Disentangling the practice of landscape approaches: a Q-method analysis on experiences in socio-ecological production landscapes and seascapes

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Authors

Landscape approaches are gaining momentum in both scientific and policy agendas. However, landscape approaches comprise a multitude of concepts, approaches and principles, which are in part similar, in some parts different or even contradictory. In this paper, we used a Q-method questionnaire to explore how landscape approaches are understood and employed in 45 case studies of socio-ecological production landscapes and seascapes derived from the International Partnership for the Satoyama Initiative (IPSI), as well as the motivations for employing them. Our analysis revealed that all landscape approaches pursued very similar goals, namely to ensure that local communities as landscape stewards have the capacity to preserve context-specific values in the face of socio-economic and environmental changes. The tools for reaching such goals are built upon people and nature feedback dynamics that crystalize in rich biodiversity and local ecological knowledge. However, our analysis also showed that the means to reach those goals differed depending on many contextual factors, such as the dominant ecosystems and socio-economic activities in the landscape, the constellation of actors or the most relevant drivers of change affecting the social–ecological system. In particular, we identified four distinct lenses in which landscapes approaches are applied in practice to landscape sustainability: (1) for the preservation of natural values, (2) for the preservation of socio-cultural values, (3) for the promotion of social justice and participatory governance, and (4) for securing food security and local livelihoods. Our results showed an association between the choice of a lens and the value types motivating the use of a landscape approach. Relational values were associated with a focus on landscape conservation and safeguard of social–ecological values. Our study highlights the relevant and beneficial role of landscape approaches as a boundary concept and emphasizes the need for transdisciplinary and participatory methods within landscape research and practice to navigate the context-specific options for implementation of landscape approaches.
Original languageEnglish
JournalSustainability Science
Volume18
Issue number4
Pages (from-to)1893-1906
Number of pages14
ISSN1862-4065
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 01.07.2023

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
This research has been funded by the German Research Foundation (DFG, Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft) project number 426675955, Landscape Chains. CQS acknowledges EU funding through the Marie Sklodowska–Curie grant number 101031168. MACP was funded by the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research, Grant Number: 01LC18064. We are grateful to the IPSI secretariat for their support and share of resources and to the 45 case studies that participated in this research.

Publisher Copyright:
© 2023, The Author(s).

Recently viewed

Researchers

  1. Nika Daryan

Publications

  1. Appointing female CEOs in risky and precarious firm circumstances.
  2. Die neue Parallelgesellschaft
  3. Reality tv und reality computing - von der wundersamen Vermehrung der Realität
  4. Compensation-related institutional investor activism.
  5. Educating moral sensitivity in business
  6. Die "Offene Bibliothek" von Clegg & Guttmann
  7. Richard Oehring: Straßen fließen steinern in den Tag
  8. Weather and Holiday Destination Preferences
  9. Pollution exposure on marine protected areas
  10. Methoden-Muster: Training von Erziehungskompetenzen
  11. Erhaltung virtueller Realitäten
  12. Schlüsselqualifikationen
  13. Act or Wait-and-See? Adversity, Agility, and Entrepreneur Wellbeing across Countries during the COVID-19 Pandemic
  14. The economic and psychological effects of cash transfers in development cooperation
  15. Regulierung von Stimmrechtsberatern nach ARUG II
  16. Magnesium alloys for biomedical applications
  17. Profitables Wachstum durch Neukundengewinnung
  18. F. LeRon Shults: Reforming Theological Anthropology. After the Philosophical Turn to Relationality. Grand Rapids u.a. 2003
  19. A Dollhouse as a Situational Context for Mulitplicative Reasoning
  20. Originäre und derivative Unternehmensgründung
  21. Actors in transitions
  22. Digitale Kulturen
  23. Traumziel Nachhaltigkeit
  24. Adapting energy infrastructure to climate change - Is there a need for government interventions and legal obligations within the German "energiewende"?
  25. Abfluss von Urbanflächen
  26. Identification of an immunodominant H-2Db-restricted CTL epitope of human PSA
  27. 44 VwGO: objektive Klagehäufung
  28. Robust estimates of exporter productivity premia in German business services enterprises
  29. Bird Diversity and the Resilience of Southwestern Ethiopian Forests
  30. The impact of governance on integrated reporting
  31. Die Rationalität des grünen Traditionalismus oder: Die Suche nach Alternativen
  32. PoNa als inter- und transdisziplinäres Experiment in der Sozial-ökologischen Forschung
  33. Zwischen Rinteln und Helmstedt
  34. Der (Konzern-)Lagebericht als strategisches Kommunikationsinstrument für das Value Based Management
  35. Vorwort
  36. Forschung zur ersten Phase der Lehrerbildung
  37. ‘Kollegah the Boss’
  38. Role of scavengers in providing non-material contributions to people