, political polarization, life satisfaction, sentiment on social media, and gender–career and racial bias. After we provided them with historical trend data on the relevant domain, social scientists submitted pre-registered monthly forecasts for a year (Tournament 1; N = 86 teams and 359 forecasts), with an opportunity to update forecasts on the basis of new data six months later (Tournament 2; N = 120 teams and 546 forecasts). Benchmarking forecasting accuracy revealed that social scientists{\textquoteright} forecasts were on average no more accurate than those of simple statistical models (historical means, random walks or linear regressions) or the aggregate forecasts of a sample from the general public (N = 802). However, scientists were more accurate if they had scientific expertise in a prediction domain, were interdisciplinary, used simpler models and based predictions on prior data.",
keywords = "Psychology",
author = "Igor Grossmann and Amanda Rotella and Hutcherson, {Cendri A.} and Konstantyn Sharpinskyi and Varnum, {Michael E.W.} and Sebastian Achter and Dhami, {Mandeep K.} and Guo, {Xinqi Evie} and Mane Kara-Yakoubian and Mandel, {David R.} and Louis Raes and Louis Tay and Aymeric Vie and Lisa Wagner and Matus Adamkovic and Arash Arami and Patr{\'i}cia Arriaga and Kasun Bandara and Gabriel Ban{\'i}k and Franti{\v s}ek Barto{\v s} and Ernest Baskin and Christoph Bergmeir and Micha{\l} Bia{\l}ek and B{\o}rsting, {Caroline K.} and Browne, {Dillon T.} and Caruso, {Eugene M.} and Rong Chen and Chie, {Bin Tzong} and Chopik, {William J.} and Collins, {Robert N.} and Cong, {Chin Wen} and Conway, {Lucian G.} and Matthew Davis and Day, {Martin V.} and Dhaliwal, {Nathan A.} and Durham, {Justin D.} and Martyna Dziekan and Elbaek, {Christian T.} and Eric Shuman and Marharyta Fabrykant and Mustafa Firat and Fong, {Geoffrey T.} and Frimer, {Jeremy A.} and Gallegos, {Jonathan M.} and Goldberg, {Simon B.} and Anton Gollwitzer and Julia Goyal and Lorenz Graf-Vlachy and Ruslan Krenzler and Timur Sevincer",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2023, The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Limited.",
year = "2023",
month = apr,
doi = "10.1038/s41562-022-01517-1",
language = "English",
volume = "7",
pages = "484--501",
journal = "Nature Human Behaviour",
issn = "2397-3374",
publisher = "Nature Publishing Group",
number = "4",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Insights into the accuracy of social scientists’ forecasts of societal change

AU - Grossmann, Igor

AU - Rotella, Amanda

AU - Hutcherson, Cendri A.

AU - Sharpinskyi, Konstantyn

AU - Varnum, Michael E.W.

AU - Achter, Sebastian

AU - Dhami, Mandeep K.

AU - Guo, Xinqi Evie

AU - Kara-Yakoubian, Mane

AU - Mandel, David R.

AU - Raes, Louis

AU - Tay, Louis

AU - Vie, Aymeric

AU - Wagner, Lisa

AU - Adamkovic, Matus

AU - Arami, Arash

AU - Arriaga, Patrícia

AU - Bandara, Kasun

AU - Baník, Gabriel

AU - Bartoš, František

AU - Baskin, Ernest

AU - Bergmeir, Christoph

AU - Białek, Michał

AU - Børsting, Caroline K.

AU - Browne, Dillon T.

AU - Caruso, Eugene M.

AU - Chen, Rong

AU - Chie, Bin Tzong

AU - Chopik, William J.

AU - Collins, Robert N.

AU - Cong, Chin Wen

AU - Conway, Lucian G.

AU - Davis, Matthew

AU - Day, Martin V.

AU - Dhaliwal, Nathan A.

AU - Durham, Justin D.

AU - Dziekan, Martyna

AU - Elbaek, Christian T.

AU - Shuman, Eric

AU - Fabrykant, Marharyta

AU - Firat, Mustafa

AU - Fong, Geoffrey T.

AU - Frimer, Jeremy A.

AU - Gallegos, Jonathan M.

AU - Goldberg, Simon B.

AU - Gollwitzer, Anton

AU - Goyal, Julia

AU - Graf-Vlachy, Lorenz

AU - Krenzler, Ruslan

AU - Sevincer, Timur

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2023, The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Limited.

PY - 2023/4

Y1 - 2023/4

N2 - How well can social scientists predict societal change, and what processes underlie their predictions? To answer these questions, we ran two forecasting tournaments testing the accuracy of predictions of societal change in domains commonly studied in the social sciences: ideological preferences, political polarization, life satisfaction, sentiment on social media, and gender–career and racial bias. After we provided them with historical trend data on the relevant domain, social scientists submitted pre-registered monthly forecasts for a year (Tournament 1; N = 86 teams and 359 forecasts), with an opportunity to update forecasts on the basis of new data six months later (Tournament 2; N = 120 teams and 546 forecasts). Benchmarking forecasting accuracy revealed that social scientists’ forecasts were on average no more accurate than those of simple statistical models (historical means, random walks or linear regressions) or the aggregate forecasts of a sample from the general public (N = 802). However, scientists were more accurate if they had scientific expertise in a prediction domain, were interdisciplinary, used simpler models and based predictions on prior data.

AB - How well can social scientists predict societal change, and what processes underlie their predictions? To answer these questions, we ran two forecasting tournaments testing the accuracy of predictions of societal change in domains commonly studied in the social sciences: ideological preferences, political polarization, life satisfaction, sentiment on social media, and gender–career and racial bias. After we provided them with historical trend data on the relevant domain, social scientists submitted pre-registered monthly forecasts for a year (Tournament 1; N = 86 teams and 359 forecasts), with an opportunity to update forecasts on the basis of new data six months later (Tournament 2; N = 120 teams and 546 forecasts). Benchmarking forecasting accuracy revealed that social scientists’ forecasts were on average no more accurate than those of simple statistical models (historical means, random walks or linear regressions) or the aggregate forecasts of a sample from the general public (N = 802). However, scientists were more accurate if they had scientific expertise in a prediction domain, were interdisciplinary, used simpler models and based predictions on prior data.

KW - Psychology

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85147648888&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/4dc17226-e243-3733-837b-65d5ed75c63d/

U2 - 10.1038/s41562-022-01517-1

DO - 10.1038/s41562-022-01517-1

M3 - Journal articles

C2 - 36759585

AN - SCOPUS:85147648888

VL - 7

SP - 484

EP - 501

JO - Nature Human Behaviour

JF - Nature Human Behaviour

SN - 2397-3374

IS - 4

ER -

Recently viewed

Researchers

  1. Stephan Lassen

Publications

  1. Environmental justice and care
  2. An experimental approach to the optimisation of customer information at the point of sale
  3. Development and Testing of Water-Filled Tube Systems for Flood Protection Measures
  4. The adaptive eater
  5. Democratization as Human Empowerment
  6. Decline of an endangered amphibian during an extreme climatic event
  7. Ein quantitativer Vergleich der subjektiven und objektiven Komplexität von Verkehrssituationen
  8. Employees as a Second Audience
  9. Snowdrops in West Philadelphia
  10. Immunoadsorption in patients with haemolytic uraemic syndrome - Authors' reply
  11. Immediation as process and practice of signaletic mattering
  12. Consolidation period in new ventures
  13. A Communicational Disconnect
  14. Spatial characterization of social-ecological systems units for management in Tropical Dry Forests
  15. Public Value
  16. Introduction: From Dada Tricks to Post-Truth Politics
  17. Internationales Change Management
  18. Konversionen
  19. Tree diversity promotes predatory wasps and parasitoids but not pollinator bees in a subtropical experimental forest
  20. Personaltheorie als Beitrag zur Theorie der Unternehmung
  21. The Ambiguities of Experience
  22. Preferences and policy - Consuming art and culture in Baltimore and Hamburg
  23. Optimization of thermo-mechanical processing for forging of newly developed creep-resistant magnesium alloy ABAX633
  24. Informationsverarbeitung, Organisation der
  25. Interfacing medicinal chemistry with structural bioinformatics
  26. Dialektik der Umweltinformatik
  27. Digital Transformation and Institutional Theory
  28. Transindividuelle Affizierung
  29. „Nachhaltige“ Vorstandsvergütung bei börsennotierten Aktiengesellschaften
  30. Do workers perceive high wage settlements of craft unions as fair?
  31. Zugänge zu Lernerperspektiven auf das Textschreiben in der Grundschule
  32. Chemical Philosophy
  33. Rechnungslegung und Unternehmensüberwachung im Umbruch
  34. Cooperation, Trust and Performance
  35. Novel thought: Towards a literary study of organization
  36. Zurück in die Zukunft
  37. A Kinetic Approach to the study of Ideal Multipole Resonance Probe