Gender and (Un)Sustainability—Can Communication Solve a Conflict of Norms?

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Authors

In theory, and even more in the practice of sustainability communications, the gender dimension of sustainability has been neglected relative to other fields of the science. The aim of this paper is to show the relevance of gender as an analytical category for research and the importance of gender competence as an indispensable skill for professional sustainability communicators. Understanding how gender norms have contributed to inhibiting sustainable development is key to well-targeted means to communicate visions of sustainable ways of life. Traditional norms of masculinity are clearly in tension with the ethical, ecological and social implications of Sustainable Development, whereas the norms of femininity work against empowerment and participation of women. Current changes in gender relations and gender identities in the western world do not automatically solve this conflict of norms. Therefore, sustainability communication must and can contribute to shaping the social construction of gender towards new “sustainable” norms and ideals for the various gender identities in western societies. In order to achieve this, gender mainstreaming (GM) needs to be implemented in the field of sustainability communication, from capacity building for communicators to project design and research. Gender and diversity competence is to become a professional requirement, assuring that traditional “doing gender” is avoided, cultural diversity respected and structural inequalities are made visible. Visions of sustainable societies should include changes in gender relations. The argument is based on sociological studies, gender theories, gender policies, and environmental and sustainability communication studies, empirically supported by biographical studies and media analyses over the last twenty years in Western Europe, mainly Germany.
Original languageEnglish
JournalSustainability
Volume6
Issue number4
Pages (from-to)1973-1991
Number of pages19
ISSN2071-1050
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 10.04.2014

DOI

Recently viewed

Researchers

  1. Tanja Neubüser

Projects

  1. Summer School

Publications

  1. Mitarbeiterzentriertes Qualifizierungsmanagement
  2. Die Universität im Wettbewerb
  3. A construction of singular overlapping asymmetric self-similar measures
  4. What Makes a Person a Potential Tourist and a Region a Potential Tourism Destination?
  5. Determination of sulfur and selected trace elements in metallothionein-like proteins using capillary electrophoresis hyphenated to inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry with an octopole reaction cell
  6. Erfolgreich Führen in der Pflege
  7. A novel telecoupling framework to assess social relations across spatial scales for ecosystem services research
  8. Lektüreeindrücke zu Anselm Haverkamp
  9. Farewell to the party model?
  10. e-learning für das Fach Statistik
  11. Kontextualisierungshinweise
  12. Opportunities and limits to ecosystem services governance in developing countries and indigenous territories: The case of water supply in Southern Chile
  13. Self-Regulation, Language Skills, and Emotion Knowledge in Young Children From Northern Germany
  14. Entrepreneurship and the "theory of planned behavior"
  15. Introduction: Interiors and interiority
  16. Krieg in der Zivilgesellschaft
  17. Law, democracy, and the state of emergency.
  18. Transformative research for sustainability
  19. Coming late for dinner
  20. Property, personality rights and data protection with regard to biobanks
  21. Ordo-Responsibility
  22. How to make universal, voluntary testing for COVID-19 work? A behavioural economics perspective
  23. Nachhaltigkeit - zentrales Element des Lüneburger Studienprogramms
  24. Assessment for Transformation – Higher Education Thrives in Redefining Quality Systems
  25. Enhancing firm performance and innovativeness through error management culture
  26. 3-Lithio-1-triisopropylsilyl-1-propyne