Disentangling the practice of landscape approaches: a Q-method analysis on experiences in socio-ecological production landscapes and seascapes

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Authors

Landscape approaches are gaining momentum in both scientific and policy agendas. However, landscape approaches comprise a multitude of concepts, approaches and principles, which are in part similar, in some parts different or even contradictory. In this paper, we used a Q-method questionnaire to explore how landscape approaches are understood and employed in 45 case studies of socio-ecological production landscapes and seascapes derived from the International Partnership for the Satoyama Initiative (IPSI), as well as the motivations for employing them. Our analysis revealed that all landscape approaches pursued very similar goals, namely to ensure that local communities as landscape stewards have the capacity to preserve context-specific values in the face of socio-economic and environmental changes. The tools for reaching such goals are built upon people and nature feedback dynamics that crystalize in rich biodiversity and local ecological knowledge. However, our analysis also showed that the means to reach those goals differed depending on many contextual factors, such as the dominant ecosystems and socio-economic activities in the landscape, the constellation of actors or the most relevant drivers of change affecting the social–ecological system. In particular, we identified four distinct lenses in which landscapes approaches are applied in practice to landscape sustainability: (1) for the preservation of natural values, (2) for the preservation of socio-cultural values, (3) for the promotion of social justice and participatory governance, and (4) for securing food security and local livelihoods. Our results showed an association between the choice of a lens and the value types motivating the use of a landscape approach. Relational values were associated with a focus on landscape conservation and safeguard of social–ecological values. Our study highlights the relevant and beneficial role of landscape approaches as a boundary concept and emphasizes the need for transdisciplinary and participatory methods within landscape research and practice to navigate the context-specific options for implementation of landscape approaches.
Original languageEnglish
JournalSustainability Science
Volume18
Issue number4
Pages (from-to)1893-1906
Number of pages14
ISSN1862-4065
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 01.07.2023

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
This research has been funded by the German Research Foundation (DFG, Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft) project number 426675955, Landscape Chains. CQS acknowledges EU funding through the Marie Sklodowska–Curie grant number 101031168. MACP was funded by the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research, Grant Number: 01LC18064. We are grateful to the IPSI secretariat for their support and share of resources and to the 45 case studies that participated in this research.

Publisher Copyright:
© 2023, The Author(s).

Recently viewed

Researchers

  1. Paul Zeise

Publications

  1. Lektüreeindrücke zu Anselm Haverkamp
  2. UVP und vorzeitiger Beginn
  3. Web-based depression treatment for type 1 and type 2 diabetic patients
  4. Die Rolle der Lehrerpersönlichkeit angesichts der Möglichkeiten digitaler Technik
  5. EU Asylum Policies
  6. RAF und der neue "Faschismus"
  7. Johannes Zachhuber: Theology as Science in Nineteenth-Century Germany: From F. C. Baur to Ernst Troeltsch
  8. Kognitive Aktivierung und Strukturierung durch Aufgaben
  9. A Place Apart: Opportunities in Developing
  10. Gendersensible Didaktik
  11. Institutional rearrangements in the north Luangwa ecosystem
  12. Hast du heute schon gelebt?
  13. Ecological and social outcomes of urbanization on regional farming systems
  14. Appointing to Govern: Party Patronage in Europe
  15. Nachhaltigen Konsum fördern durch partizipative Interventionsentwicklung in Bildungseinrichtungen
  16. Quantum chemical calculation of the vapor pressure of volatile and semi volatile organic compounds
  17. No Roots
  18. Gefährder
  19. Books on World Art from the 1920s
  20. Abschluss des Vertrages
  21. Trainingslager mit Kindern und Jugendlichen
  22. Buche oder Eiche
  23. Gewalt
  24. Das Management der Kunden
  25. Ertrags-/Risikooptimierung von Nachhaltigkeitsfonds
  26. Das Subjekt und die Atmosphären, durch die es ist
  27. Environmental and operational sustainability of airports
  28. Exports and productivity
  29. Partizipation als reflexive Praxis im Hilfeplangespräch?
  30. Der Zusammenhang von Schulleitungshandeln, Unterrichtsgestaltung und Lernerfolg
  31. Four decades of research on alexithymia
  32. The sources of international investment law