TY - JOUR

T1 - How perfect is (too) perfect? Illuminating why the perfectionism-performance-relationship is (non-)linear

AU - Nols, Tilman

AU - Kohlenberg, Sophia A.

AU - Klein, Sebastian B.

AU - Boecker, Lea

AU - Cross, Ashtyn E.

AU - Loschelder, David D.

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2024 The Authors

PY - 2024/10/1

Y1 - 2024/10/1

N2 - Psychological science remains unclear about how individuals' trait perfectionism impacts their performance—is more perfectionism linearly better or does too perfect backfire? The present study investigates a potentially non-linear relationship and its underlying mediators. Based on the two-dimensional model of perfectionism that distinguishes perfectionistic concerns (PC) versus strivings (PS), we investigate the (non-)linear relationships of perfectionism and performance in the letter detection task. Additionally, we experimentally examined whether time pressure would moderate these findings. Our study results (N = 229) establish non-linearity: a quadratic function in the form of an inverted U-shape best explains the relationship between perfectionistic concerns and performance. Contrary to our hypothesis, perfectionistic strivings predicted task performance linearly but negatively. Upon further examination, we also found empirical support for a combinatory effect of both dimensions: Only individuals high in PC showed the negative effect of PS on task performance. Although performance differed in the timed versus untimed task, time pressure did not moderate the (non-)linear relationships of PS or PC on performance. Multiple mediation analyses revealed that perceived distress, rumination, and effort mediated the quadratic relationships of perfectionistic concerns. Overall, our results question the strict disentanglement of perfectionistic dimensions and emphasise the usefulness of a more holistic approach.

AB - Psychological science remains unclear about how individuals' trait perfectionism impacts their performance—is more perfectionism linearly better or does too perfect backfire? The present study investigates a potentially non-linear relationship and its underlying mediators. Based on the two-dimensional model of perfectionism that distinguishes perfectionistic concerns (PC) versus strivings (PS), we investigate the (non-)linear relationships of perfectionism and performance in the letter detection task. Additionally, we experimentally examined whether time pressure would moderate these findings. Our study results (N = 229) establish non-linearity: a quadratic function in the form of an inverted U-shape best explains the relationship between perfectionistic concerns and performance. Contrary to our hypothesis, perfectionistic strivings predicted task performance linearly but negatively. Upon further examination, we also found empirical support for a combinatory effect of both dimensions: Only individuals high in PC showed the negative effect of PS on task performance. Although performance differed in the timed versus untimed task, time pressure did not moderate the (non-)linear relationships of PS or PC on performance. Multiple mediation analyses revealed that perceived distress, rumination, and effort mediated the quadratic relationships of perfectionistic concerns. Overall, our results question the strict disentanglement of perfectionistic dimensions and emphasise the usefulness of a more holistic approach.

KW - Letter detection task

KW - Mediation

KW - Non-linearity

KW - Performance

KW - Time pressure

KW - Trait perfectionism

KW - Tripartite model

KW - Business psychology

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85194854831&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/2fe0c9e6-3015-3933-a978-d3bf024946b4/

U2 - 10.1016/j.paid.2024.112725

DO - 10.1016/j.paid.2024.112725

M3 - Journal articles

AN - SCOPUS:85194854831

VL - 228

JO - Personality and Individual Differences

JF - Personality and Individual Differences

SN - 0191-8869

M1 - 112725

ER -