Humane Orientation as a New Cultural Dimension of the GLOBE Project: A Validation Study of the GLOBE Scale and Out-Group Humane Orientation in 25 Countries

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Standard

Humane Orientation as a New Cultural Dimension of the GLOBE Project: A Validation Study of the GLOBE Scale and Out-Group Humane Orientation in 25 Countries. / Schloesser, Oliver; Frese, Michael; Heintze, Anna Maria et al.

In: Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, Vol. 44, No. 4, 05.2013, p. 535-551.

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Schloesser, O, Frese, M, Heintze, AM, Al-Najjar, M, Arciszewski , T, Besevegis, EG, Bishop, GD, Bonnes, M, Clegg, CW, Drozda-Senkowska, E, Gaborit, M, Garzon, D, Hansen, T, Heszen, I, Juhász, M, Keating, MA & Mangundjaya, W 2013, 'Humane Orientation as a New Cultural Dimension of the GLOBE Project: A Validation Study of the GLOBE Scale and Out-Group Humane Orientation in 25 Countries', Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, vol. 44, no. 4, pp. 535-551. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022112465671

APA

Schloesser, O., Frese, M., Heintze, A. M., Al-Najjar, M., Arciszewski , T., Besevegis, E. G., Bishop, G. D., Bonnes, M., Clegg, C. W., Drozda-Senkowska, E., Gaborit, M., Garzon, D., Hansen, T., Heszen, I., Juhász, M., Keating, M. A., & Mangundjaya, W. (2013). Humane Orientation as a New Cultural Dimension of the GLOBE Project: A Validation Study of the GLOBE Scale and Out-Group Humane Orientation in 25 Countries. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 44(4), 535-551. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022112465671

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{a691ac8d622845ea848db6fff1a150ae,
title = "Humane Orientation as a New Cultural Dimension of the GLOBE Project:: A Validation Study of the GLOBE Scale and Out-Group Humane Orientation in 25 Countries",
abstract = "We validate, extend, and empirically and theoretically criticize the cultural dimension of humane orientation of the project GLOBE (Global Leadership and Organizational Behavior Effectiveness Research Program). Theoretically, humane orientation is not just a one-dimensionally positive concept about being caring, altruistic, and kind to others as discussed by Kabasakal and Bodur (2004), but there is also a certain ambivalence to this concept. We suggest differentiating humane orientation toward in-group members from humane orientation toward out-group members. A multicountry construct validation study used student samples from 25 countries that were either high or low in humane orientation (N = 876) and studied their relation to the traditional GLOBE scale and other cultural-level measures (agreeableness, religiosity, authoritarianism, and welfare state score). Findings revealed a strong correlation between humane orientation and agreeableness, welfare state score, and religiosity. Out-group humane orientation proved to be the more relevant subfacet of the original humane orientation construct, suggesting that future research on humane orientation should make use of this measure instead of the vague original scale. The ambivalent character of out-group humane orientation is displayed in its positive correlation to high authoritarianism. Patriotism was used as a control variable for noncritical acceptance of one's society but did not change the correlations. Our findings are discussed as an example of how rigid expectations and a lack of tolerance for diversity may help explain the ambivalent nature of humane orientation.",
keywords = "Business psychology, agreeableness, authoritarianism, construct validation, religiosity, welfare state, Entrepreneurship",
author = "Oliver Schloesser and Michael Frese and Heintze, {Anna Maria} and Musaed Al-Najjar and Thomas Arciszewski and Besevegis, {Elias G.} and Bishop, {George D.} and Mirilia Bonnes and Clegg, {Chris W.} and Ewa Drozda-Senkowska and Mauricio Gaborit and Dayra Garzon and Tia Hansen and Irena Heszen and M{\'a}rta Juh{\'a}sz and Keating, {Mary A.} and Wustari Mangundjaya",
year = "2013",
month = may,
doi = "10.1177/0022022112465671",
language = "English",
volume = "44",
pages = "535--551",
journal = "Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology",
issn = "0022-0221",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "4",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Humane Orientation as a New Cultural Dimension of the GLOBE Project:

T2 - A Validation Study of the GLOBE Scale and Out-Group Humane Orientation in 25 Countries

AU - Schloesser, Oliver

AU - Frese, Michael

AU - Heintze, Anna Maria

AU - Al-Najjar, Musaed

AU - Arciszewski , Thomas

AU - Besevegis, Elias G.

AU - Bishop, George D.

AU - Bonnes, Mirilia

AU - Clegg, Chris W.

AU - Drozda-Senkowska, Ewa

AU - Gaborit, Mauricio

AU - Garzon, Dayra

AU - Hansen, Tia

AU - Heszen, Irena

AU - Juhász, Márta

AU - Keating, Mary A.

AU - Mangundjaya, Wustari

PY - 2013/5

Y1 - 2013/5

N2 - We validate, extend, and empirically and theoretically criticize the cultural dimension of humane orientation of the project GLOBE (Global Leadership and Organizational Behavior Effectiveness Research Program). Theoretically, humane orientation is not just a one-dimensionally positive concept about being caring, altruistic, and kind to others as discussed by Kabasakal and Bodur (2004), but there is also a certain ambivalence to this concept. We suggest differentiating humane orientation toward in-group members from humane orientation toward out-group members. A multicountry construct validation study used student samples from 25 countries that were either high or low in humane orientation (N = 876) and studied their relation to the traditional GLOBE scale and other cultural-level measures (agreeableness, religiosity, authoritarianism, and welfare state score). Findings revealed a strong correlation between humane orientation and agreeableness, welfare state score, and religiosity. Out-group humane orientation proved to be the more relevant subfacet of the original humane orientation construct, suggesting that future research on humane orientation should make use of this measure instead of the vague original scale. The ambivalent character of out-group humane orientation is displayed in its positive correlation to high authoritarianism. Patriotism was used as a control variable for noncritical acceptance of one's society but did not change the correlations. Our findings are discussed as an example of how rigid expectations and a lack of tolerance for diversity may help explain the ambivalent nature of humane orientation.

AB - We validate, extend, and empirically and theoretically criticize the cultural dimension of humane orientation of the project GLOBE (Global Leadership and Organizational Behavior Effectiveness Research Program). Theoretically, humane orientation is not just a one-dimensionally positive concept about being caring, altruistic, and kind to others as discussed by Kabasakal and Bodur (2004), but there is also a certain ambivalence to this concept. We suggest differentiating humane orientation toward in-group members from humane orientation toward out-group members. A multicountry construct validation study used student samples from 25 countries that were either high or low in humane orientation (N = 876) and studied their relation to the traditional GLOBE scale and other cultural-level measures (agreeableness, religiosity, authoritarianism, and welfare state score). Findings revealed a strong correlation between humane orientation and agreeableness, welfare state score, and religiosity. Out-group humane orientation proved to be the more relevant subfacet of the original humane orientation construct, suggesting that future research on humane orientation should make use of this measure instead of the vague original scale. The ambivalent character of out-group humane orientation is displayed in its positive correlation to high authoritarianism. Patriotism was used as a control variable for noncritical acceptance of one's society but did not change the correlations. Our findings are discussed as an example of how rigid expectations and a lack of tolerance for diversity may help explain the ambivalent nature of humane orientation.

KW - Business psychology

KW - agreeableness

KW - authoritarianism

KW - construct validation

KW - religiosity

KW - welfare state

KW - Entrepreneurship

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84875771370&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0022022112465671

DO - 10.1177/0022022112465671

M3 - Journal articles

VL - 44

SP - 535

EP - 551

JO - Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology

JF - Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology

SN - 0022-0221

IS - 4

ER -

DOI