Expertise in research integration and implementation for tackling complex problems: when is it needed, where can it be found and how can it be strengthened?

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Standard

Expertise in research integration and implementation for tackling complex problems: when is it needed, where can it be found and how can it be strengthened? / Bammer, Gabriele; O’Rourke, Michael; O’Connell, Deborah et al.
In: Humanities & social sciences communications, Vol. 6, No. 1, 5, 13.01.2020.

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Bammer, G, O’Rourke, M, O’Connell, D, Neuhauser, L, Midgley, G, Klein, JT, Grigg, NJ, Gadlin, H, Elsum, IR, Bursztyn, M, Fulton, EA, Pohl, C, Smithson, M, Vilsmaier, U, Bergmann, M, Jaeger, J, Merkx, F, Vienni Baptista, B, Burgman, MA, Walker, DH, Young, J, Bradbury, H, Crawford, L, Haryanto, B, Pachanee, CA, Polk, M & Richardson, GP 2020, 'Expertise in research integration and implementation for tackling complex problems: when is it needed, where can it be found and how can it be strengthened?', Humanities & social sciences communications, vol. 6, no. 1, 5. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-019-0380-0

APA

Bammer, G., O’Rourke, M., O’Connell, D., Neuhauser, L., Midgley, G., Klein, J. T., Grigg, N. J., Gadlin, H., Elsum, I. R., Bursztyn, M., Fulton, E. A., Pohl, C., Smithson, M., Vilsmaier, U., Bergmann, M., Jaeger, J., Merkx, F., Vienni Baptista, B., Burgman, M. A., ... Richardson, G. P. (2020). Expertise in research integration and implementation for tackling complex problems: when is it needed, where can it be found and how can it be strengthened? Humanities & social sciences communications, 6(1), Article 5. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-019-0380-0

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{5b16df832df642fba3d5173748523f04,
title = "Expertise in research integration and implementation for tackling complex problems: when is it needed, where can it be found and how can it be strengthened?",
abstract = "Expertise in research integration and implementation is an essential but often overlooked component of tackling complex societal and environmental problems. We focus on expertise relevant to any complex problem, especially contributory expertise, divided into {\textquoteleft}knowing-that{\textquoteright} and {\textquoteleft}knowing-how.{\textquoteright} We also deal with interactional expertise and the fact that much expertise is tacit. We explore three questions. First, in examining {\textquoteleft}when is expertise in research integration and implementation required?,{\textquoteright} we review tasks essential (a) to developing more comprehensive understandings of complex problems, plus possible ways to address them, and (b) for supporting implementation of those understandings into government policy, community practice, business and social innovation, or other initiatives. Second, in considering {\textquoteleft}where can expertise in research integration and implementation currently be found?,{\textquoteright} we describe three realms: (a) specific approaches, including interdisciplinarity, transdisciplinarity, systems thinking and sustainability science; (b) case-based experience that is independent of these specific approaches; and (c) research examining elements of integration and implementation, specifically considering unknowns and fostering innovation. We highlight examples of expertise in each realm and demonstrate how fragmentation currently precludes clear identification of research integration and implementation expertise. Third, in exploring {\textquoteleft}what is required to strengthen expertise in research integration and implementation?,{\textquoteright} we propose building a knowledge bank. We delve into three key challenges: compiling existing expertise, indexing and organising the expertise to make it widely accessible, and understanding and overcoming the core reasons for the existing fragmentation. A growing knowledge bank of expertise in research integration and implementation on the one hand, and accumulating success in addressing complex societal and environmental problems on the other, will form a virtuous cycle so that each strengthens the other. Building a coalition of researchers and institutions will ensure this expertise and its application are valued and sustained.",
keywords = "Transdisciplinary studies",
author = "Gabriele Bammer and Michael O{\textquoteright}Rourke and Deborah O{\textquoteright}Connell and Linda Neuhauser and Gerald Midgley and Klein, {Julie Thompson} and Grigg, {Nicola J.} and Howard Gadlin and Elsum, {Ian R.} and Marcel Bursztyn and Fulton, {Elizabeth A.} and Christian Pohl and Michael Smithson and Ulli Vilsmaier and Matthias Bergmann and Jill Jaeger and Femke Merkx and {Vienni Baptista}, Bianca and Burgman, {Mark A.} and Walker, {Daniel H.} and John Young and Hilary Bradbury and Lynn Crawford and Budi Haryanto and Pachanee, {Cha aim} and Merritt Polk and Richardson, {George P.}",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2020, The Author(s).",
year = "2020",
month = jan,
day = "13",
doi = "10.1057/s41599-019-0380-0",
language = "English",
volume = "6",
journal = "Humanities & social sciences communications",
issn = "2055-1045",
publisher = "Springer Nature AG",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Expertise in research integration and implementation for tackling complex problems

T2 - when is it needed, where can it be found and how can it be strengthened?

AU - Bammer, Gabriele

AU - O’Rourke, Michael

AU - O’Connell, Deborah

AU - Neuhauser, Linda

AU - Midgley, Gerald

AU - Klein, Julie Thompson

AU - Grigg, Nicola J.

AU - Gadlin, Howard

AU - Elsum, Ian R.

AU - Bursztyn, Marcel

AU - Fulton, Elizabeth A.

AU - Pohl, Christian

AU - Smithson, Michael

AU - Vilsmaier, Ulli

AU - Bergmann, Matthias

AU - Jaeger, Jill

AU - Merkx, Femke

AU - Vienni Baptista, Bianca

AU - Burgman, Mark A.

AU - Walker, Daniel H.

AU - Young, John

AU - Bradbury, Hilary

AU - Crawford, Lynn

AU - Haryanto, Budi

AU - Pachanee, Cha aim

AU - Polk, Merritt

AU - Richardson, George P.

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2020, The Author(s).

PY - 2020/1/13

Y1 - 2020/1/13

N2 - Expertise in research integration and implementation is an essential but often overlooked component of tackling complex societal and environmental problems. We focus on expertise relevant to any complex problem, especially contributory expertise, divided into ‘knowing-that’ and ‘knowing-how.’ We also deal with interactional expertise and the fact that much expertise is tacit. We explore three questions. First, in examining ‘when is expertise in research integration and implementation required?,’ we review tasks essential (a) to developing more comprehensive understandings of complex problems, plus possible ways to address them, and (b) for supporting implementation of those understandings into government policy, community practice, business and social innovation, or other initiatives. Second, in considering ‘where can expertise in research integration and implementation currently be found?,’ we describe three realms: (a) specific approaches, including interdisciplinarity, transdisciplinarity, systems thinking and sustainability science; (b) case-based experience that is independent of these specific approaches; and (c) research examining elements of integration and implementation, specifically considering unknowns and fostering innovation. We highlight examples of expertise in each realm and demonstrate how fragmentation currently precludes clear identification of research integration and implementation expertise. Third, in exploring ‘what is required to strengthen expertise in research integration and implementation?,’ we propose building a knowledge bank. We delve into three key challenges: compiling existing expertise, indexing and organising the expertise to make it widely accessible, and understanding and overcoming the core reasons for the existing fragmentation. A growing knowledge bank of expertise in research integration and implementation on the one hand, and accumulating success in addressing complex societal and environmental problems on the other, will form a virtuous cycle so that each strengthens the other. Building a coalition of researchers and institutions will ensure this expertise and its application are valued and sustained.

AB - Expertise in research integration and implementation is an essential but often overlooked component of tackling complex societal and environmental problems. We focus on expertise relevant to any complex problem, especially contributory expertise, divided into ‘knowing-that’ and ‘knowing-how.’ We also deal with interactional expertise and the fact that much expertise is tacit. We explore three questions. First, in examining ‘when is expertise in research integration and implementation required?,’ we review tasks essential (a) to developing more comprehensive understandings of complex problems, plus possible ways to address them, and (b) for supporting implementation of those understandings into government policy, community practice, business and social innovation, or other initiatives. Second, in considering ‘where can expertise in research integration and implementation currently be found?,’ we describe three realms: (a) specific approaches, including interdisciplinarity, transdisciplinarity, systems thinking and sustainability science; (b) case-based experience that is independent of these specific approaches; and (c) research examining elements of integration and implementation, specifically considering unknowns and fostering innovation. We highlight examples of expertise in each realm and demonstrate how fragmentation currently precludes clear identification of research integration and implementation expertise. Third, in exploring ‘what is required to strengthen expertise in research integration and implementation?,’ we propose building a knowledge bank. We delve into three key challenges: compiling existing expertise, indexing and organising the expertise to make it widely accessible, and understanding and overcoming the core reasons for the existing fragmentation. A growing knowledge bank of expertise in research integration and implementation on the one hand, and accumulating success in addressing complex societal and environmental problems on the other, will form a virtuous cycle so that each strengthens the other. Building a coalition of researchers and institutions will ensure this expertise and its application are valued and sustained.

KW - Transdisciplinary studies

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85077906442&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1057/s41599-019-0380-0

DO - 10.1057/s41599-019-0380-0

M3 - Journal articles

AN - SCOPUS:85077906442

VL - 6

JO - Humanities & social sciences communications

JF - Humanities & social sciences communications

SN - 2055-1045

IS - 1

M1 - 5

ER -

Documents

DOI

Recently viewed

Publications

  1. The contribution of material circularity to sustainability—Recycling and reuse of textiles
  2. Sport und Arbeitseinkommen – Individuelle Ertragsraten von Sportaktivitäten in Deutschland
  3. Reliability and Validity of Assessing User Satisfaction With Web-Based Health Interventions
  4. Red and green loops help uncover missing feedbacks in a coral reef social–ecological system
  5. Querschnittsstudie Erfolgsfaktoren für mitteltiefe Aquiferwärmespeicher in Norddeutschland
  6. Experimental and numerical investigation of residual stresses in laser shock peened AA2198
  7. Bauherren und Bauhandwerksdienstleistungen - eine empirisch-informationsökonomische Analyse
  8. Road verges facilitate exotic species’ expansion into undisturbed natural montane grasslands
  9. Mapping water ecosystem services: Evaluating InVEST model predictions in data scarce regions
  10. Edible wild fruit trees and shrubs and their socioeconomic significance in central ethiopia
  11. The resilience of agricultural landscapes characterized by land sparing versus land sharing
  12. Energiegenossenschaften im Kontext einer sozial - ökologischen Transformation der Ökonomie
  13. Structuring Sustainability Reports for Environmental Standards with LLMs guided by Ontology
  14. Fire and landscape context shape plant and butterfly diversity in a South African shrubland
  15. Introducing Residual Stresses on Sheet Metals by Slide Hardening under Stress Superposition
  16. Der RegE für ein Finanzmarktintegritätsstärkungs­gesetz (FISG) – Quo vadis, Corporate Governance?
  17. WAGE POLICY CONFLICTS AND COLLECTIVE STOCK-SHARING - THE CASE OF THE SWEDISH WAGE-EARNER FUNDS
  18. Plant diversity in a changing agricultural landscape mosaic in Southern Transylvania (Romania)
  19. Landscape context influences chytrid fungus distribution in an endangered European amphibian
  20. Circular Supply Chain Management in the Wind Energy Industry - A Systematic Literature Review
  21. Crop diversity effects on temporal agricultural production stability across European regions
  22. Corporate social responsibility performance, reporting and generalized methods of moments (GMM)
  23. I share because of who I am: values, identities, norms, and attitudes explain sharing intentions
  24. Multiplexed supply of a MISO wireless power transfer system for battery-free wireless sensors
  25. Competence development of high achievers within the highest track in German secondary school
  26. Are the terms “Socio-economic status” and “Class status” a warped form of reasoning for Max Weber?
  27. A leverage points perspective on social networks to understand sustainability transformations