Disentangling the practice of landscape approaches: a Q-method analysis on experiences in socio-ecological production landscapes and seascapes

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Authors

Landscape approaches are gaining momentum in both scientific and policy agendas. However, landscape approaches comprise a multitude of concepts, approaches and principles, which are in part similar, in some parts different or even contradictory. In this paper, we used a Q-method questionnaire to explore how landscape approaches are understood and employed in 45 case studies of socio-ecological production landscapes and seascapes derived from the International Partnership for the Satoyama Initiative (IPSI), as well as the motivations for employing them. Our analysis revealed that all landscape approaches pursued very similar goals, namely to ensure that local communities as landscape stewards have the capacity to preserve context-specific values in the face of socio-economic and environmental changes. The tools for reaching such goals are built upon people and nature feedback dynamics that crystalize in rich biodiversity and local ecological knowledge. However, our analysis also showed that the means to reach those goals differed depending on many contextual factors, such as the dominant ecosystems and socio-economic activities in the landscape, the constellation of actors or the most relevant drivers of change affecting the social–ecological system. In particular, we identified four distinct lenses in which landscapes approaches are applied in practice to landscape sustainability: (1) for the preservation of natural values, (2) for the preservation of socio-cultural values, (3) for the promotion of social justice and participatory governance, and (4) for securing food security and local livelihoods. Our results showed an association between the choice of a lens and the value types motivating the use of a landscape approach. Relational values were associated with a focus on landscape conservation and safeguard of social–ecological values. Our study highlights the relevant and beneficial role of landscape approaches as a boundary concept and emphasizes the need for transdisciplinary and participatory methods within landscape research and practice to navigate the context-specific options for implementation of landscape approaches.
Original languageEnglish
JournalSustainability Science
Volume18
Issue number4
Pages (from-to)1893-1906
Number of pages14
ISSN1862-4065
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 01.07.2023

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
This research has been funded by the German Research Foundation (DFG, Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft) project number 426675955, Landscape Chains. CQS acknowledges EU funding through the Marie Sklodowska–Curie grant number 101031168. MACP was funded by the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research, Grant Number: 01LC18064. We are grateful to the IPSI secretariat for their support and share of resources and to the 45 case studies that participated in this research.

Publisher Copyright:
© 2023, The Author(s).

Recently viewed

Publications

  1. Development of a Sustainability Balanced Scorecard
  2. Deconstructing corporate sustainability narratives
  3. Collective emotions in institutional creation work
  4. 3. Methoden-Muster: Austausch, Koordination, Abstimmung
  5. Wenn manche Lehrkräfte wüssten, was andere wissen ...
  6. Verschwörungstheoretikerinnen - Ein blinder Fleck?
  7. Unterstützung zum Erwerb welcher Arbeitsfähigkeit?
  8. Sprachsensibler Unterricht an beruflichen Schulen
  9. Preventing the onset of major depressive disorder
  10. Linguistische Grundlagen für den Sprachunterricht
  11. Kurt Schwitters und Erst Jünger am Romsdalenfjord
  12. Job maintenance through supported employment PLUS
  13. Jeanne Dielman, 23, quai du Commerce, 1080 Bruxelles
  14. Internationales und Europäisches Finanzmarktrecht
  15. Interessenpolitisch orientiertes Umweltmanagement
  16. Intelligence assessment with computer simulations
  17. Innovations for enabling urban climate governance
  18. Flächenfonds als öffentlich-private Partnerschaft
  19. Existential insecurity and deference to authority
  20. Die kulturelle Dimension nachhaltiger Entwicklung
  21. Communicative Constitution Model of Organizations
  22. Beschreibung zentraler mathematischer Kompetenzen
  23. Arbeitszufriedenheit im internationalen Vergleich
  24. Analysekompetenz - ein zweidimensionales Konstrukt?
  25. Agricultural Sector as crucial for the Sahel zone
  26. Warum die Vaterschaft Anerkennung eingebüßt hat
  27. Warrant price responses to credit spread changes
  28. Transformation archetypes in global food systems
  29. The Image of Germany in British Juvenile Fiction
  30. Sustainable business model research and practice
  31. Scaling the impact of sustainability initiatives
  32. Psychophysiological Correlates of Flow-Experience
  33. Protected area management in a post-natural world
  34. Professionalisierungsbedarf in der Lehrerbildung
  35. Nachhaltigkeitsstrategien erfolgreich entwickeln
  36. Management integrierter Wertschöpfungsnetzwerke
  37. Long-Term Strategies for Tackling Micropollutants
  38. Kultur-Evolution: Partizipation und Nachhaltigkeit
  39. Innovatives Management staatlicher Umweltpolitik
  40. Experts of thoroughness and fanatics of planning?
  41. Does it pay to be active on many foreign markets?
  42. Entwicklung und Zukunft der Sexualität und Liebe
  43. Die ‚Arisierung’ jüdischen Grundbesitzes in Bremen
  44. Computational modeling of material flow networks
  45. Anerkennung von Differenz in der Sozialen Arbeit
  46. Addressing Health Literacy in Schools in Germany