Guided internet-based cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia: Health-economic evaluation from the societal and public health care perspective alongside a randomized controlled trial

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Authors

  • Claudia Buntrock
  • Dirk Lehr
  • Filip Smit
  • Hanne Horvath
  • Matthias Berking
  • Kai Spiegelhalder
  • Heleen Riper
  • David Daniel Ebert

BACKGROUND: The evidence base for internet-based cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia (iCBT-I) is firm; however, little is known about iCBT-I's health-economic effects.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness and cost-utility of iCBT-I in reducing insomnia among schoolteachers.

METHODS: Schoolteachers (N=128) with clinically significant insomnia symptoms and work-related rumination were randomized to guided iCBT-I or a wait list control group, both with unrestricted access to treatment as usual. Health care use, patient and family expenditures, and productivity losses were self-assessed and used for costing from a societal and a public health care perspective. Costs were related to symptom-free status (score <8 on the insomnia severity index) and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) gained. Sampling error was handled using nonparametric bootstrapping.

RESULTS: Statistically significant differences favoring the intervention group were found for both health outcomes (symptom-free status yes or no: β=.30; 95% CI 0.16-0.43; QALYs: β=.019, 95% CI 0.01-0.03). From a societal perspective, iCBT-I had a 94% probability of dominating the wait list control for both health outcomes. From a public health care perspective, iCBT-I was more effective but also more expensive than the wait list control, resulting in an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of €650 per symptom-free individual. In terms of QALYs, the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was €11,285. At a willingness-to-pay threshold of €20,000 per QALY gained, the intervention's probability of being cost-effective was 89%.

CONCLUSIONS: Our trial indicates that iCBT could be considered as a good value-for-money intervention for insomnia.

TRIAL REGISTRATION: German Clinical Trial Registry: DRKS00004700; https://tinyurl.com/2nnk57jm.

INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): RR2-10.1186/1745-6215-14-169.

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere25609
JournalJournal of Medical Internet Research
Volume23
Issue number5
ISSN1439-4456
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 24.05.2021

Bibliographical note

This was not an industry-supported study. The European Union funded this study (European Regional Development Fund: ZW6-80119999 and CCI 2007DE161PR001). The funder did not have a role in study design; data collection, analysis, and interpretation of results; or the decision to publish the study results.

©Claudia Buntrock, Dirk Lehr, Filip Smit, Hanne Horvath, Matthias Berking, Kai Spiegelhalder, Heleen Riper, David Daniel Ebert. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (https://www.jmir.org), 24.05.2021.

    Research areas

  • Behavior, Cognitive behavioral therapy, Cost-effectiveness, Cost-utility, Economic evaluation, Economics, ICBT-I, Insomnia, Internet-based cognitive behavioural therapy, Perspective, Public health, Sleep
  • Psychology
  • Health sciences

Documents

DOI

Recently viewed

Publications

  1. Hub, Fine-Tuner oder Business as Usual?
  2. Abiotic and biotic drivers of tree trait effects on soil microbial biomass and soil carbon concentration
  3. Fallstudie
  4. Taking Stock
  5. Implementing Environmental Management Accounting
  6. Narrative Strukturen als "Sprungbrett" in die Schriftlichkeit?
  7. Participation for effective environmental governance? Evidence from Water Framework Directive implementation in Germany, Spain and the United Kingdom
  8. Proprioceptive and sensorimotor performance in Parkinson's disease
  9. Monitoring the Monitor? Selective Responses to Human Rights Transgressions
  10. "Stimmiger Auftritt"
  11. Performance decline in low-stakes educational assessments
  12. Beyond pandemic populism
  13. What does theology do, actually?
  14. Ballons
  15. Scotland
  16. Modelling the effect of belowground herbivory on grassland diversity
  17. Erdgeschichte schreiben
  18. Idioms
  19. Science, policy and implementation gaps: An exploration of groundwater management in Hungary
  20. Wir müssen reden!
  21. Selbstständiges Lernen in einer Lernwerkstatt
  22. Consistency and Credibility?
  23. Entrepreneurial orientation and business performance
  24. MIKAS - Mikroanalysen und amtliche Statistik
  25. “IT’s the Devil”
  26. Einleitung
  27. "A letter as by Us"
  28. "Konfrontative Pädagogik"
  29. Wuthering heights
  30. Beschämende Niederlagen
  31. Positive interactions between nitrogen-fixing legumes and four different neighbouring species in a biodiversity experiment
  32. Debating accounting and sustainability: from incompatibility to rapprochement in the pursuit of corporate sustainability
  33. Nonadherence in outpatient thrombosis prophylaxis with low molecular weight heparins after major orthopaedic surgery
  34. Introduction
  35. Die mythologische Differenz
  36. Vergütung, variable
  37. The Theatricality of Organizational Atmosphere